Long-Term Effects of First-Grade Multitier Intervention

REFERENCES

• Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. Elementary School Journal, 111, 535–560. NIHMS ID 249051.
   Google Scholar
• . Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (in press). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Manuscript accepted for publication in Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• . Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Schatschneider, C., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Predicting first grade reading performance from kindergarten response to instruction. Exceptional Children, 77, 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• . Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300–316.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, K.D., & O’Connor, R.E. (2013). Early response-to-intervention measures and criteria as predictors of reading disability in the beginning of third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219413495451
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate—A new and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., … Treadway, G.H. (2002). Open court reading. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & R. Hallahan, R. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., & Frances, D.J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447–466. doi:10.1177/00222194060390050601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C.A., Tolar, T.D., Fletcher, J.M., Barth, A.E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D.J. (2013). Effects of Tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 633–648. doi:10.1037/a0032581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J.M., Coulter, W.A., Reschly, D.J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 304–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Denton, C.A., Cirino, P.T., Francis, D.J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Cognitive correlates of inadequate response to reading intervention. School Psychology Review, 40, 3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading disabilities in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. doi:10.1037//0022–0663.90.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W.D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J.K, Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Bouton, B., Barquero, L.A., & Cho, E. (2013). Efficacy of a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 135–154. doi:10.1002/rrq.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2001). Dynamic indicators of basic literacy skills . (6th ed.). Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Graves, A. (2003). The English-language learner classroom observation instrument: Observations of beginning reading instruction in urban schools. In S. Vaughn & K.L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 111–144). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G.A. (2006) Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D.R., King, S.A., Lemons, C.J., & Partanen, J.N. (2012). Fidelity of implementation and instructional alignment in Response to Intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 116–124. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5826.2012.00357.x
   Google Scholar
• Lam, E.A., & McMaster, K. (in press). Predictors of responsiveness to early literacy intervention: A ten year update. Manuscript accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R.J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C.J., & Whitehurst, G.J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 265–292. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, G.R., & Chhabra, V. (1996), The current state of science and the future of specific reading disability. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 2–9. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098–2779(1996)2:1<2::AID-MRDD2>3.0.CO;2-X
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P.G., Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182. doi:10.1598/RRQ. 40.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathes, P.G., Torgesen, J.K., Wahl, M., Menchetti, J.C., & Grek, M.L. (1999). Proactive beginning reading: Intensive small group instruction for struggling readers . (#R01 HD). Prevention and Remediation of Reading Disabilities, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Available from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., Benner, G.J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 255. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.00080
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 43–54. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62443452?accountid=4840
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R.E., Harty, K.R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. [RtI]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532–538. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M.M., & Shinn, M.R. (2004). AIMSweb. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, D.C., Kameenui, E.J., Stoolmiller, M., Coyne, M.D., & Harn, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science up to scale (pp. 197–228). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speece, D.L., Schatschneider, C., Silverman, R., Case, L.P., Cooper, D.H., & Jacobs, D.M. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework. The Elementary School Journal, 11, 585–607. doi:10.1086/659032
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency, 2nd edition. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Swanson, L.H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 283–295. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/870288217?accountid=4840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Denton, C.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 432–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Murray, C.S. (2007). Monitoring response to supplemental services for students at risk for reading difficulties: High and low responders. In S.R. Jimerson, M.K. Burns, & A.M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 234–243). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3_17
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C.S., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A.L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention: Examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75, 165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M.B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S.G., & Fanuele, D.P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
   Google Scholar
• . Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third edition. San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson-III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar