Note-Taking Interventions for College Students: A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

References

• Armbruster, B. B. (2009). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (2nd ed., pp. 220–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L., Gilbert, M., Thibeault, M. D., Carr, J. E., & Bailey, J. S. (2002). Effects of guided notes on university students' responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 243–254. doi:10.1023/A:1021110922552
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., Jeong, D.W., & Cho, S.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255–270. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Student's lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 28–32. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1201_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbetta, P. M., & Skaruppa, C. L. (1995). Looking for a way to improve your behavior analysis lectures? Try guided notes. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 155–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 305–312. doi:10.1080/00986280802373841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work? Journal of Human Resources, 44, 736–771. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D. C., & Myerson, J. (2014). The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cohen, D., Kim, E., Tan, J., & Winkelmes, M. A. (2013). A note-restructuring intervention increases students' exam scores. College Teaching, 61, 95–99. doi:10.1080/87567555.2013.793168
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., Cohn, S., & Bradley, J., Jr. (1995). Notetaking, working memory, and learning in principles of economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 26, 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, V., & Hughes, D. C. (1978). Effects of three types of university lecture notes on student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 175–179. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covill, A. E. (2011). College students' perceptions of the traditional lecture method. College Student Journal, 45(1), 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., & Hult, R. E. (1997). Effects of writing summaries as generative learning activity during note-taking. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 47–49. doi:10.1177/009862839702400111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesLauriers, L., Schelew E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. doi:10.1126/science.1201783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskritt, M., Lee, K., & Donald, M. (2001). The influence of symbolic literacy on memory: Testing Plato's hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flippo, R. F., & Caverly, D. C. (2000). Handbook of college reading and study strategy research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, G. (2014). The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1180–1187. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur, T., Dilci, T., Coskun, I, & Delican, B. (2013). The impact on listening comprehension in a higher education context. International Journal of Academic Research, 5, 93–97. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-1/B.16
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, W. M. (2007). The necessity of academic accommodations for first-year college students with learning disabilities. Journal of College Admission, 195, 9–13. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ783943.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. J., & Stephens, J. A. (2000). The ethics of learner-centered education: Dynamics that impede progress. Change, 32, 40–47. Retrieved from http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/∼coesyl-p/principle4-article1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi:10.2307/1164588
   Google Scholar
• Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. C. (1991). Notetaking from textbooks: Effects of a columnar format on three categories of secondary students. Exceptionality, 2, 19–40. doi:10.1080/09362839109524764
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., & Suritsky, S. K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20–24. doi:10.1177/002221949402700105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2009). An investigation of the SOAR study method. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 602–629. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ880569
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D., Speroni, C., Belfield, C., Jaggars, S. S., & Edgecombe, N. (2010). A model for accelerating academic success of community college remedial English students: Is the Accelerated Learning Program (ALP) effective and affordable? CCRC Working Paper No. 21. New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 119–133. doi:10.1080/00220970009598498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A. (1987). Note taking and review: The research and its implications. Journal of Instructional Science, 16, 233–249. doi:10.1007/BF00120252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between levels of notetaking and achievement. Human Learning, 3, 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477. doi:10.1080/01443410500342070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43. doi:10.1080/00220480009596759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landrum, R. E. (2010). Faculty and student perceptions of providing instructor lecture notes to students: Match or mismatch? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(3), 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• *Lazarus, B. D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and post secondary students with mild disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 272–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Machemer, P., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 9–30. doi:10.1177/1469787407074008
   Google Scholar
• Maydosz, A., & Raver, S. A. (2010). Note taking and university students with learning difficulties: What supports are needed? Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 177–186. doi:10.1037/a0020297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moust, J. H. C., Van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50, 665–683. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6371-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. M., & Cross, V. (2002). Should students get the instructor's lecture notes? Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology), 36(2), 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Narjaikaew, P., Emarat, N., & Cowie, B. (2009). The effect of guided note taking during lectures on Thai university students' understanding of electromagnetism. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27, 75–94. doi:10.1080/02635140802658917
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1993). Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 116–125. doi:10.1080/00220973.1993.9943856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmatier, R. A. (1973). A notetaking system for learning. Journal of Reading, 17, 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauk, W. (1989). How to study in college (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 167–180. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peverly, S. T., & Sumowski, J. F. (2012). What variables predict quality of text notes and are text notes related to performance on different types of tests? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 104–117. doi:10.1002/acp.1802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312. doi:10.1002/acp.1086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachal, K. C., Daigle, S., & Rachal, W. S. (2007). Learning problems reported by college students: Are they using learning strategies? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 191–199.
   Google Scholar
• *Rahmani, M., & Sadeghi, K. (2011). Effects of note-taking training on reading comprehension and recall. The Reading Matrix, 11, 116–128.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodology. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 25–31. doi:10.3102/0013189X034005025
   Google Scholar
• *Robinson, D. H., Katayama, A. D., Beth, A., Odom, S., Hsieh, Y. P., & Vanderveen, A. (2006). Increasing text comprehension and graphic note taking using a partial graphic organizer. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 103–111. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.2.103-111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saski, J., Spicewood, P., & Carter, J. (1983). Notetaking formats for learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 265–272. doi:10.2307/1510437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Spires, H. A. (1992). Learning from a lecture: Effects of comprehension monitoring. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 19–30. doi:10.1080/19388079309558113
   Google Scholar
• Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1046
   Google Scholar
• *Tsai, T. S., & Wu, Y. (2010). Effects of note-taking instruction and note-taking languages on college EFL students' listening comprehension. New Horizons in Education, 58, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., & Gonen, O. (2011). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0). [Web-based application]. Retrieved from http://www.singlecaseresearch.org/calculators/tau-u
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173–199. doi:10.1353/jge.2003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Zeidenberg, M., Cho, S-.W., & Jenkins, D. (2010). Washington state's integrated basic education and skills training program (I-BEST): New evidence of effectiveness (CCRC Working Paper No. 20). Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications
   Google Scholar
• Zusho, A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1081–1094. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar