Who Benefits From a Foundational Logic Course? Effects on Undergraduate Course Performance

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. doi:10.3102/0034654314551063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. doi:10.3102/0034654308326084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACT. (2013). The reality of college readiness 2013: National. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/Reality-of-College-Readiness-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2015). Critical thinking and/or argumentation in higher education. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 49–63). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (1999). Empirical strategies in labor economics. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1277–1366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. doi:10.2307/2297968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Astleitner, H. (2002). Teaching critical thinking. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(2), 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2008). Deductive reasoning: In the eye of the beholder. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 235–247. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9136-2
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, A. (2015). What is informal logic? In F. van Eemeren & B Garseen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation (pp. 27–43). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G., Kitmitto, S., Ogut, B., Sherman, D., & Chan, D. (2015). School composition and the Black-White achievement gap. NCES 2015–018. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. H., & Cundiff, N. L. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a college freshman seminar using propensity score adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 616–639. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9208-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2010). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2011). Crosswalk analysis of deeper learning skills to common core state standards. Educational Policy Improvement Center (NJ1).
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2015). A New Era for Educational Assessment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, n8. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.1983
   Google Scholar
• Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2013). Introduction to logic. New International Edition ed. London: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Couzijn, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2004). Learning to read and write argumentative text by observation of peer learners. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 14. Effective learning and teaching of writing. A handbook of writing in education (2nd ed., pp. 241–258). Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Herman, J., & Pellegrino, J. (2013). Criteria for high-quality assessment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wilhoit, G., & Pittenger, L. (2014). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, n86. doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n86.2014
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.697878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2006). An ‘infusion’ approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 179–193. doi:10.1080/07294360600610420
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). What is critical thinking in higher education? In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 27–29). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P., Quinlan, T., & Kostin, I. (2011). Automated scoring within a developmental, cognitive model of writing proficiency (ETS Research Report No. RR-11-16). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P., Quinlan, T., Odendahl, N., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. CBAL literature review writing (ETS Research Report No. RR-08-55). Princeton, NJ: ETS. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02141.x
   Google Scholar
• Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1–24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, R. D. (1991). An empirical taxonomy of critical thinking. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18(2), 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, A. D., & Thomas, J. (2017). The effects of Greek affiliation on academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 57, 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. doi:10.1080/03057260208560187
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. (2015). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 49–63). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.49.8.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, C. A. (2013). Academic mindsets as a critical component of deeper learning. University of Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, G. T., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(1), 34–45. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.120.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G., Jr., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gensler, H. J. (2012). Introduction to logic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 69–110. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (2013). A practical study of argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Foster, G. (2003). Public high school graduation and college readiness rates in the United States (Manhattan Institute, Center for Civic Information, Education Working Paper, No. 3). New York: Manhattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, D. L. (2011). Which test? Whose scores? Comparing standardized critical thinking tests. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(149), 29–39. doi:10.1002/ir.378
   Google Scholar
• Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions on economics students' reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving students' critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 518–530. doi:10.1002/acp.3025
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, P. (2014). A concise introduction to logic. Boston: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ikuenobe, P. (2001). Teaching and assessing critical thinking abilities as outcomes in an informal logic course. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 19–35. doi:10.1080/13562510020029572
   Google Scholar
• Jaschik, S. (2016). The Shrinking Humanities Major. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/14/study-shows-87-decline-humanities-bachelors-degrees-2-years
   Google Scholar
• Jaschik, S. (2017). Humanities Majors Drop. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/06/05/analysis-finds-significant-drop-humanities-majors-gains-liberal-arts-degrees
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. H. (2014). The rise of informal logic: Essays on argumentation, critical thinking, reasoning and politics (Vol. 2). Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(43), 18243–18250. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012933107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., Khemlani, S. S., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(4), 201–214. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2015). A disciplined approach to critical thinking. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 169–182). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan
   Google Scholar
• Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The collegiate learning assessment: Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review, 31(5), 415–439. doi:10.1177/0193841X07303318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson's Research Reports. Retrieved in 2016, March, from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. (2009). Improving students’ evaluation of informal arguments. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339–366. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, M., Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. (2004). Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology, 25(3), 205–224. doi:10.1080/02702710490489908
   Google Scholar
• Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 45–61). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2010). Strategies to read and learn: Overcoming learning by consumption. Medical Education, 44(4), 340–346. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03550.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2014). Counterfactuals and causal inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., Devine, A., Nobes, A., & Szűcs, D. (2013). The link between logic, mathematics and imagination: Evidence from children with developmental dyscalculia and mathematically gifted children. Developmental Science, 16(4), 542–553. doi:10.1111/desc.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board (2015). Reading Framework for the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Available online: http://www.nagb.org/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/reading/2015-reading-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Common Core of Data Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey: School Year 2001 to 2014. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
   Google Scholar
• Niu, L., Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Garvan, C. W. (2013). Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 114–128. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (2004). The State of Critical Thinking Today: The Need for a Substantive Concept of Critical Thinking. Available from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-state-ofcritical-thinking-today/523.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Permzadian, V., & Credé, M. (2016). Do first-year seminars improve college grades and retention? A quantitative review of their overall effectiveness and an examination of moderators of effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 277–316. doi:10.3102/0034654315584955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T. (2013). A meta-analysis of academic success courses in postsecondary institutions (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3572090)
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891. doi:10.3102/0002831209333184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 39–67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2002). The argument schema and learning to reason. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 319–334). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., & Kuo, L. J. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449–472. doi:10.1086/518623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutschow, E. Z., Cullinan, D., & Welbeck, R. (2012). Keeping students on course: An impact study of a student success course at Guilford Technical Community College. New York: MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Goettingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers..
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, M. (2012). Introduction to logic and critical thinking (6th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson E., & Courtney, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8(2), 89–98. doi:10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00340.x
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 250–267. doi:10.1037/a0018719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. (n.d.). About Carnegie classification. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Lok, B. (2015). Teaching critical thinking: An operational framework. In The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 93–105). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2013). Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review of intervention studies. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 1–17. doi:10.5539/hes.v4n1p1
   Google Scholar
• Tobolowsky, B. F. & Associates. (2008). 2006 National Survey of First-Year Seminars: Continuing innovations in the collegiate curriculum (Monograph No. 51). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
   Google Scholar
• van Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–46. doi:10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48
   Google Scholar
• van Gelder, T. (2015). Using argument mapping to improve critical thinking skills. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 169–182). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Cultivating expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 142–152. doi:10.1037/h0085794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. (2001). Concept of competence. A conceptual clarification. In D. Rychen & L. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–66). Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.
   Google Scholar
• West, S. G., & Thoemmes, F. (2010). Campbell’s and Rubin’s perspectives on causal inference. Psychological Methods, 15(1), 18–37. doi:10.1037/a0015917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2016). First Year Experience Courses. WWC Intervention Report. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Intervention/8
   Google Scholar