Pair Programming in Perspective: Effects on Persistence, Achievement, and Equity in Computer Science

References

• Ally, M., Darroch, F., & Toleman, M. (2005). A framework for understanding the factors influencing pair programming success. In H. Baumeister, M. Marchesi, & M. Holcombe (Eds.), Extreme programming and agile processes in software engineering (Vol. 3556, pp. 82–91). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balijepally, V. G., Mahapatra, R. K., Nerur, S., & Price, K. H. (2009). Are two heads better than one for software development? The productivity paradox of pair programming. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, L. J., McDowell, C., & Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508923
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org
   Google Scholar
• Begel, A., & Nagappan, N. (2008). Pair programming: What’s in it for me? In Proceedings of the second ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement – ESEM ’08 (pp. 120–128). ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J., Werner, L., & McDowell, C. (2002). Guidelines for the use of pair programming in a freshman programming class (pp. 100–107). IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003). Gender differences in computer science students. In SIGCSE '03: Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, Reno, NV (pp. 49–53).
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
   Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., Brauer, A., & Yilmaz, T. (2008). Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors vs. CS leavers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352322.1352274
   Google Scholar
• Bipp, T., Lepper, A., & Schmedding, D. (2008). Pair programming in software development teams – An empirical study of its benefits. Information and Software Technology, 50(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 29–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310383047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., & Culver, K. (2018). Promoting equity and student learning: Rigor in undergraduate academic experiences. In C. M. Campbell (Ed.), Reframing notions of rigor: Building scaffolding for equity and student success (New Directions for Higher Education,. no. 181, pp. 47–57). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20270
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., Jarratt, L., Culver, K., & Segre, A. M. (2019a). How prior pair programming experience affects students’ pair programming experiences and outcomes [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Aberdeen, Scotland, 170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., Jarratt, L., Culver, K., & Segre, A. M. (2019b). The impact of pair programming on interest, perceptions, and achievement in computer science [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., Jarratt, L., Culver, K., & Segre, A. M. (2020). (Mis)match of students’ country of origin and the impact of collaborative learning in computer science. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Paper #30150).
   Google Scholar
• Braught, G., Wahls, T., & Eby, L. M. (2011). The case for pair programming in the computer science classroom. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1921607.1921609
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, S. (2004). Double trouble: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods in the study of eXtreme programmers. In 2004 IEEE symposium on visual languages – Human centric computing (pp. 55–61). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, S., Romero, P., & Du Boulay, B. (2008). Pair programming and the mysterious role of the navigator. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., & Xu, P. (2005). Activity patterns of pair programming. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. J., Milem, J. F., & Antonio, A. L. (2011). Campus climate and diversity. In J. H. Schuh, S. R. Jones, S. R. Harper, & S. R. Komives (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed., pp. 43–58). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chaparro, E. A., Yuksel, A., Romero, P., & Bryant, S. (2005). Factors affecting the perceived effectiveness of pair programming in higher education. 17th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Sussex University, June 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigona, W., & Pollock, M. (2008). Pair programming for information systems students new to programming: Students’ experiences and teachers’ challenges. In PICMET ’08 – 2008 Portland international conference on management of engineering & technology (pp. 1587–1594). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., & Yu, H. (2015). Roles of university support for international students in the United States: Analysis of a systematic model of university identification, university support, and psychological well-being. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314533606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K. S., Deek, F. P., & Im, I. (2008). Exploring the underlying aspects of pair programming: The impact of personality. Information and Software Technology, 50(11), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliburn, D. C. (2003). Experiences with pair programming at a small college. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19(1), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, I. D., Robillard, P. N., Sillitti, A., & Succi, G. (2014). Cooperation, collaboration and pair-programming: Field studies on backup behavior. Journal of Systems and Software, 91, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, M. (2015, October 22). The real reason U.S. students lag behind in computer science. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2015/10/22/u-s-students-computer-science/
   Google Scholar
• Dyba, T., Arisholm, E., Sjoberg, D. I. K., Hannay, J. E., & Shull, F. (2007). Are two heads better than one? On the effectiveness of pair programming. IEEE Software, 24(6), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2007.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faja, S. (2011). Pair programming as a team based learning activity: A review of research. Issues in Information Systems, XII, (2), 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, B., Fitzgerald, S., McCauley, R., Murphy, L., & Zander, C. (2011). Pair programming in education: A literature review. Computer Science Education, 21(2), 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2011.579808
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, B., McDowell, C., Draper, D., & Krnjajic, M. (2004). Program quality with pair programming in CS. Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on innovation and technology computer science education, Leeds, UK (pp. 176–180).
   Google Scholar
• Hannay, J. E., Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2009). The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis. Information and Software Technology, 51(7), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R. (2010). An anti‐deficit achievement framework for research on Students of Color in STEM. In S. R. Harper & C. B. Newman (Eds.), Students of Color in STEM (New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 148, pp. 63–74). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.362
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. W., Slaten, K. M., Williams, L. A., & Berenson, S. B. (2004). Examining the impact of pair programming on female students [NCSU CSC Technical Report 2004-20]. Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. P. (2016). Regression models for categorical, count, and related variables: An applied approach. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. V. (2006). Attitudes on using pair-programming. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.2190/5K87-58W8-G07M-2811
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2018). Mediation. http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppuswami, S., & Vivekanandan, K. (2004). The effects of pair programming on learning efficiency in short programming assignments. Informatics in Education, 2, 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning: Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H., & Xin, W. (2011). An experimental research of the pair programming in java programming course. In Proceeding of the international conference on e-education, entertainment and e-management (pp. 257–260). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Layman, L. (2006). Changing students perceptions: An analysis of the supplementary benefits of collaborative software development. 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training, Turtle Bay, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science (New York, N.Y.), 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Wu, S., Fang, X., & Brunsting, N. (2019). International students’ perceived language competence, domestic student support, and psychological well-being at a US university. Journal of International Students, 9(4), 954–971. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v0i0.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcom, S., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, E., & Spieth, A. (2012). Team-based learning in a subsection of a veterinary course as compared to standard lectures. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., With Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2016). How college affects students. (Vol. 3): 21st century evidence that higher education works. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H. E., & Fernald, J. (2006). Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Communications of the ACM, 49(8), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/1145287.1145293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, E. O., Thakore, B. K., & LaBlance, S. S. (2017). The burden of being “model”: Racialized experiences of Asian STEM college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, E., Al-Fakhri, L. B., & Luxton-Reilly, A. (2006). A replicated experiment of pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, Bologna, Italy (pp. 108–112). https://doi.org/10.1145/1140124.1140155
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. C. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority students’ success in STEM education. Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nagappan, N., Williams, L., Ferzli, M., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Miller, C., & Balik, S. (2003). Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.612006
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, J. T. (1998). The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 41(3), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/272287.272333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P., Lonner, W. J., Draguns, J. G., Trimble, J. E., & Scharrón-del Río, M. R. (Eds.). (2016). Counseling across cultures (7th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonka, L., Sharp, H., & van der Linden, J. (2012). Disengagement in pair programming: Does it matter?. In 2012 34th international conference on software engineering (ICSE) (pp. 496–506). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Preszler, R. W. (2009). Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-01-0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning: Gender-related differences in CMC and CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00224.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, N., Mendes, E., & Grundy, J. (2011). Empirical studies of pair programming for CS/SE teaching in higher education: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2010.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017). Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 258–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfetsos, P., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., & Deligiannis, I. (2009). An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. M., Wagner, A., & Killion, B. (2017). Gender and choosing a STEM major in college: Feminity, masculinity, chilly climate, and occupational values. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Kalvala, S. (2015). Exploring societal factors affecting the experience and engagement of first year female computer science undergraduates [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 15th Koli calling conference on computing education research – Koli Calling ’15, Koli, Finland (pp. 107–116). https://doi.org/10.1145/2828959.2828979
   Google Scholar
• Singer, N. (2019, January 24). The hard part of computer science? Getting into class. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/24/technology/computer-science-courses-college.html
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. The American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M., & Rosenberg, D. (2003). Extreme programming refactored: The case against XP. Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2012). Learning about academic ability and the college dropout decision. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(4), 707–748. https://doi.org/10.1086/666525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., Ratcliffe, M., & Robertson, A. (2003). Code warriors and code-a-phobes: A study in attitude and pair programming [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 363–367).
   Google Scholar
• Tomcho, T. J., & Foels, R. (2012). Meta-analysis of group learning activities: Empirically based teaching recommendations. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umapathy, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2017). A meta-analysis of pair-programming in computer programming courses: Implications for educational practice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17(4), 11–16. 13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2996201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDeGrift, T. (2004). Coupling pair programming and writing: Learning about students’ perceptions and processes. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971306
   Google Scholar
• Varma, R. (2006). Making computer science minority-friendly. Communications of the ACM, 49(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/1113034.1113041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vee, A. (2013). Understanding computer programming as a literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.21623/1.1.2.4
   Google Scholar
• Vitores, A., & Gil-Juárez, A. (2016). The trouble with ‘women in computing’: A critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, E. N., Williams, L., Petlick, J., Nagappan, N., Balik, S., Miller, C., Ferzli, M. (2003). Pair programming in introductory programming labs. In Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., & Kessler, R. (2002). Pair programming illuminated. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Layman, L., Osborne, J., & Katira, N. (2006). Examining the compatibility of student pair programmers. In AGILE 2006 (AGILE’06) (pp. 411–420). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., McCrickard, D. S., Layman, L., & Hussein, K. (2008). Eleven guidelines for implementing pair programming in the classroom. In AGILE 2008 (AGILE’08) (pp. 445–452). IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., McDowell, C., Nagappan, N., Fernald, J., Werner, L. (2003, September). Building pair programming knowledge through a family of experiments. In 2003 International symposium on empirical software engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings (pp. 143–152). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., & Upchurch, R. L. (2001). In support of student pair-programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(1), 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1145/366413.364614
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Ferzli, M., & Miller, C. (2002). In support of pair programming in the introductory computer science course. Computer Science Education, 12(3), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.3.197.8618
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, B. (2015). Careers “from” science but not “in” science: Why are aspirations to be a scientist challenging for minority ethnic students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education – SIGCSE ’11, Dallas, TX (p. 465). https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297
   Google Scholar
• Yao, C. W., George Mwangi, C. A., & Malaney Brown, V. K. (2019). Exploring the intersection of transnationalism and critical race theory: A critical race analysis of international student experiences in the United States. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1497968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharis, N. Z. (2011). Measuring the effects of virtual pair programming in an introductory programming java course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2048328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar