Success for All: A Quantitative Synthesis of U.S. Evaluations

References

• **A double asterisk indicates studies included in the main meta-analysis (final reports).
   Google Scholar
• *A single asterisk indicates studies included in the exploratory meta-analysis (interim reports).
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Murray, M. S., Munger, K. A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there effects a decade later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., & Hewes, G. M. (2002). The long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of Success for All. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. C. K., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2007). Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of Success for All. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 701–731. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2016). Literacy and language outcomes of balanced and developmental-constructivist approaches to early childhood education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 18, 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Chambers, B., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Cheung, A., & Gifford, R. (2005). Enhancing Success for All for Hispanic students: Effects on beginning reading achievement. Success for All Foundation. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED485350
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Moffitt, S. L. (2009). The ordeal of equality: Did federal regulation fix the schools? Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• **Correnti, R. (2009). Examining CSR program effects on student achievement: Causal explanation through examination of implementation rates and student mobility [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC, March, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Datnow, A., Stringfield, S., Borman, G., Rachuba, L., & Castellano, M. (2001). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a 4-year study. Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41 (1), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2018). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (2007a). Correcting a significance test for clustering. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998606298040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (2007b). Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(4), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998606298043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesnick, J., Goerge, R., Smithgall, C., & Gwynne, J. (2010). Reading on grade level in third grade: How is it related to high school performance and college enrollment? Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• **Livingston, M., & Flaherty, J. (1997). Effects of Success for All on reading achievement in California schools. WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (2017). Evaluations of technology-assisted small-group tutoring for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1255577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., Karweit, N. L., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Success for All: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030001123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Muñoz, M. A., Dossett, D., & Judy-Gullans, K. (2004). Educating students placed at risk: Evaluating the impct of Success for All in urban settings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr0903_3.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2019). The condition of education 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4754). http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/pages/report.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Neitzel, A., Cheung, A. C., Xie, C., Zhuang, T., & Slavin, R. (2020). Data associated with the publication: Success for All: A quantitative synthesis of U. S. evaluations (V1 ed.). Johns Hopkins University Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Neitzel, A., Lake, C., Pellegrini, M., & Slavin, R. (2020). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. (Manuscript submitted for publication). www.bestevidence.org.
   Google Scholar
• **Nunnery, J. A., Slavin, R., Ross, S., Smith, L., Hunter, P., & Stubbs, J. (1996). An assessment of Success for All program component configuration effects on the reading achievement of at-risk first grade students [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 technical report. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peurach, D. J. (2011). Seeing complexity in public education: Problems, possibilities, and Success for All. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/747736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. (2020). Clubsandwich: Cluster-Robust (Sandwich) Variance Estimators with Small-Sample Corrections (Version R package version 0.4.1) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich
   Google Scholar
• **Quint, J., Zhu, P., Balu, R., Rappaport, S., & DeLaurentis, M. (2015). Scaling up the Success for All model of school reform: Final report from the Investing in Innovation (i3) evaluation. MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., & Casey, J. (1998a). Longitudinal study of student literacy achievement in different Title I school-wide programs in Ft. Wayne community schools, year 2: First grade results. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Center for Research on Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• *Ross, S. M., & Casey, J. (1998b). Success for all evaluation, 1997–98 tigard-tualatin school district. Memphis: University of Memphis, Center for Research on Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., Nunnery, J. A., & Smith, L. J. (1996). Evaluation of Title I reading programs: Amphitheater public schools year 1: 1995–1996. University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., & Bond, C. (1994). An evaluation of the Success for All program in Montgomery, Alabama schools. University of Memphis, Center for Research on Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., & Casey, J. P. (1995). Final Report: 1994–1995 Success for All program in Fort Wayne, Indiana. University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., & Casey, J. P. (1997). Preventing early school failure: Impacts of Success for All on standardized tests outcomes, minority group performance, and school effectiveness. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr0201_4
   Google Scholar
• *Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Casey, J. P., Johnson, B., & Bond, C. (1994b). Using Success for All to restructure elementary schools: A tale of four cities [Paper presentation]. At the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373456)
   Google Scholar
• **Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lewis, T., & Nunnery, J. (1996). 1995–96 evaluation of Roots & Wings in Memphis City Schools. University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., Miller, R., & Camburn, E. (2009). School improvement by design: Lessons from a study of comprehensive school reform programs. http://www.cpre.org/school-improvement-design-lessons-study-comprehensive-school-reform-programs.
   Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, J. (2020). Overcoming dyslexia (2nd ed.). Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2017). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391–1466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Chambers, B., & Haxby, B. (2009). Two million children: Success for All. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• **Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Success for All in the Baltimore City Public Schools: Year 6 report. Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students.
   Google Scholar
• **Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., Wasik, B. A., Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. J. (1994). Success for All: Longitudinal effects of systemic school-by-school reform in seven districts [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/747701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Wang, W., & Ross, S. M. (1999). Results for Success for All program. University of Memphis, Center for Research on Educational Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, R., Morrison, J. M., Inns, A., Slavin, R. E., & Risman, K. (2020). Average effect sizes in developer-commissioned and independent evaluations. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Review protocol for beginning reading interventions version 3.0. Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). Standards handbook (version 4.1). Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar