Engaging Second-grade English Learners in Complex Texts, Topics, and Tasks

References

• Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., & Richardson, N. (2005). Students, tasks, and emotions: Identifying the contributions of emotions to students’ reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning And Instruction, 15(5), 433–447. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., Howell, P. B., & Vidrio Magaña, M. (2016). Accessing the classroom discourse community through accountable talk: English learners’ voices. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 667–699. doi:10.1002/tesj.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M., & Schuldt, L. C. (2015). Children’s perceptions of their reading ability and epistemic roles in monologically and dialogically organized bilingual classrooms. Journal Of Literacy Research, 47(1), 115–145. doi:10.1177/1086296X15586959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., … Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in Elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from NCEE website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: Variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition Learning, 10, 99–117. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. G., Boele, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2017). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 1–21. Online, doi:10.1002/rrq.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research In The Teaching Of English, 49(3), 272–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., DiPardo, A. L., & Staley, S. J. (2014). Entering the conversation: Exploratory talk in middle school science. The Elementary School Journal, 114(4), 547–572. doi:10.1086/675638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378–411. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Xu, Y., & Rhodes, J. A. (2010). Examining English language learners’ motivation of, and engagement in, reading: A qualitative study. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding students’ compprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 570–580. doi:10.1598/RT.58.6.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English-language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher education quarterly, 32(2), 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Comprehension instruction in the primary grades. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices (pp. 247–258). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, L. W., & Fillmore, C. J. (2012). Understanding language: What does text complexity mean for English learners and language minority students? Retrieved from http://ELL.stanford.edu/publication/what-does-text-complexity-mean-english-learners-and-language-minority-students
   Google Scholar
• Foundation, C. K. (2013). Fighting for a cause. Tell it again! Read-aloud anthology, Grade 2. Core Knowledge Language Arts New York Edition. Retrieved from: https://www.engageny.org/file/27616/download/ckla_g2_d12_anth_engage.pdf?token=_fNZ1oRS
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. (Under cooperative agreement grant S283B050034 for U.S. Department of Education). Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Available online at http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/ELL1-Interventions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review Of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2010). Identifying instructional moves during guided learning. The Reading Teacher, 64(2), 84–95. doi:10.1598/RT.64.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangi, J. M. (2008). The unbearable whiteness of literacy instruction: Realizing the implications of the proficient reader research. Multicultural review, 17(1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (2011). Best practices in motivating students to read. In L. M. Morrow & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 177–198). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. I. Christenson, S. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the background to the foreground: What do classroom environments that support authentic discussions look like? American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 370–399. doi:10.3102/0002831207302173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English-language learners. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152–162. doi:10.1598/JAAL.48.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, A. M., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2007). A formative experiment investigating literacy engagement among adolescent Latina/o students just beginning to read, write and speak English. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 512–545. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. The American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (6th edn., pp. 807–839). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, C. M., & Ford-Connors, E. Helping students find their voice: Teacher talk that supports young emergent bilinguals’ participation in exploratory discourse. Presented at annual LRA conference, Indian Wells, CA, November 30, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, C. M., Ford-Connors, E., Robertson, D. A., Wyatt, J., Wagner, C. J., Proctor, C. P., & Paratore, J. R. (2018). “Let’s FaceTime tonight:” Using digital tools to enhance coaching. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 39–49. doi:10.1002/trtr.1676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., & Geva, E. (2006). Synthesis: Development of literacy in language-minority students. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth (pp. 53–74). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lightner, S. C., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2017). Instructional frameworks for quality talk about text: Choosing the best approach. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 435–444. doi:10.1002/trtr.1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, S. R., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom environments that foster a disposition for critical thinking. Learning Environments Research, 14, 59–73. doi:10.1007/s10984-011-9082-2
   Google Scholar
• McElhone, D. (2013). Pressing for elaboration in talk about texts. Journal Of Classroom Interaction, 48, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., … Bullock Mann, F. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved [date] from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal Of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.2004.1.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. doi:10.1080/0141192990250107
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable Talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies In Philosophy And Education, 27(4), 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Accountable talk sourcebook: For classroom conversation that works. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Institute for Learning.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, appendix A. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2014). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/#faq-2303http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ossa-Parra, M., Wagner, C., Proctor, C. P., Leighton, C. M., Robertson, D. A., Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2016). Dialogic reasoning: Supporting emergent bilinguals’ language and literacy development. In E. Hiebert, A. Boardman, & C. P. Proctor (Eds.), Teaching emergent bilingual students: Flexible approaches in an era of new standards (pp. 119–137). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., August, D., Snow, C. E., & Barr, C. (2010). The interdependence continuum: A perspective on the nature of Spanish-English bilingual reading comprehension. Bilingual Research Journal, 33(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/15235881003733209
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., Daley, S., Louick, R., Leider, C. M., & Garner, G. L. (2014). How motivation and engagement predict reading comprehension among native English-speaking and English-learning middle school students with disabilities in a remedial reading curriculum. Learning And Individual Differences, 36, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V. (2012). Epistemological tensions in reading research and a vision for the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 465–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal Of Education, 39(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/03057640802701952
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. A., Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2014). Coaching teachers’ talk during vocabulary and comprehension instruction. Language Arts, 91(6), 416–428.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, T. (2008). How can teacher talk support learning? Linguistics And Education, 19(132), 148. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. doi:10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., & Ucceli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., Townsend, D., & Boynton, M. J. (2013). Mediating effects of reading engagement on the reading comprehension of early adolescent English language learners. Reading Research Quarterly. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.741959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada Barber, A., & Smith, P. (2016). Energizing reading: Engagement in teaching and learning. In C. P. Proctor, A. Boardman, & E. H. Hiebert (Eds.), Teaching emergent bilingual students: Flexible approaches in an era of new standards. (pp. 157–178). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada Barber, A., Gallagher, M., Smith, P., Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2016). Examining student cognitive and affective engagement and reading instructional activities: Spanish-speaking English learners’ reading profiles. Literacy Research And Instruction, 55(3), 209–236. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19388071.2016.1167987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M., SaizdeLaMora, K., Martin, A. D., & Mills, T. (2018). Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 138–155. doi:10.1080/00131725.2018.1420850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIDA Consortium. (2014). 2012 Amplification of the English language development standards, Kindergarten–Grade 12. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Available: https://www.wida.us/get.aspx?id=540
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology In The Schools, 45(5), 432–445. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Crosson, A. C., & Resnick, L. B. (2005). Classroom talk for rigorous reading comprehension instruction. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 27–53. doi:10.1080/02702710490897518
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Niu, C., Munawar, S., & Anderson, R. C. (2016). What makes a more proficient discussion group in English language learners’ classrooms? Influence of teacher talk and student backgrounds. Research In The Teaching Of English, 51(2), 183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar