Combining Strategy Instruction and Principles of Dialogic Pedagogy to Support Primary-Grade Students Story Writing: Results from Cycle 1 of Design Research

References

• Adkins, M. H., & Gavins, M. V. (2012). self-regulated strategy development and generalization instruction: Effects on story writing and personal narratives among students with severe emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 20(4), 235–249. doi:10.1080/09362835.2012.724625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). New York, NY: Dialogos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). 2009. Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 516.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., … Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1–46. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebee, A., Langer, J., Jenkins, L., Mullis, I., & Foertsch, M. (1990). Learning to write in our nations’ schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1991). The art of rhetoric ( H. Lawson-Tancred, trans.). London, UK: Penguin Classics. ISBN: 9780140445107.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro-Saddler, K. (2014). Self-regulated strategy development: Effects on writers with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 78–91. ISSN: 2154-1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaro-Saddler, K., & Saddler, B. (2010). Planning instruction and self-regulation training: Effects on writers with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 77(1), 107–124. doi:10.1177/001440291007700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson, Trans., M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.2307/40136453
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story map instruction using children’s literature: Effects on first graders’ comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 407–437. doi:10.1080/10862969309547828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. B., & Dexter, E. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. doi:10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. doi:10.1086/448619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, H., & Moore, B. H. (1991). The art of writing: Drawing as preparation for narrative writing in the primary grades. Studies in Art Education, 32(4), 207–219. doi:10.2307/1320873
   Google Scholar
• Coker, D., & MacArthur, C. A. (2011). Investigating the impact of classroom instruction and literacy skills on writing achievement in elementary schools. Proposal funded by the Institute for Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education (4 years, $1,450,000). R305A110484
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.) (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-415-57700-7.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. doi:10.1598/rrq.35.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337–372. doi:10.3102/00028312028002337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Lee Shiegel, D., & Teasley, A. (1987). Story structure and writing. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 22(3), 255–262. doi:10.1177/105345128702200304
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(6), 424–432. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale,IL: Southern Illinois University Press: . ISBN: 978-0809319015.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds..), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written composition (Vol. 2, pp. 39–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 0-89859-158-9.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781462529315.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). It can be taught, but it does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(3), 414–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 781–792. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Reid, R., & Mason, L. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187–202). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch12
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Problematic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 251–262. doi:10.1080/09362835.2012.747180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 6, 113–135. doi:10.1348/978185409X422542
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and Self-regulated strategy development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40(5), 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340. doi:10.3102/00028312043002295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., Driscoll, S. A., Graham, S., Wilson, K., Sandmel, K., … Schatschneider, C. (2012). Tier 1, teacher-implemented self-regulated strategy development for students with and without behavioral challenges: A randomized controlled trial. Elementary School Journal, 113(2), 160–191. doi:10.1086/667403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28–40). New York, NY: Guilford Press. ISBN 9781462529315.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (2004). 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2018). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K., Graham, S., Harris, K., Little, M., Sandmel, K., & Brindle, M. (2010). Story writing. The Journal of Special Education, 44(2), 107–128. doi:10.1177/0022466908331044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Harris, K., Graham, S., Driscoll, S., Sandmel, K., Morphy, P., … Schatschneider, C. (2011). Self-regulated strategy development at tier 2 for second-grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(4), 322–353. doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.558987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J. L., Brindle, M., & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 234–253. doi:10.1177/0022466908331044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienemann, T. O., Graham, S., Leader-Janssen, B., & Reid, R. (2006). Improving the writing performance of struggling writers in second grade. Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 66–78. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarthur, C., & Philippakos, Z. (2010). Instruction in a strategy for compare–Contrast writing. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 438–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A. (2011). Strategies instruction. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook, Vol. 3, Applications of educational psychology to learning and teaching (pp. 379–401). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13275-000
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111–191. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J., & Geoghegan, C. M. (2016). The role of professional development for enhancing writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (2nd ed., (pp. 330–348). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K., Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Brown, M. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1105–1140. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. doi:10.1080/09500780902954273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. H., & Caldwell, H. (1993). Drama and drawing for narrative writing in primary grades. Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 100–110. doi:10.1080/00220671.1993.9941173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21(1), 19–41. doi:10.1080/02671520500445425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National assessment of educational progress. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566. doi:10.3102/0002831208328088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco,CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (2006). The social and historical context of writing research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11–27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, G. (1983). The gradual release of responsibility model of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 112–123.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2017). Giving feedback: Preparing students for peer review and self-evaluation. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 13–22. doi:10.1002/trtr.2017.71.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. (2018). Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 107–114. doi:10.1002/trtr.1690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016a). The effects of giving feedback on the persuasive writing of fourth- and fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 419–433. doi:10.1002/rrq.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016b). The use of genre-specific evaluation criteria for revision. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 26(1), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2017, December). Results of a year-long writing professional development model. Paper presented at the Literacy Research Association Conference, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (in press). Developing strategic, young writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades K-2. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., MacArthur, C. A., & Coker, D. L. (2015). Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades 3–5. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., & Moore, N. (2017). The literacy coach’s role in supporting teachers’ implementation of the common core state standards in writing. In S. Lawrence (Ed.), Literacy program evaluation and development initiatives for P-12 teaching (pp. 114–137). IGI-Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0669-0.ch007
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2004). Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In N. Duke & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methods (pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). On formative and design experiments. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2018). Accountable talk: Instructional dialogue that builds the mind. The International Academy of Education (IAE) and the International Bureau of Education (IBE) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000262675
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice gap. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 17–27. doi:10.3102/0013189x027001017
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Brown & A. Collins (Eds..), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). On evaluating story grammars. Cognitive Science, 4(3), 313–316. doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(80)80007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddler, B. (2016). Increasing story-writing ability through self-regulated strategy development: Effects on young writers with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4), 291–305. doi:10.2307/30035555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 225–235. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, D. C., Kameenui, E. J., Dickson, S., Chard, D., Gunn, B., & Baker, S. (1994). Integrating narrative reading comprehension and writing instruction for all learners. National Reading Conference (pp. 572–582). USA, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, M. (1993). The social nature of written text: A research-based review and summary of conceptual issues in the teaching of writing (Concept Paper Series). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, M. (1996). Revisiting the writing-speaking connection: Challenges for research on writing and writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 53–86. doi:10.3102/00346543066001053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes (Vol. 2): New directions in discourse processing (pp. 1–68). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. J., Van, M. P., & Warcholak, N. D. (2010). The effects of explicitly teaching story structure to primary grade children. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(2), 159–198. doi:10.1080/10862961003796173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. C. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd). London, UK: Sage. ISBN 9780585383323.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 246–280). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Traga Philippakos, Z. (2019). Effects of strategy instruction with an emphasis on oral language and dramatization on the quality of first graders’ procedural writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1–18. (Online publication first). doi:10.1080/10573569.2018.1547233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traga Philippakos, Z., Macarthur, C., & Munsell, S. (2018). Collaborative reasoning with strategy instruction for opinion writing in primary grades: Two cycles of design research. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 485-504. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2018.1480438 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traga Philippakos, Z. A., Howell, E., Voggt, A., & Undergraff, M. (in press). Design based research: Leveraging criteria to define methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Traga Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (in press). Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Common core writing and language standards and aligned state assessments: A national survey of teacher beliefs and attitudes. Reading and Writing, 29(9), 1719–1743. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9650-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education: an International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(1), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, L. M., & Hall-Kenyon, K. M. (2011). Improving young children’s writing: The influence of story structure on kindergartners’ writing complexity. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 272–293. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.514035
   Google Scholar
• Zumbrunn, S., & Bruning, R. (2013). Improving the writing and knowledge of emergent writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 91–110. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9384-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar