Readers of Comics and the Recursive Nature of Adolescent Emotion: Exploring the Productive Relation of Visual Response and Memory in Teacher Education

References

• Barry, L. (1992). My perfect life. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration: Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1050. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkerts, S. (2007). Reading life: Books for the ages. Saint Paul, MN: Graywolf.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. (2012). The adolescent teacher: A psychoanalytic note on regression in the professions. Journal of Infant, Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 11(3), 272–283. doi:10.1080/15289168.2012.700818
   Google Scholar
• Brugar, K. A., Roberts, K. L., Jiménez, L. M., & Meyer, C. K. (2018). More than mere motivation: Learning specific content through multimodal narratives. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(2), 183–208. doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1351586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chute, H. L. (2008). Comics as literature? Reading graphic narrative. PMLA, 123(2), 452–465. doi:10.1632/pmla.2008.123.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Chute, H. L. (2011). Materializing memory: Lynda Barry’s one hundred demons. In M. A. Chaney (Ed.), Graphic subjects: Critical essays on autobiography and graphic novels (pp. 282–309). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. (2017). A sensory sociology of the future: Affect, hope and inventive methodologies. The Sociological Review, 65(3), 525–543. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, S. P. (2012). Weaving multimodal meaning in a graphic novel reading group. Visual Communication, 12(1), 27–53. doi:10.1177/1470357212462812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeForge, M. (2016). Big kids. Montreal, QC: Drawn and Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. (2009). “A necessary part of good teaching”: Using book clubs to develop preservice teachers’ visions of self. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 298–317. doi:10.1080/19388070802433206
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. B., & Low, D. E. (2017). Critical questioning in and beyond the margins: Teacher preparation students’ multimodal inquiries into literacy assessment. English Education, 49(3), 226–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2005). ‘Literacy’ in a multimodal environment of communication. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 91–100). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (2009). This incredible need to believe. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 285–296. doi:10.1177/1468798417715720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The language of psycho-analysis ( D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-C. (2013). An examination of ESL Taiwanese university students’ multimodal reading responses. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(3), 192–203. doi:10.1080/19388071.2013.774449
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Paradox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra Tarc, A. (2015). Literacy of the other: Renarrating humanity. Albany, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. (2010). Developing narrative competence through reading and writing metafictive texts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(3), 264–281. doi:10.1080/19388070903100324
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2006). Side effects. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, A.J. (1998). Qualifying resistance: some comments on methodological dilemmas. International Journal Of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 535-553. doi:10.1080/095183998236449
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (1996). Outside belongings. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
   Google Scholar
• Short, K. G., Kauffman, G., & Kahn, L. H. (2000). ‘I just need to draw’: Responding to literature across multiple sign systems. The Reading Teacher, 54, 160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2017). Unformulated experience, dissociation, and nachträglichkeit. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(4), 501–525. doi:10.1111/1468-5922.12334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 247–257. doi:10.1080/0022027840160304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaki, J., & Tamaki, M. (2014). This one summer. Canada,Toronto: Groundwood.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, M. (2011). I swear I saw this: Drawings in fieldwork notebooks, namely my own. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Versaci, R. (2001). How comic books can change the way our students see literature: One teacher’s perspective. The English Journal, 91(2), 61–67. doi:10.2307/822347
   Google Scholar
• Whitin, P. (1994). Opening potential: Visual response to literature. Language Arts, 71(2), 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G. L. (2006). American born Chinese. New York: First Second.
   Google Scholar
• Zoss, M. (2009). Visual arts and literacy. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 183–196). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar