English Teacher Interpretive Communities: An Exploratory Case Study of Teachers’ Literacy Practices and Pedagogical Reasoning

References

• Bain, R. B. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331–353). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100305
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (1985). A comparison of classroom writing practices, teachers’ perceptions of their writing instruction and textbook recommendations on writing practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 155–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/461440
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Grote-Garcia, S., & Ortlieb, E. (2019). What’s hot in 2019: Expanded and interconnected notions of literacy. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(1), 39–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2019.1665786
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Ortlieb, E., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2018). What’s hot in 2018: Going digital and disciplinary. Literacy Research and Instruction, 58(1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2019.1526860
   Google Scholar
• Commeyras, M., Bisplinghoff, B. S., & Olson, J. (2003). Teachers as readers: Perspectives on the importance of reading in teachers’ classrooms and lives. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P. (2020). Building and justifying interpretations of texts: A key practice in the English language arts. ETS Research Report Series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, M. H. (1996). Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23, 453–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(96)00004-6
   Google Scholar
• Dowdey, D. (1992). Citation and documentation across the curriculum. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 330–351). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (1991). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 77–96). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., … Shanahan, C.; Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
   Google Scholar
• Graff, G. (1987). Professing literature: An institutional history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20, 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90031-J
   Google Scholar
• Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1996). A cognitive study of literary expertise. In R. J. Kruez & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 397–418). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In D. K. Norman & Y. S. Guba (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 2, pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, R. (2010/2011). In praise of amateurism: A friendly critique of Moje’s “call for change” in secondary literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(4), 267–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.4.4
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2018). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., Goldman, S. R., Levine, S., & Magliano, J. (2016). Epistemic cognition in literary reasoning. In J. A. Green, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 165–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lemley, S. M., Hart, S. M., & King, J. R. (2019). Teacher inquiry develops elementary teachers’ disciplinary literacy. Literacy Research and Instruction, 58(1), 12–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1520371
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M., & Giorgis, C. (2009). Narrating and performing identity: Literacy specialists’ writing identities. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(1), 104–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802637604
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially-just subject matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary liieracy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. G., Jacobs, J. S., & Swinyard, W. R. (1999). Do teachers who read personally use recommended literacy practices in their classrooms? Reading Research and Instruction, 38(2), 81–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079909558280
   Google Scholar
• Mour, S. I. (1977). Do teachers read? The Reading Teacher, 30, 397–401.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Google Scholar
• Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Verbal protocols of reading. In N. Duke & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 308–321). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. J. (1998). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. C. (2015). What does it mean to read literary works? The literacy practices, epistemologies, and instructional approaches of literary scholars and high school English language arts teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. C. Maher, B. L. & Moje, E. B. (2020). Learning disciplinary literacy teaching: An examination of preservice teachers' literacy teaching in secondary subject area classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103123
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. C. (2017). Disciplinary literacy in English language arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of literary reading and reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 53–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.154
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T., & Rush, L. (2017). Experts and novices reading literature: An analysis of disciplinary literacy in English language arts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(3), 199–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1299820
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559–586. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003559
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, R. E. (1998). The rise and fall of English: Reconstructing English as a discipline. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, L. (2005). The “Rhetoric of literary criticism” revisited: Mistaken critics, complex contexts, and social justice. Written Communication, 22(1), 76–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088304272751
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. D., & Novak, B. (2011). Teaching literacy for love and wisdom: Being the book and being the change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (1991). Teachers as readers. Reading, 25(2), 30–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.1991.tb00030.x
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1984). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599
   Google Scholar
• Zancanella, D. (1991). Teachers reading/readers teaching: Five teachers’ personal approaches to literature and their teaching of literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(1), 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1
   Google Scholar