Literacy Clinics During COVID-19:
Voices that Envision the Future

References

• Bader, L. A., & Wiesendanger, K. D. (1986). University based reading clinics: Practices and procedures. The Reading Teacher, 39(7), 698–702. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20199193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2016). What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11–23). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, J., & Carter, M. (2019). Developmental reading assessment (3rd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, E., Laster, B., Ryan, T., Gurvitz, D., Cobb, J., & Vazzano, J. (2017). Video for teacher reflection: Reading clinics in action. In R. Brandenburg, K. Glasswell, M. Jones, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Reflective theories in teacher education practice - process, impact and enactment (pp. 141–160). Springer Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_8
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., Schonberg, E., & Northway, K. (2015). Student perceptions of intellectual engagement in the writing center: Cognitive challenge, tutor involvement, and productive sessions. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 39(7–8), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99–S107. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambria, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). Motivating and engaging students in reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2007). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Codling, R. M. (2013). Creating an optimal learning environment for struggling readers. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek (Eds.), Literacy research, practice and evaluation: Volume 2. Advanced literacy practices: From the clinic to the classroom (pp. 21–42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, D., Hubbard, D., Holbein, M., & Delacruz, S. (2013). Creating a university-based literacy center. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek (Eds.), Literacy research, practice and evaluation: Volume 2. Advanced literacy practices: From the clinic to the classroom (pp. 21–42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deeney, T., Dozier, C., Cavendish, L., Ferrara, P., Gallagher, T., Gurvitz, D., Hoch, M., Huggins, S., Laster, B., McAndrews, S., McCarty, R., Milby, T., Msengi, S., Rhodes, J., & Waller, R. (2019, December). Student and family perceptions of the literacy lab/reading clinic experience. Paper presented at the LRA Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Deeney, T., Dozier, C., Cavendish, L., Ferrara, P., Gallagher, T., Gurvitz, D., Hoch, M., Huggins, S., Laster, B., McAndrews, S., McCarty, R., Milby, T., Msengi, S., Rhodes, J., & Waller, R. (2020, December). Student perspectives of reading and participation in literacy labs/reading clinics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Literacy Research Association, Online.
   Google Scholar
• Deeney, T., Dozier, C., Smit, J., Davies, S., Laster, B., Applegate, M., Cobb, J., Gaunty-Porter, D., Gurvitz, D., McAndrews, S., Ryan, T., Eeg-Moreland, M., Sargent, S., Swanson, M., Dubert, L., Morewood, A., & Milby, T. (2011). Clinic experiences that promote transfer to school contexts: What matters in clinical teacher preparation. In P. J. Dunston & L. Gambrell (Eds.), 60th yearbook of the literacy research association (pp. 127–143). Literacy Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (19021990). The child and the curriculum. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, C., & Deeney, T. (2013). Keeping learners at the center of teaching. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheeks (Eds.), Literacy, research, practice, & evaluation: From clinic to classroom (pp. 367–386). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, C., Johnston, P., & Rogers, R. (2006). Critical literacy/critical teaching: Tools for preparing responsive teachers. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, S. V., & Sosnowski, C. (2019). Emerging theory of teacher resilience: A situational analysis. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2018-0118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubert, L. A., & Laster, B. (2011). Technology in practice: Educators trained in reading clinic/literacy labs. Journal of Reading Education, 36(2), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44 . https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, D. (1999). Introduction. In P. Mosenthal & D. Eversen (Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy (pp. ix–xii). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1(1), 120–160.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1994). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. International Reading Association (pp. 928–950).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed). Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Francom, G. M., Lee, S. J., & Pinkney, H. (2021). Technologies, challenges and needs of K-12 teachers in the transition to distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. TechTrends, 65(4), 589–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00625-5
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–477). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Heinemann Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106–1113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heflich, S. R., & Smith, W. E. (2012). Transitioning online: Moving a graduate reading program online while continuing to maintain program rigor and meet standards. In L. Martin, M. Boggs, S. Szabo, & T. Morrison (Eds.), Association of literacy educators and researchers yearbook: The joy of teaching literacy (Vol. 34, pp. 105–119). Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., Svrcek, N., Lammert, C., Daley-Lesch, A., Steinitz, E., Greeter, E., & DuJulio, S. (2019). A research review of literacy tutoring and mentoring in initial teacher preparation: Towards practices that can transform teaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19833292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruby, G. (2001). Sociological, postmodern, and new realism perspectives in social constructionism: Implications for literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006, March). Assessing technology integration: The RAT–replacement, amplification, and transformation-framework. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1616–1620). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanpur, M., & Kirmani, M. H. (2005). Diversity and technology: Classroom implications of the digital divide. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000402
   Google Scholar
• Kymes, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using think-alouds. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.48.6.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A. K. A. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laster, B. (1999). Welcoming family literacy at the front door. In P. Mosenthal & D. Eversen (Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy (pp. 325–346). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laster, B. (2013). A historical view of student learning and teacher development in reading clinics. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheeks (Eds.), Literacy, research, practice, & evaluation: From clinic to classroom (pp. 3–20). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Laster, B., & Finkelstein, C. (2016). Professional learning for educators focused on reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed.), pp. 70–83). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Laster, B., Rhodes, J., & Wilson, J. (2018, April). Literacy teachers using ipads in clinical settings. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 544–550). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 22, 2021, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182579
   Google Scholar
• Laster, B., Rogers, R., Gallagher, T., Scott, D. B., Vasinda, S., Orellana, P., Rhodes, J., Waller, R., Deeney, T., Hoch, M., Cavendish, L., Milby, T., Butler, M., Johnson, T., Msengi, S., Dozier, C., Huggins, S., & Gurvitz, D. (2021, December). Contrapuntal voices from literacy clinics during COVID-19: What do we harvest for the future? Literacy Research Association Conference, Atlanta, GA., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Laster, B., Tysseling, L., Stinnett, M., Wilson, J., Cherner, T., Curwen, M., Ryan, T., & Huggins, S. (2016). Effective use of tablets (iPads) for multimodal literacy learning: What we learn from reading clinics/literacy labs. The App Teacher. https://appedreview.com/effective-use-tablets-ipads-multimodal-literacy-learning-learn-reading-clinicsliteracy-labs/
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to“ be there” for distance learners (Vol. 18). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. S. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory (6th) ed.). Pearson North America.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebfreund, M. D. (2021). Cognitive and motivational predictors of narrative and informational text comprehension. Reading Psychology, 42(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienthal, L. K. (2014). Moving the university reading clinic online. In S. Szabo, L. Haas, & S. Vasinda (Eds.), Exploring the world of literacy: Thirty-sixth yearbook (pp. 179–193). Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, J., Clemons, C., Thoron, A., & Lindner, N. (2020). Remote instruction and distance education: A response to COVID-19. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 1(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v1i2.39
   Google Scholar
• Lohnes-Watulak, S., & Laster, B. P. (2016, December). Take 2: A second look at technology stalled: Exploring the new digital divide in one urban school. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 12(2), 1–2. http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/take-2/
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Schatschneider, C. (2018). Examining the simple view of reading with elementary school children: Still simple after all these years. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518764833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 24–40). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, G. R. (2017). Highlighting the importance of context in the TPACK model: Three cases of non-traditional settings. Issues and Trends in Learning Technologies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v5i1_mackinnon
   Google Scholar
• Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2013). Meet them where they are: Engaging instruction for struggling readers. In Ortlieb, E. and Cheek, E.H. (Ed.), School-based interventions for struggling readers, K-8 (pp. 41–60). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-0458(2013)0000003006
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msengi, S., & Laster, B. (2022). Pivots during Covid-19: Teachers, students, parents, and supervisors in the circle of literacy clinics. In V. Shinas (Ed.), Cases on practical applications for remote, hybrid, and hyflex teaching (pp. 244-265). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Education. (2020). COVID-19 educational inequities roundtable series, summary report. National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/covid-19-educational-inequities-roundtable-series-summary-report/
   Google Scholar
• Onyema, E. M., Nwafor, C., Obafemi, F., Shuvro, S., Fyneface, G. A., Sharma, A., & Alhuseen, O. A. (2020). Impact of coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13). https://www.iiste.org 2222-288X.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., & McDowell, F. D. (2016). Looking closer at reading comprehension: Examining the use of effective practices in a literacy clinic. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 15(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2015-0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Sargent, S., & Moreland, M. (2014). Evaluating the efficacy of using a digital reading environment to improve reading comprehension within a reading clinic. Reading Psychology, 35(5), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.683236
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pletcher, B., Robertson, P., & Sullivan, M. (2019). A current overview of 10 university-based reading clinics. Reading Horizons, 58(3), 1–22. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol58/iss3/2
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, S. M. (2020). Flux pedagogy: Transforming teaching and leading during coronavirus. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 17(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. (2013). Innovative practices in the reading clinic: Helping “Digital Natives” incorporate 21st century technologies. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheeks (Eds.), Literacy, research, practice, & evaluation: From clinic to classroom (pp. 283–302). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Secoy, M., & Sigler, H. W. (2019). Discovering digital differentiation: A teacher reimagines writing workshop in the digital age. Voices from the Middle, 26(4), 21–27. http://proxybl.lib.montana.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/discovering-digital-differentiation-teacher/docview/2279756606/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital living in the age of Covid19: Unsettling what we see as possible. Postdigital in Science and Education, 2(3), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00166-9
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Skar, G. B. U., Graham, S., & Huebner, A. (2021). Learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of emergency remote instruction on first grade students’ writing: A natural experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000701
   Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz, L. (2020). Internet access as a new human right? State of the art on the threshold of 2020. Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, 8, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2018.8.03
   Google Scholar
• Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tysseling, L., & Laster, B. (2013). Taking technology from clinic to classroom. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek (Eds.), Literacy, research, practice, & evaluation: From clinic to classroom (pp. 245–264). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• U.N. (2016, June 27). General assembly, the promotion, protection, and enjoyment of human rights on the internet. A/HRC/32/L.20. https://www.article19.org/data/files/Internet_Statement_Adopted.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vasinda, S., Adams, H., James, K., Henry, A., Henson, T., McKinney, B., Mueller, E., Randolph, M., & Taylor, J. (2020). Preservice teachers use design-based research: Learning to tutor online during COVID19. In R. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Heartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, technology, & teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 367–372). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903
   Google Scholar
• Vasinda, S., Kander, F., & Redmond-Sanogo, A. (2015). University reading and mathematics clinics in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges of iPad integration. In M. Niess & G. Gillow-Wiles (Eds.), The handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp. 135–163). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Vokatis, B. (2017). How to establish an online reading clinic with quality supervision: A perspective on course design, technologies, and mentorship. Literacy Practice & Research, 42(2), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Vokatis, B. (2018). Reflections from the first phase of teaching online literacy clinics: Changes to the initial perspectives and future considerations. Literacy Practice & Research, 25(1), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar