The effect of short vowelization on curriculum-based measurement of reading fluency and comprehension in Arabic

REFERENCES

• Abbott, M., Walton, C., & Greenwood, C. (2002). Phonemic awareness in kindergarten and first grade. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Hamour, B. (in press). A pilot study for standardizing curriculum based measurement oral reading fluency in Arabic. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Hamour, B. (2013). The use of Arabic CBM Maze among three levels of achievers in Jordan. International Journal of Special Education, 28(3),149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). The role of vowels and context in the reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 629–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing, 9, 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type, and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 14, 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2002). Reading, syntactic, orthographic, and working memory skills of bilingual Arabic-English speaking Canadian children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 661–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIMSweb. (2008). Curriculum based measurement norms [Date file]. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mannai, H. A., & Everatt, J. (2005). Phonological processing skills as predictors of literacy amongst Arabic speaking Bahraini children. Dyslexia, 11, 269–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). 2001 Census of population and housing. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Barger, J. (2003). Comparing the DIBELS oral reading fluency indicator and the North Carolina end of grade reading assessment(technical report). Ashville: North Carolina Teacher Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (2004). Introduction on regular and impaired reading in Semitic languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdiscplinary Journal, 17, 645–650.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, G.J. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W.L.Loner & J.W.Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R., Davis, L., & Maya, C. (2003). Sources of variance in curriculum-based measures of silent reading. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida comprehensive assessment test(Tech. Rep. No. 1). Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research. Retrieved from http://www.fcrr.org/technicalreports/TechnicalReport1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M. (2007). The nature and causes of dyslexia in different languages. In M.Snowling & C.Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 335–336). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: The standard error of measurement. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R., & Cuentos, F. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In N.Brunswick, S.McDougall, & P.de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S., Mirkin, P., & Wesson, C. (1984). How to write effective data-based IEPs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16, 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbeheri, G., Everatt, J., Mahfoudhi, A., Abu Al-Diyar, M., & Taibah, N. (2011). Orthographic processing and reading comprehension among Arabic speaking mainstream and LD children. Dyslexia, 17(2), 123–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L. (1993). Performance in reading from content area text as an indicator of achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fore, C., Boon, R., & Martin, C. (2007). Concurrent and predictive criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measurement for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. International Journal of Special Education, 22, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fore, C., Burke, M., & Martin, C. (2006). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving model: An emerging alternative to traditional assessment for African American children and youth. Journal of Negro Education, 75, 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Class wide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, G., & Tindal, G. (1985). An application of curriculum based assessment: The use of direct and repeated measurement. Exceptional Children, 52, 244–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades(Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. J., Van Der Heyden, A. M., Skokut, M., & Lilles, E. (2009). Progress monitoring in oral reading fluency within the context of RTI. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(1), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., & Mendez-Barletta, L. M. (2008). Considerations when assessing ELLs for special education. In J. K.Klingner, J. J.Hoover, & L.Baca (Eds.), Why do English language learners struggle with reading (pp. 93–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B., Mirkin, P. K., & Deno, S. L. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. The Journal of Special Education, 18(2), 109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura wayman, M., Wallace, T., Ives-Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2009). NAEP 2009 reading report card for the nation and the states. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI: A closer look at response to intervention. Retrieved from http://www.cldinternational.org/Articles/rtiessentialcomponents.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction(NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Paizi, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In N.Brunswick, S.McDougall, & P.de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children's ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., & Marston, D. (1990). Classroom-based assessment: Evaluating instruction outcomes. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., & Mathes, P. G. (2000). A basic guide to understanding, assessing, and teaching phonological awareness. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Meer, C. D., Lentz, F. E., & Stollar, S. (2005). The relationship between oral reading fluency and Ohio proficiency testing in reading(Technical Report). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar