Comparing the performance of older low-progress readers on the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension with performance on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and other measures of reading and related skills

References

• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). Reading. Retrieved May 11, 2016, from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/reading/reading.html
   Google Scholar
• Colenbrander, D., Nickels, L., & Kohnen, S. (2016, April 26). Similar but different: Differences in comprehension diagnosis on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 1–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12075
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A., Croft, C., & Reid, N. (1981). Burt word reading test: New Zealand revision. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Lervag, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The foundations of literacy development in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26, 1877–1886. doi:10.1177/0956797615603702
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. (2011). York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension (YARC). Educational Psychology in Practice, 27, 437–439. doi:10.1080/02667363.2011.629456
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Pratt, C. (2001). Martin and Pratt nonword reading test. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. D. (1958). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. D. (1988). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability – Revised (2nd ed.). Hawthorn: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. D. (1999). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Duff, F., Petrou, A., & Schiffeldrin, J. (2011). Identification of children at risk of dyslexia: The validity of teacher judgements using ‘Phonic Phases’. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 157–170. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01492.x
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., … Hulme, C. (2012). York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension: Passage reading (Australian ed.). London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard, S. E., Hulme, C., Clarke, P., Barmby, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension: Passage reading, secondary test (Australian ed.). London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard, S., Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2011). The rate and identification of reading difficulties in secondary school pupils in England. Retrieved from the GL Assessment, http://www.yarcsupport.co.uk/documents/DrSueStothard_ReadingdifficultiesatSecondaryLevel_June2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, P. (2005). Spelling: Approaches to teaching and assessment (2nd ed.). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2000). An evaluation of MULTILIT: ‘Making Up Lost Time In Literacy’. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2006). The development of a passage reading test for the frequent monitoring of performance of low-progress readers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 30, 72–85. doi:10.1080/10300110609409366
   Google Scholar
• Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2013). The Wheldall assessment of reading passages (WARP) manual. Sydney: MultiLit Pty.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A., Mitchell, S., O’Donoghue, A., Cowhey, S., & Kearney, M. (2015). Making sense of it: A brief programme to improve reading comprehension in adolescents with language impairments in main stream school. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50, 776–787. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12170
   Google Scholar