Experiences, attitudes and trust: an inquiry into elite athletes’ perception of the whereabouts reporting system

References

• ADD, 2010. Årsberetning 2010 [online]. Brøndby, Anti-Doping Danmark. Available from:http://www.antidoping.dk/da/Servicemenu/DownloadCenter/Publikationer/Aarsberetning_2010.aspx [Accessed 10 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• ADD, 2011. Whereaboutprogrammet [online]. Available from:http://www.antidoping.dk/da/Aktuelt/2011/11/Whereaboutsprogrammet.aspx [Accessed 10 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Alaranta, A., et al., 2006. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. International journal of sports medicine, 27 (10), 842–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodworth, A. and McNamee, M., 2010. Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes. International journal of drug policy, 21, 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, J. and Thomas, G.M., 1997. World culture in the world polity: a century of international non-governmental organizations. American sociological review, 62, 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik, B., Hanstad, D.V., and Loland, S., 2009. Attitudes towards use of performance-enhancing substances and body modification techniques. A comparison between elite athletes and the general population. Sport in society, 12 (6), 737–754.
   Google Scholar
• Brissonneau, C. and Ohl, F., 2010. The genesis and effect of French anti-doping policies in cycling. International journal of sport policy and politics, 2 (2), 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.L., 2010. Institutional reproduction and change. In: G. Morgan, J.L., et al., eds. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, A.V., 2009. At tjene og beskytte den rene atlet [To serve and protect the clean athlete]. In: A.V. Christiansen, ed. Kontrolsport – Big Brother blandt atleter og tilskuere. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, A.V. and Møller, V., 2007. Mål, medicin og moral – om eliteatleters opfattelse af sport, doping og fairplay [Ambition, medicine and moral (ethics): on elite athletes’ perception of sport, doping and fair play]. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dikic, N., Markovic, S.S., and McNamee, M., 2011. On the efficacy of WADA’s whereabouts policy: between filing failures and missed tests. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin Jahrgang 62, Nr. 10.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W., 1991. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dimeo, P., 2007. Beyond good and evil: a history of drug use in sport 1876–1976. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., et al., 2010. Drug testing in sport: the attitudes and experiences of elite athletes. International journal of drug policy, 21, 330–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, A.M. and Overbye, M., forthcoming. Urine doping controls: the athletes’ perspective. International journal of sport policy and politics.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 1978. What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EU, 2010. The implementation of the WADA Code in the European Union [online]. Available from: http://www.dopinglijn.be/fileadmin/media/Asserstudie/rapportAsserstudie_EN.pdf [Accessed 18 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2002. Årvågning og straf [Original title: Surveiller et punir, 1975]. København: Det Lille Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gucciardi, D.F., Jalleh, G., and Donovan, R.J., 2010. Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes? Psychology of sport and exercise, 11, 479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucciardi, D.F., Jalleh, G., and Donovan, R.J., 2011. An examination of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 14 (6), 469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. 2006. Utøverundersøkelse meldeplikt 2006. Publisert fra 11.10.2006 til 13.11.2006. Unpublished data report.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. 2008. Drug scandal and organizational change with the International Ski Federation: a figurational approach. European sport management quarterly, 8, 379–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. 2009. Anti-doping in sport. A study of policy development since 1998. Dissertation. Norwegian School of Sport Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. and Loland, S., 2007. Meldeplikt for toppidrettsutøvere: forsvarlig antidopingarbeid eller uforsvarlig overvåkning? Nytt norsk tidsskrift, 3, 314–322.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. and Loland, S., 2009. Elite athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance system? European journal of sport science, 9 (1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V., Skille, E.Å., and Loland, S., 2010. Harmonization of anti-doping work: myth or reality? Sport in society, 13, 418–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V., Skille, E.A., and Thurston, M., 2009. Elite athletes’ perspectives on providing whereabouts information: a survey of athletes in the Norwegian registered testing pool. Sport und gesellschaft – sport and society, 6 (1), 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V., Smith, A., and Waddington, I., 2008. The establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency: a study of organizational change and unplanned outcomes. International review for the sociology of sport, 43 (3), 227–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, M., et al., 2010. I wish I was twenty-one now – beyond doping in the Australian peloton. Report. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2002. Dying to win: doping in sport and the development of anti-doping policy. 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huybers, T. and Mazanov, J., 2012. What would Kim do: a choice study of projected athlete doping considerations. Journal of sport management, 26, 322–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R., 1991. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, B. and Broers, B., 2012. The Olympics and harm reduction? Harm reduction journal, 9, 33. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-9-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, B., Mauron, A., and Miah, A., 2007. Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal. BMC medical ethics, 8, 2. doi:10.1186/1472-6939/8/2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellmann, M., 2002. Enhancing recovery: preventing underperformance in athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, L., 2011. Elite sportspersons and commodity control: anti-doping as quality assurance. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (2), 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lippi, G., et al., 2008. New strategies for doping control. Journal of sports sciences, 26 (5), 441–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P.O., 2007. Klüft touts computer chip implants [online]. Available from: http://www.thelocal.se/9454/20071219/ [Accessed 19 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Mazanov, J. and Huybers, T., 2010. An empirical model of athlete decisions to use performance-enhancing drugs: qualitative evidence. Qualitative research in sport and exercise, 2 (3), 385–402.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1991 [1977]. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press, 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mignon, P., 2003. The Tour de France and the doping issue. In: H. Dauncey and G. Hare, eds. The Tour de France 1903–2003. London: Cass, 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, V., 2009a. Whereabouts – en demoraliserende regel [Whereabouts – a demoralizing rule]. In: A.V. Christiansen, ed. Kontrolsport – Big Brother blandt atleter og tilskuere. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, V., 2009b. Løgn over løgn. Om Michael Rasmussens Tour de France-exit [Lie upon Lie. On the expulsion of Michal Rasmussen from the Tour de France]. Copenhagen: People’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, V., 2011a. One step too far – about WADA’s whereabouts rule. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (2), 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, V., 2011b. The Scapegoat. About the expulsion of Michal Rasmussen from the Tour de France 2007 and beyond. Copenhagen: People’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16 (1), 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, W., Taylor, S., and Wingate, A., 2011. Adverse analyzing. A European study of anti-doping organization reporting practices and the efficacy of drug testing athletes. Available from: http://www.euathletes.org/uploads/media/Adverse_Analyzing__FINAL_.pdf [Accessed 16 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Petróczi, A. and Haugen, K., 2012. The doping self-reporting game: the paradox of a ‘false-telling’ mechanism and its potential research and policy implications. Sport management review, 15, 513–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petróczi, A. and Naughton, D.P., 2011. Impact of multidisciplinary research on advancing anti-doping efforts. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (2), 231–254.
   Google Scholar
• Pitsch, W. and Emrich, E., 2012. The frequency of doping in elite sport: results of a replication study. International review for the sociology of sport, 47, 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sas-Nowosielski, K. and Swiatkowska, L., 2007. The knowledge of the world anti-doping code among Polish athletes and their attitudes toward doping and anti-doping. Human movement, 8 (1), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, C.A. and Ritter, D., 2009. Debutantens dagbog. Fortællinger fra verdens største cykelløb [A diary of a debutant. Stories from the world’s biggest bike race]. København: People’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, B. and Lestrelin, L., 2011. The Puerto affair: revealing the difficulties of the fight against doping. Journal of sport & social issues, 35 (2), 186–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamm, H., et al., 2008. The public perception of doping in sport in Switzerland, 1995–2004. Journal of sports sciences, 26 (3), 235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. and Smith, A.C.T., 2008. Drug use in sport: implications for public policy. Journal of sport & social issues, 32 (3), 278–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelan, P. and Boeckmann, R.J., 2006. Why drug testing in elite sport does not work: perceptual deterrence theory and the role of personal moral beliefs. Journal of applied social psychology, 36 (12), 2909–2934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striegel, H., Vollkommer, G., and Dickhuth, H.H., 2002. Combating drug use in competitive sport. An analysis from the athletes’ perspective. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 42 (3), 354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKAD, 2007. British athletes back whereabouts system, 28 Mar 2007 [online]. Available from:http://www.ukad.org.uk/news/article/british_athletes_back_whereabouts_system [Accessed 19 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2003. World Anti-Doping Code 2003. Montreal, QC: World Anti-Doping Agency.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2008. 2003 World Anti-Doping Code official report as of 31 December 2008 [online]. Available from: http://www.wakoweb.com/Pdf/2384.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2009. World Anti-Doping Code 2009. Montreal, QC: World Anti-Doping Agency.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2011. Compliance report 20 November 2011 [online]. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/The-Code/Code-Compliance--Reporting/Compliance-Report---Nov---2011/ [Accessed 17 April 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, I., 2010. Surveillance and control in sport: a sociologist looks at the WADA whereabouts system. International journal of sport policy and politics, 2 (3), 255–274.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, I., et al., 2005. Drug use in English professional football. British journal of sports medicine, 39, e18. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.012468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, U., 2009. The World Anti-Doping Agency: constructing a hybrid organization in permanent stress (dis-) order? International journal of sport policy, 1 (2), 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, U., 2010. The International Cycling Union under Siege – anti-doping and the biological passport as a mission impossible? European sport management quarterly, 10 (3), 321–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, U., 2011. Towards the construction of the World Anti-Doping Agency: analyzing the approaches of FIFA and the IAAF to doping in sport. European sport management quarterly, 11 (5), 449–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, U. and Hanstad, D.V., 2011. Scandinavian perspectives on doping: a comparative policy analysis in relation to the international process of institutionalizing anti-doping. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (3), 355–372.
   Google Scholar