Good governance in international sport organizations: an analysis of the 35 Olympic sport governing bodies

References

• Andreff, W., 2000. Financing modern sport in the face of a sporting ethic. European journal for sport management, 7, 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Andreff, W., 2008. Globalisation of the sports economy. Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello sport, 4 (3), 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaut, J. 2006. Independent European Sport Review 2006 [online]. Available from: http://media2.pixelpoint.at/ppm_3dak_publicsport/~M0/241.3dak.pdf [Accessed 22 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American institute of planners, 35 (4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. and Heintzman, R., 2000. The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. International review of administrative sciences, 66 (1), 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonollo De Zwart, F. and Gilligan, G., 2009. Sustainable governance in sporting organisations. In: P. Rodriguez, S. Késenne, and H. Dietl, eds. Social responsibility and sustainability in sports. Oviedo: Universitat de Oviedo, 165–227.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., Pamuk, Y., and Stahn, A. 2008. Good governance in the European Union. In: Berlin working paper on European integration No. 7. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., 2007. Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European law journal, 13 (4), 447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D., Brown, D., and Anastasopoulos, V., 2002. Women on boards: not just the right thing... but the “bright” thing. Ottawa: The conference board of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L.D. and Caylor, M.L., 2009. Corporate governance and firm operating performance. Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 32 (February), 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyninckx, H., 2012. Sports governance: between the obsession with rules and regulation and the aversion to being ruled and regulated. In: B. Segaert, et al., eds. Sports governance, development and corporate responsibility. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casini, L. 2009. Globally hybrid public-private bodies: the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). In: Draft paper for the Global Administrative Law Conference on ‘Practical Legal Problems of International Organisations’, 20–21 March 2009, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Chaker, A.-N., 2004. Good governance in sport – A European survey. Strasbourgh: Council of Europe publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.L., 2010. L’autonomie du sport en Europe. Strasbourg: Publications du Conseil de l’Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.L., 2012. From daily management to high politics: the governance of the International Olympic Committee. In: L. Robinson, et al., eds. Routledge handbook of sport management. New York: Routledge, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L.R. and Spitzer, M., 1992. Term limits. Georgetown law review, 80 (3), 477–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci, M. and Geeraert, A., 2012. The ‘social dialogue’ in European professional football. Comparative labor law and policy journal, 33 (1), 203–234.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, 2012. Good governance and ethics in sport. Parliamentary assembly committee on Culture, Science Education and Media. Strasbourgh: Council of Europe publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Croci, O. and Forster, J., 2004. Webs of authority: hierarchies, networks, legitimacy, and economic power in global sport organisations. In: G.T. Papanikos, ed. The economics and management of mega athletic events: Olympic Games, professional sports, and other essays. Athens: Athens Institute for Education and Research, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R.J., 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, R.T., 2008. Beyond the box score: a look at collective bargaining agreements in professional sports and their effect on competition. Journal of dispute resolution, 267, 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. and Clough, R., 2005. Corporate governance and performance: an exploration of the connection in a public sector context. Canberra: University of Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Elchardus, M. and Smits, W., 2002. Anatomie en oorzaak van het wantrouwen. Brussels: VUB press.
   Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., 2009. A governance-structure approach to voluntary organisations. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 38 (5), 761–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2001. European governance. A white paper, COM (2001) 428 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2007. White paper on sport, COM (2007) 391 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. Expert group ‘good governance’. Report from the 3rd meeting (5–6 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E.F., 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88 (2), 375–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondas, N. and Sassalos, S., 2000. A different voice in the boardroom: how the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global focus, 12 (2), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, J. and Pope, N., 2004. The political economy of global sporting organisations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• García, B., 2007. UEFA and the European Union: from confrontation to cooperation. Journal of contemporary European research, 3 (3), 202–223.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., 2013. Limits to the autonomy of sport: EU law. In: J. Alm, ed. Action for good governance in international sports organisations. Copenhagen: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 151–184.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., Scheerder, J., and Bruyninckx, H., 2013. The governance network of European football: introducing new governance approaches to steer football at the EU level. International journal of sport policy and politics, 5 (1), 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. and Keohane, R.O., 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in w politics. American political science review, 99 (1), 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, C., Shibli, S., and Coleman, R., 2005. Sport and economic regeneration in cities. Urban studies, 42 (5/6), 985–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgreen, L., 2004. European sports law: a comparative analysis of the European and American models of sport. Copenhagen: Forlage Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C., 2002. Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, O., 1995. Corporate governance: some theory and implications. The economic journal, 105 (430), 678–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, I. and Lee, P.C., 2004. Governance and ethics in sport. In: S. Chadwick and J. Beech, eds. The business of sport management. Harlow: Pearson Education, 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J., 2009. The European commission’s white paper on sport: a step backwards for specificity? International journal of sport policy and politics, 1 (3), 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P., 2000. Democracy and governance. In: J. Pierre, ed. Debating governance – authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2004. Civil rights, doping control and the world anti-doping code. Sport in society, 7, 420–437.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, M., 2005. Volleygate: a showcase of greed and mismanagement. Play the game magazine, 3, 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, R. and Cuskelly, G., 2007. Sport governance. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hyden, G., Court, J., and Mease, K., 2004. Making sense of governance. Empirical evidence from sixteen developing countries. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• IMF, 2007. Good governance: the IMF’s role. Washington: IMF publication services.
   Google Scholar
• Infantino, G.. 2006. Meca-Medina: a step backwards for the European Sports Model and the Specificity of Sport? [online]? Nyon: UEFA. Available from: http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefa/KeyTopics/480391_DOWNLOAD.pdf [Accessed 22 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• IOC, 2008. Basic universal principles of good governance of the Olympic and sports movement. Lausanne: IOC.
   Google Scholar
• IOC and FIFA, 2007. IOC-FIFA joint declaration – EU white paper on sport: much work remains to be done [online]. Available from: http://www.olympic.org/content/news/media-resources/manual-news/1999-2009/2007/07/11/ioc-fifa-joint-declaration---eu-white-paper-on-sport-much-work-remains-to-be-done/ [Accessed 29 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, A., 2006. Foul! The secret world of FIFA: bribes, vote-rigging and ticket scandals. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. The journal of financial economics, 3, 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., 2008. The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 26, 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katwala, S., 2000. Democratising global sport. London: The foreign policy centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A., 2007. Governance indicators: where are we, where should we be going? New York: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J., 2004. Managing uncertainties in networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. ed., 1993. Modern governance: new government-society interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. and Agrawal, A., 2006. Environmental governance. Annual review of environmental resources, 31, 297–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licht, A.N., Goldschmidt, C., and Schwartz, S.H., 2007. Culture rules: the foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of comparative economics, 35 (4), 659–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallon, B., 2000. The Olympic bribery scandal. The journal of Olympic history, 8 (2), 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1995. Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNabb, D.E., 2004. Research methods for political science. Quantitative and qualitative methods. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R., 2003. Holding power to account: accountability in modern democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, L.M. 1994. An empirical examination of direct democracy. Thesis (PhD). George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2004. Principles of corporate governance 2004. Paris: OECD publications.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, R. and McArdle, D., 2004. Beyond Bosman: the European Union’s influence upon professional athletes’ freedom of movement. Sport in society, 7 (3), 403–418.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, A.. 2011. What should be in a ‘good governance code for European team sport federations? Unpublished thesis. Executive Master in European Sport Governance (Mesgo).
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R., 2013. How can FIFA be held accountable? Sport management review [online]. Available from http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/2013.01.pdf [Accessed 28 July 2013].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieth, M., 2011. Governing FIFA, concept paper and report. Basel: Universität Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Play the Game, 2011. Cologne consensus: towards a global code for governance in sport. In: End statement of the conference, Play the Game 2011 conference, 6 October 2011, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. Stokes, S.C., and Manin, B. eds, 1999. Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., 1996. The new governance: governing without governance. Political studies, 44 (4), 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., 1997. Understanding governance. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J., 1992. Governance, order and change in world politics. In: J. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel, eds. Governance without government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, C., 2001. International co-operation for democracy and good governance: moving towards a second generation? European journal of development research, 13 (1), 154–180.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M., 2005. Governance and the transformation of political representation. In: J. Newman, ed. Remaking governance: peoples, politics and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: Policy Press, 179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W., 1994. Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of theoretical politics, 6, 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, S., 2011. Safe hands: building integrity and transparency at FIFA. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G., 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of management studies, 48 (4), 899–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sealy, R. and Singh, V. 2006. Role models, work identity, and senior women’s career progression – Why are role models important? In: K.M. Weaver, ed. Best papers proceedings of academy of management annual meeting, 11–16 August 2006, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W., 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52 (2), 737–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, M. and Sturm, D.M.M., 2004. Term limits and electoral accountability. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public administration, 87 (2), 234–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanhove, J. and Verhoest, K., 2007. Analyse van government governance op verschillende niveaus: ontwikkeling van een normatief en analytisch raamwerk gebaseerd op principes, processen, instrumenten en cycli. Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Overheidsmanagement (VTOM), 12 (4), 56–71.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J.E., 2003. Democratizing the international monetary fund and the World Bank: governance and accountability. Governance and accountability, 16 (1), 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., 1998. Governance as theory: five propositions. International social science journal, 50 (1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K., 2000. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European journal of political research, 37 (3), 261–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, J., 2002. Network football. In: J. Sugden and A. Tomlinson, eds. Power games. London: Routledge, 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, J. and Tomlinson, A., 1998. FIFA and the contest for world football: who rules the peoples’ game? Cambridge: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, S. 2006. A theory on the evolution of modern sport. International association of sports economists working paper series, Paper No. 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. and O’Sullivan, N., 2009. How should national governing bodies of sport be governed in the UK? An exploratory study of board structure. Corporate governance: an international review, 17 (6), 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., and Singh, V., 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corporate governance: an international review, 17 (3), 320–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, L., Kihl, L., and Babiak, K., 2010. Democratisation and governance in international sport: addressing issues with athlete involvement in organisational policy. International journal of sport policy and politics, 2 (3), 275–302.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.A. and Moncrief, G.F., 1993. The implications of term limits for women and minorities: some evidence from the states. Social science quarterly, 74 (2), 300–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, A., 1983. Tuck up tight lads: structures of control within football culture. In: A. Tomlinson, ed. Explorations in football culture. Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association Publications, 165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, A., 2000. FIFA and the men who made it. Soccer & society, 1 (1), 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP, 1997. Governance for sustainable human development. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, J., 1999. Verantwoorden of vertrekken: Een essay over politieke verantwoordelijkheid. s-Gravenhage: VNG uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kersbergen, K. and Van Waarden, F., 2004. ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines. European journal of political research, 43 (2), 143–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, T., 2000. Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third world quarterly, 21 (5), 795–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K., 2008. Emerging patterns of global governance: the new interplay between the state, business and civil society. In: A. Scherer and G. Palazzo, eds. Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, N., 1999. Good governance in international organisations. Global governance, 5 (1), 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2003. Toolkit: developing corporate governance codes of best practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, N., 2004. A handbook on good NGO governance. Budapest: The Central and Working Group Eastern European on Nonprofit Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O., 1992. The effectiveness of international institutions: hard cases and critical variables. In: J. Rosenau and E.-O. Cziempel, eds. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 160–194.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O., 1994. International governance: protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I., 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelechowski, D. and Bilimoria, D., 2004. Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate governance: an international review, 12 (3), 337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar