1,142
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Get ready to innovate! Staff’s disposition to implement service innovation in non-profit sport organisations

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 579-595 | Received 16 Nov 2016, Accepted 15 Mar 2017, Published online: 10 Apr 2017

References

  • Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., and Shilbury, D., 2014. Corporate social responsibility in team sport organizations: toward a theory of decision-making. European sport management quarterly, 14 (3), 259–281. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.897736.
  • Anagnostopoulos, C., Winand, M., and Papadimitriou, D., 2016. Passion in the workplace: empirical insights from team sport organisations. European sport management quarterly, 16 (4), 385–412. doi:10.1080/16184742.2016.1178794.
  • Barett, F., Thomas, G., and Hocevar, S., 1995. The central role of discourse in large-scale change: a social construction perspective. Journal of applied behavioral science, 31 (3), 352–372. doi:10.1177/0021886395313007.
  • Bayle, E., 2005. Management des organisations sportives. Contributions à l’analyse du management des organisations hybrides [management of sport organisations. Contribution to the analysis of the management of hybrid organisations], Mémoire d’habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Block, J., Sandner, P., and Spiegel, F., 2015. How do risk attitudes differ within the group of entrepreneurs? The role of motivation and procedural utility. Journal of small business management, 53 (1), 183–206. doi:10.1111/jsbm.2015.53.issue-1.
  • Bollen, K.A. and Stine, R.A., 1992. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological methods and research, 21 (2), 205–229. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004.
  • Bowerman, B.L. and O’Connell, R.T., 1990. Linear statistical models: an applied approach. 2nd. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
  • Brockhaus, R.H., 1980. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of management journal, 23 (3), 509–520. doi:10.2307/255515.
  • Camisón-Zornoza, C., et al., 2004. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25 (3), 331–361. doi:10.1177/0170840604040039.
  • Caza, A., 2000. Context receptivity: innovation in an amateur sport organization. Journal of sport management, 14 (3), 227–242. doi:10.1123/jsm.14.3.227.
  • Choi, M., 2011. Employees’ attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human resource management, 50 (4), 479–500. doi:10.1002/hrm.v50.4.
  • Cortina, J.M., 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78 (1), 98–104. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.
  • Crossan, M.M. and Apaydin, M., 2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47 (6), 1154–1191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.
  • Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555–590. doi:10.2307/256406.
  • Damanpour, F., 1996. Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics. Journal of high technology innovation management, 7 (2), 149–173. doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(96)90002-4.
  • Damanpour, F. and Aravind, D., 2012. Organizational structure and innovation revisited: from organic to ambidextrous structure. In: M. Mumford, ed. Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Elsevier, 479–509.
  • Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M., 2006. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization, and top managers. British journal of management, 17 (3), 215–236. doi:10.1111/bjom.2006.17.issue-3.
  • Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M., 2009. Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19 (3), 495–522. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun021.
  • DeLeon, P. and DeLeon, L., 2002. What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of public administration research and theory: J-PART, 467–492. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003544.
  • Dess, G.G. and Picken, J.C., 2000. Changing roles: leadership in the 21st century. Organizational dynamics, 28 (3), 18–34. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8.
  • Enjolras, B., 2002. The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 31 (3), 352–376. doi:10.1177/0899764002313003.
  • Ewalt, J.A.G. and Jennings, E.T., 2004. Administration, governance, and policy tools in welfare policy implementation. Public administration review, 64 (4), 449–462. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00391.x.
  • Ford, J.D., Ford, L.W., and D’Amelio, A., 2008. Resistance to change: the rest of the story. Academy of management review, 33 (2), 362–377. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.31193235.
  • Frambach, R.T. and Schillewaer, N., 2002. Organizational innovation adoption. A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55 (2), 163–176. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1.
  • Fuglsang, L. and Sundbo, J., 2005. The organizational innovation system: three modes. Journal of change management, 5 (3), 329–344. doi:10.1080/14697010500258056.
  • Girginov, V. and Sandanski, I., 2008. Understanding the changing nature of sports organisations in transforming societies. Sport management review, 11 (1), 21–50. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(08)70102-5.
  • Goggin, M.L., et al., 1990. Implementation theory and practice: toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Gopalakrishnan, S. and Damanpour, F., 2000. The impact of organizational context on innovation adoption in commercial banks. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 47 (1), 14–25. doi:10.1109/17.820722.
  • Green, S.E., 2004. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of management review, 29 (4), 653–669.
  • Greenhalgh, T., et al., 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82 (4), 581–629. doi:10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4.
  • Grima, F. and Trépo, G., 2003. Initier une innovation organisationnelle: tactiques d’influence et processus de persuasion mis en œuvre par les champions [Initiating an organisational innovation: influential tactics and persuasive processes implemented by champions]. Revue de gestion des ressources humaines, 50, 23–36.
  • Hage, J.T., 1999. Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual review of sociology, 25, 597–622. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.597.
  • Hansen, S.O. and Wakonen, J., 1997. Innovation, a winning solution? International journal of technology management, 13 (4), 345–358. doi:10.1504/IJTM.1997.001668.
  • Hayes, A.F., 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Hoeber, L., et al., 2015. The nature of innovation in community sport organizations. European sport management Quarterly, 15 (5), 518–534. doi:10.1080/16184742.2015.1085070.
  • Hoeber, L. and Hoeber, O., 2012. Determinants of an innovation process: a case study of technological innovation in a community sport organization. Journal of sport management, 26 (3), 213–223. doi:10.1123/jsm.26.3.213.
  • Hoffman, R.C. and Hegarty, H.W., 1993. Top management influence on innovations: effects of executive characteristics and social culture. Journal of management, 19 (3), 549–574. doi:10.1177/014920639301900303.
  • Hull, C.E. and Lio, B.H., 2006. Innovation in non-profit and for-profit organizations: visionary, strategic, and financial considerations. Journal of change management, 6 (1), 53–65. doi:10.1080/14697010500523418.
  • Jaskyte, K., 2013. Does size really matter? Organizational size and innovations in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24 (2), 229–247. doi:10.1002/nml.v24.2.
  • Jaskyte, K. and Dressler, W.W., 2005. Organizational culture and innovation in nonprofit human service organizations. Administration in social work, 29 (2), 23–41. doi:10.1300/J147v29n02_03.
  • Jolliffe, I., 2002. Principal component analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
  • Kan, K. and Tsai, W.D., 2006. Entrepreneurship and risk aversion. Small business economics, 26 (5), 465–474. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-5603-7.
  • Kikulis, L.M., Slack, T., and Hinings, B., 1992. Institutionally specific design archetypes: a framework for understanding change in national sport organizations. International review for the sociology of sport, 27 (4), 343–368. doi:10.1177/101269029202700405.
  • Lee, R.P., Ginn, G.O., and Naylor, G., 2009. The impact of network and environmental factors on service innovativeness. Journal of services marketing, 23 (6), 397–406. doi:10.1108/08876040910988183.
  • Lewin, K., 1997. Frontiers in group dynamics. In: G.W. Lewin, ed. Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, (Reprinted from Human Relations, 1, 5-41, 1947), 301–336.
  • Lipsky, M., 1980. Street level bureaucrats. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Masters, R. and Meier, R., 1988. Sex differences and risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Journal of small business management, 26 (1), 31–35.
  • May, T., Harris, S., and Collins, M., 2013. Implementing community sport policy: understanding the variety of voluntary club types and their attitudes to policy. International journal of sport policy and politics, 5 (3), 397–419. doi:10.1080/19406940.2012.735688.
  • McDonald, R.E., 2007. An investigation of innovation in non-profit organizations: the role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 36 (2), 256–281. doi:10.1177/0899764006295996.
  • Menard, S., 1995. Applied logistic regression analysis: quantitative applications in the social sciences. London: Sage Publications.
  • Mirvis, P.H., Sales, A.L., and Hackett, E.J., 1991. The implementation and adoption of new technology in organizations: the impact on work, people, and culture. Human resource management, 30 (1), 113–139. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X.
  • Mohr, L.B., 1969. Determinants of innovation in organizations. The American political science review, 63, (1),111-126. doi:10.1017/S0003055400261510.
  • Musteen, M., Barker, V.L., and Baeten, V.L., 2010. The influence of CEO tenure and attitude toward change on organizational approaches to innovation. The journal of applied behavioral science, 46 (3), 360–387.
  • Newell, S. and Swan, J., 1995. The diffusion of innovations in sport organizations: an evaluative framework”. Journal of sport management, 9 (3), 317–333. doi:10.1123/jsm.9.3.317.
  • Perri, G., 1993. Innovation by nonprofit organizations: policy and research issues. Nonprofit management and leadership, 3 (4), 397–414. doi:10.1002/nml.4130030406.
  • Pieron, M. and De Knop, P., 2000. Gestion et organisation du sport en Belgique [management and organisation of sport in Belgium]. Bruxelles, Belgium: Fondation Roi Baudouin.
  • Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A.B., 1973. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ramadani, V. and Gerguri, S., 2011. Innovations: principles and strategies. Strategic Change, 20 (3/4), 101–110. doi:10.1002/jsc.888.
  • Ratten, V., 2011a. Social entrepreneurship and innovation in sports. International journal of social entrepreneurship and innovation, 1 (1), 42–54. doi:10.1504/IJSEI.2011.039811.
  • Ratten, V., 2011b. Sport-based entrepreneurship: towards a new theory of entrepreneurship and sport management. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 7 (1), 57–69. doi:10.1007/s11365-010-0138-z.
  • Ratten, V. and Ferreira, J., 2017. Sport entrepreneurship and innovation. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  • Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., and Sambrook, S., 2011. Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Management decision, 49 (1), 73–86. doi:10.1108/00251741111094446.
  • Sabatier, P. and Mazmanian, D., 1983. Policy implementation. Encyclopedia of policy sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Sabatier, P.A., 1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of public policy, 6 (01), 21–48. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003846.
  • Scheerder, J., Zintz, T., and Delheye, P., 2011. The organisation of sports in Belgium. Between public, economic and social profit. In: C. Sobry, ed. Sports governance in the world: a socio-historic approach. The organization of sport in Europe: a patch-work of institutions, with few shared points. Paris: Le Manuscrit, 84–113.
  • Shilbury, D. and Ferkins, L., 2011. Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing leisure, 16 (2), 108–127. doi:10.1080/13606719.2011.559090.
  • Skille, E.Å., 2008. understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers a theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. International review for the sociology of sport, 43 (2), 181–200. doi:10.1177/1012690208096035.
  • Skinner, J., Stewart, B., and Edwards, A., 1999. Amateurism to professionalism: modelling organisational change in sporting organisations. Sport management review, 2 (2), 173–192. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(99)70095-1.
  • Slack, T. and Hinings, B., 1992. Understanding change in national sport organizations: an integration of theoretical perspectives. Journal of sport management, 6 (2), 114–132. doi:10.1123/jsm.6.2.114.
  • Stewart, W.H. and Roth, P.L., 2001. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: a meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 86 (1), 145–153. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.145.
  • Subramanian, A. and Nilakanta, S., 1996. Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24 (6), 631–647. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X.
  • Taylor, P., 2004. Driving up sport participation: sport and volunteering. Sport England, ed. Driving up participation: the challenge for sport. London: Sport England, 103–110.
  • Tushman, M.L. and O’Reilly, C.A., 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38 (4), 8–30. doi:10.2307/41165852.
  • Van De Ven, A.H., 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32 (5), 590–607. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590.
  • Van Meter, D.S. and Van Horn, C.E., 1975. The policy implementation process a conceptual framework. Administration & society, 6 (4), 445–488. doi:10.1177/009539977500600404.
  • Vos, S., et al., 2012. The value of human resources in non-public sports providers. The importance of volunteers in non-profit sports clubs versus professionals in for-profit fitness and health clubs. International journal of sport management and marketing, 11 (1/2), 3–25. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2012.045487.
  • Walker, R.M., 2008. An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: towards a configuration approach. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18 (4), 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026.
  • Wemmer, F., Emrich, E., and Koenigstorfer, J., 2016. The impact of coopetition-based open innovation on performance in nonprofit sports clubs. European sport management quarterly, 16 (3), 341–363. doi:10.1080/16184742.2016.1164735.
  • Wemmer, F. and Koenigstorfer, J., 2016. Open innovation in nonprofit sports clubs. VOLUNTAS: international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 27 (4), 1923–1949. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9571-5.
  • Winand, M. and Hoeber, L., 2017. Innovation capability of non-profit organisations. In: V. Ratten and J. Ferreira, eds. Sport entrepreneurship. Oxon, UK: Routledge, 13–30.
  • Winand, M., et al., 2013a. Fédérations sportives innovantes: attitude, perceptions et champions de l’innovation [Innovative sport federations: attitude, perceptions and innovation champions]. Revue Interdisciplinaire sur le Management et l’Humanisme, 6, 6–21.
  • Winand, M., et al., 2016. Do non-profit sport organisations innovate? Types and preferences of service innovation within regional sport federations. Innovation: management, policy and practice, 18 (3), 289–308. doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1235985.
  • Winand, M., et al., 2014. A unified model of non-profit sport organizations performance: perspectives from the literature. Managing leisure, 19 (2), 121–150. doi:10.1080/13606719.2013.859460.
  • Winand, M., et al., 2013b. Determinants of service innovation: a typology of sports federations. International journal of sport management and marketing, 13 (1/2), 55–73. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2013.055194.
  • Winand, M., Zintz, T., and Scheerder, J., 2012. A financial management tool for sport federations. Sport, business and management: an international journal, 2 (3), 225–240. doi:10.1108/20426781211261539.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.