From ‘passive custodian’ to ‘active advocate’: tracing the emergence and sport-internal transformative effects of sport policy advocacy

References

• Adams, A., 2011. Between modernisation and mutual aid: the changing perception of voluntary sports clubs in England. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3, 23–43. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.544663
   Google Scholar
• Aggestål, A. and Fahlén, J., 2015. Managing sport for public health: approaching contemporary problems with traditional solutions. Social inclusion, 3, 108–117. doi:10.17645/si.v3i3.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almog-Bar, M. and Schmid, H., 2014. Advocacy activities by nonprofit human services organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 43, 11–35. doi:10.1177/0899764013483212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., 2003. Critical organization theory. In: B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón, eds. The northern lights: organization theory in Scandinavia. Malmö: Liber, 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M., Johansson, H., and Scaramuzzino, R., 2017. Advocacy compromised: how financial, organizational and institutional factors shape advocacy strategies of civil society organizations. Voluntas. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9900-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N.A. and Norberg, J.R., 2010. Sports policy and politics–the Scandinavian way. Sport in society, 13, 567–582. doi:10.1080/17430431003616191
   Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N.A. and Rommetvedt, H., 2006. Sport and politics. International review for the sociology of sport, 41, 7–27. doi:10.1177/1012690206073146
   Google Scholar
• Boris, E. and Maronick, M., 2014. Shaping the government-nonprofit partnership: direct and indirect advocacy. In: R.J. Pekkanen, S. Rathgeb Smith, and Y. Tsujnika, eds. Nonprofits & advocacy: engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University press, 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Centrum för idrottsforskning., 2018. Statens stöd till idrotten. Uppföljning 2017. Stockholm: Centrum för idrottsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, M., Stephens, L., and Galaskiewicz, J., 2004. Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American sociological review, 69, 292–316. doi:10.1177/000312240406900207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, C.D. and Grønberg, K.A., 2007. Nonprofit advocacy organizations: their characteristics and activities. Social science quarterly, 88, 259–281. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P.M., et al., 2010. Varieties of democracy: interest groups and corporatist committees in Scandinavian policy making. Voluntas, 21, 22–40. doi:10.1007/s11266-009-9105-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo, J.M. and Richter, B.K., 2014. Advancing empirical research on lobbying. Annual review of political science, 17, 163–185. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L.P., 2007. Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies: organizational factors as correlates to advocacy behavior. Journal of community practice, 15, 139–158. doi:10.1300/J125v15n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L.P., 2008. Developing a progressive advocacy program within a human services agency. Administration in social work, 32, 25–48. doi:10.1300/J147v32n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B. and Holmen Waldahl, R., 2007. Policy-making in sport: the Norwegian case. International review for the sociology of sport, 42, 201–216. doi:10.1177/1012690207084753
   Google Scholar
• Esser, H., 1993. The rationality of everyday behavior. A rational choice reconstruction of the theory of action by Alfred Schütz. Rationality and society, 5, 7–31. doi:10.1177/1043463193005001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., 2017. The trust–mistrust dynamic in the public governance of sport: exploring the legitimacy of performance measurement systems through end-users’ perceptions. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9, 707–722. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1348965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., Eliasson, I., and Wickman, K., 2015. Resisting self-regulation: an analysis of sport policy programme making and implementation in Sweden. International journal of sport policy and politics, 7, 391–406. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.925954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J. and Stenling, C., 2015. Sport policy in Sweden. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8, 515–531. doi:10.1080/19406940.2015.1063530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B. and Halpin, D., 2018. How do interest groups legitimate their policy advocacy? Reconsidering linkage and internal democracy in times of digital disruption. Public administration, 96, 23–35. doi:10.1111/padm.12364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyall, R., 2017. Nonprofits as advocates and providers: A conceptual framework. Policy studies journal, 45, 121–143. doi:10.1111/psj.v45.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrow, E.E. and Hasenfeld, Y., 2014. Institutional logics, moral frames, and advocacy: explaining the purpose of advocacy among nonprofit human services organizations. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 43, 80–98. doi:10.1177/0899764012468061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. and Houlihan, B., 2006. Governing under advanced liberalism: sport policy and the social investment state. Policy sciences, 40, 55–71. doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9034-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg, K. and Prakash, A., 2017. Advances in research on nonprofit advocacy and civic engagement. Voluntas, 28, 877–887. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9712-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., 2017. Social marketisation and policy influence of third sector organisations: evidence from the UK. Voluntas, 28, 1209–1225. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9853-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.G., 2006. Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In: W.W. Powell and R.S. Steinberg, eds. The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 307–332.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. and Ali, A.E., 2018. Ecological modernization and the 2014 NHL Sustainability Report. Sociology of sport journal, 35, 49–57. doi:10.1123/ssj.2017-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C.A. and Yackee, S.W., 2009. A political consequence of contracting: organized interests and state agency decision making. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19, 579–602. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikulis, L.M., 2000. Continuity and change in governance and decision making in national sport organizations: institutional explanations. Journal of sport management, 14, 293–320. doi:10.1123/jsm.14.4.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikulis, L.M., Slack, T., and Hinings, B., 1992. Institutionally specific design archetypes: A framework for understanding change in national sport organizations. International review for the sociology of sport, 27, 344–368. doi:10.1177/101269029202700405
   Google Scholar
• Kimberlin, S.E., 2010. Advocacy by nonprofits: roles and practices of core advocacy organizations and direct service agencies. Journal of policy practice, 9, 164–182. doi:10.1080/15588742.2010.487249
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S., 2009. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. 2nd. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S., 2009. A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International journal of research & method in education, 32, 25–38. doi:10.1080/17437270902759931
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, K. and Goerdel, H.T., 2009. Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public performance & management review, 32, 514–536. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576320402
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-Level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., 2007. Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity, 39, 29–54. doi:10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300077
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J., 2018. Fear the government? A meta-analysis of the impact of government funding on nonprofit advocacy engagement. American review of public administration, 48, 203–218. doi:10.1177/0275074016680024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusted, J. and O’Gorman, J., 2010. The impact of New Labour’s modernisation agenda on the English grass-roots football workforce. Managing leisure, 15, 140–154. doi:10.1080/13606710903448236
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, N.P., 2004. Privatizing the welfare state: non-profit community-based organizations as political actors. American sociological review, 69, 265–291. doi:10.1177/000312240406900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, H.E. and Fuchs, A., 2014. From corporatism to open networks? Structural changes in German sport policy-making. International journal of sport policy and politics, 6, 327–348. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.812573
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.E., 2008. New sociology of knowledge: historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In: R. Greenwood, et al., eds. The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 519–538.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J.E., 2010. Organizational resources and environmental incentives: understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human services nonprofits. Social service review, 84, 57–76. doi:10.1086/652681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, J.E., 2011. Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: what tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 40, 435–457. doi:10.1177/0899764009346335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, J.E., 2012. Keeping the lights on: how government funding concerns drive advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22, 841–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayr, M., Schneider, U., and Meyer, M., 2015. Public funding and its impact on nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 44, 297–318. doi:10.1177/0899764013513350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öberg, P. and Svensson, T., 2012. Civil society and deliberative democracy: have voluntary organisations faded from national public politics? Scandinavian political studies, 35, 246–271. doi:10.1111/scps.2012.35.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österlind, M. and Fahlén, J., 2015. Reconsidering the epistemology of the Swedish sports model through the lens of governmentality: notes on the state-civil society relationship, government, power and social change. Idrott, Historia & Samhälle: Svenska Idrottshistoriska Föreningens Årsskrift 2015, 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, P., 2016. Interest organizations in the policy process. In: J. Pierre, ed. The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 663–668.
   Google Scholar
• Riksidrottsförbundet, 2010. Idrotts-Sverige–en presentation av Riksidrottsförbundet. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Riksidrottsförbundet, 2015. Verksamhetsinriktning med ekonomiska planer. Riksidrottsförbundet/SISU Idrottsutbildarna 2016–2016. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Sam, M., 2009. The public management of sport. Wicked problems, challenges and dilemmas. Public management review, 11, 499–514. doi:10.1080/14719030902989565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, M. and Rongland, L.-T., 2016. Building sport’s legitimacy in Norway and New Zealand. International review for the sociology of sport. A-head-of-print. DOI: 10.1177/1012690216671515
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., 1945. On multiple realities. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 5, 533–576. doi:10.2307/2102818
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D. and Ferkins, L., 2011. Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing leisure, 16, 108–127. doi:10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
   Google Scholar
• SISU Idrottsutbildarna, 2010. Organisationsutredningen. Idrottens lokala och regionala organisation. Stockholm: SISU Idrottsutbildarna.
   Google Scholar
• Skille, E., 2008. Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: A theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. International review for the sociology of sport, 43, 81–200. doi:10.1177/1012690208096035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skille, E. and Säfvenbom, R., 2011. Sport policy in Norway. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3, 289–299. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.547867
   Google Scholar
• Sport and Citizenship, 2017. Sport and Citizenship. Sport serving society [online]. Available from: https://www.sportetcitoyennete.com/en/
   Google Scholar
• Sport Matters, 2017. Sport Matters. Where Canadian sport connects [online]. Available from: http://sportmatters.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Sports Think Tank, 2017. Sports think tank [online]. Available from: http://www.sportsthinktank.com
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., 2013. The introduction of drive-in sport in community sport organizations as an example of organizational non-change. Journal of sport management, 27, 497–509. doi:10.1123/jsm.27.6.497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenling, C. and Sam, M., 2017. Tensions and contradictions in sport’s question for legitimacy as a political actor: the politics of Swedish public sport policy hearings. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9, 691–705. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1348382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strittmatter, A.-M. and Skille, E., 2016. Boosting youth sport? Implementation of Norwegian youth sport policy through the 2016 lillehammer winter youth olympic games. Sport in society, 20, 144–160. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1124568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, R., 2000. Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the sociology of organizations, 17, 217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Stuij, M. and Stokvis, R., 2015. Sport, health and the genesis of physical activity policy in the Netherlands. International journal of sport policy and politics, 7, 217–232. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.962073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M., 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20, 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacon, R. and Walters, G., 2016. Modernisation and governance in UK national governing bodies of sport: how modernisation influences the way board members perceive and enact their roles. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8, 363–381. doi:10.1080/19406940.2016.1194874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. and Tacon, R., 2018. The ‘codification’ of governance in the non-profit sport sector in the UK. European sport management quarterly. doi:10.1080/16184742.2017.1418405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Chatziefstathiou, D., Mansfield, L., and Dowse, S., (2015). The olympic games and raising sport participation: a systematic review of evidence and an interrogation of policy for a demonstration effect. European sport management quarterly, 15 (2), 195–226. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.998695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., 2018. Advancing our understanding of the EU sports policy: the socio-cultural model of sports regulation and players’ agents. International journal of sport policy and politics, 10, 353–369. doi:10.1080/19406940.2018.1432671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, A., 1999. Corporatism revisited. The legacy of history and the German non-profit sector. Voluntas, 10, 37–49. doi:10.1023/A:1021439703650
   Google Scholar