4,441
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sport clubs, policy networks, and local politics

&
Pages 479-499 | Received 12 Dec 2019, Accepted 26 Feb 2021, Published online: 01 Apr 2021

References

  • Alexander, T., Thibault, L., and Frisby, W. 2008; Avoiding separation: sport partner perspectives on a long-term inter-organizational relationsship. International journal of sport management and marketing, 3 (3): 263–280. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2008.017192
  • An, W. and Liu, Y.-H. 2016; keyplayer: an R package for locating key players in social networks. The R Journal, 8 (1): 257–268. doi:10.32614/RJ-2016-018
  • Ansell, C., Bichir, R., and Zhou, S. 2016; Who says networks, says Oligarchy? oligarchies as “rich club” networks. Connections, 35 (1): 20–32. doi:10.17266/35.2.2
  • Ansell, C., Lundin, M., and Öberg, P. 2017; How learning aggregates: a social network analysis of learning between Swedish municipalities. Local government studies, 43 (6): 903–926. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1342626
  • Babiak, K. and Thibault, L. 2008; Managing inter-organisational relationships: the art of plate spinning. International journal of sport management and marketing, 3 (3): 281–302. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2008.017193
  • Babiak, K. and Thibault, L. 2009; Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 38 (1): 117–143. doi:10.1177/0899764008316054
  • Babiak, K. and Willem, A. 2017. Interorganizational relationships in sports: from theory to practice. In: R. Hoye and M.M. Parent, eds.. The sage handbook of sport management. London: Sage, 273-293.
  • Bakken, A. 2017. Sosiale forskjeller i ungdomsidretten - fattigdomsproblem elle sosial gradient? In: Bufdir, ed.. Oppvekstrapporten 2017. Oslo: BUFDIR, 148-167.
  • Barabasi, A.-L. 2003. Linked. how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Plume.
  • Barnes, M., Cousens, L., and MacLean, J., 2018. Trust and collaborative ties in a community sport network. Managing sport and leisure, 22, 310–324. doi:10.1080/23750472.2018.1465840
  • Belbo, J.S. 2018. Networks in the local sport sector: who is linked to whom, and what does it mean? A social network analysis of one Norwegian municipality. In. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Master’s thesis.
  • Bergsgard, N.A. 2017; Spillet om idrettsanleggene – hvilke ressurser er virksomme i lokale anleggsprosesser [The struggle for sport facilities - which resources matter in local policy processes]. Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift, 1 (2): 171–187. doi:10.18261/.2535-2512-2017-02-05
  • Bergsgard, N.A., et al. 2007. Sport policy: a comparative analysis of stability and change. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Bergsgard, N.A. and Nødland, S.I. 2009. Kontaktmønstre og innflytelse i den lokale idrettspolitikken: nettverk eller hierarki? In: B. Enjolras and R.H. Waldahl, eds.. Frivillige organisasjoner og offentlig politikk. Oslo: Novus, 117-145.
  • Bergsgard, N.A. and Rommetvedt, H. 2006; Sport and politics. the case of Norway. International review for the sociology of sport, 41 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1177/1012690206073146
  • Borgatti, S.P. 2004; Centrality and network flow. Social networks, 27 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
  • Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Johnson, J.C. 2013. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.
  • Breuer, C., et al. 2017. Characteristics of European sports clubs. A comparison of the structure, management, voluntary work and social integration among sports clubs across ten European countries. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
  • Burt, R. 2005. Brokerage & closure. an introduciton to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Butts, C.T. 2008; Social network analysis with sna. Journal of statistical software, 24 (6): doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i06
  • Castiglione, D., Van Deth, J.W., and Wolleb, G., Eds., 2008. The handbook of social capital. Oxford: Oxford Univerisity Press.
  • Coleman, J.S. 2000. Social capital in the creation of human capital. In: E.L. Lesser, ed.. Knowledge and social capital. Boston: Butterworth & Heinemann, 17-42.
  • Corritore, M., Goldberg, A., and Srivastava, S.B. 2020; Duality in diversity: how intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65 (2): 359–394. doi:10.1177/0001839219844175
  • Cousens, L. and Barnes, M. 2009; Sport delivery in a highly socialized environment: a case study of embeddedness. Journal of sport management, 23 (5): 574–590. doi:10.1123/jsm.23.5.574
  • Dickson, G. and Cousens, L. 2008; Introduction. International journal of sport management and marketing, 3 (3): 163–166.
  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983; The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48 (2): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
  • Dobbels, L., et al. 2018; Why network structure and coordination matter: a social network analysis of sport for disadvantaged people. International review for the sociology of sport, 53 (5): 572–593. doi:10.1177/1012690216666273
  • Doherty, A. and Misener, K. 2008. Community sport network. In: M. Nicholson and R. Hoye, eds.. Sport and Social Capital. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 113-142.
  • Dowling, M., Edwards, J., and Washington, M. 2014; Understanding the concept of professionalization in sport management research. Sport management review, 17 (4): 520–529. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.02.003
  • Edwards, M.B. and Rowe, K. 2019; Managing sport for health: an introduction to the special issue. Sport management review, 22 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.12.006
  • Eimhjellen, I. and Loga, J. 2017. Nye samarbeidsrelasjoner mellom kommuner og frivillige aktører. Rapport 9/17. Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.
  • Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. 1994; Network anlaysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American journal of sociology, 99(6): 1411-1456.
  • Fahlen, J., Eliasson, I., and Wickman, K. 2014; Resisting self-regulation: an analysis of sport policy programme making and implementation in Sweden. International journal of sport policy and politics, 7(3): 1-16. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.925954
  • Freeman, L.C. 1978; Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1 (3): 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  • Granovetter, M. 1973; The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
  • Greve, H. 2005; Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organization Studies, 26 (7): 1025–1047. doi:10.1177/0170840605053539
  • Greve, H., Rowley, T., and Shipilov, A. 2014. Network advantage: how to unlock value from your alliances and partnerships. New York: John Wiley.
  • Grix, J. 2010; The ‘governance debate’ and the study of sport policy. International journal of sport policy and politics, 2 (2): 159–171. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.488061
  • Hall, M., et al. 2003. The capacity to serve: a qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
  • Harris, J.K. 2014. An introduction to exponential random graph modeling. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Hunter, D.R., et al. 2008; ergm: a package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of statistical software, 24, 3.
  • Ibsen, B. and Levinsen, K. 2019; Collaboration between sports clubs and public institutions. European journal for sport and society, 16 (2): 187–204. doi:10.1080/16138171.2019.1610619
  • Ingold, K. and Leifeld, P. 2016; Structural and institutional determinants to influence reputation. Journal of public administration research and theory, 26(1): 11-18. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.925954
  • Jones, G.J., et al. 2017; Collabortive advantages: the role of interorganizational partnerships for youth sport nonprofit organizations. Journal of sport management, 31(148-160: 10.1123/jsm.2016-0118
  • Jones, G.J., et al. 2018; A structural perspective of cross-sector partnerships involving youth sport nonprofit organizations. European sport management quarterly, 18 (2): 133–155. doi:10.1080/16184742.2017.1322625
  • Kuper, S. and Szymanski, S. 2014. Soccernomics. 3 edition. London: Nation books.
  • Lazer, D., 2011. Networks in political science: back to the future. PS, political science & politics, 44, 61–68. doi:10.1017/S1049096510001873
  • Leifeld, P. and Schneider, V. 2012; Information exchange in policy networks. American journal of political science, 53 (3): 731–744. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00580.x
  • Lin, N., Cook, K., and Burt, R., eds.. 2001; Social capital. Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Lindsey, I. 2009; Collaboration in local sport services in England: issues emerging from case studies of two local authority areas. International journal of sport policy and politics, 1 (1): 71–88. doi:10.1080/19406940802681210
  • Lindsey, I. 2013. Partnership working and sports development. In: B. Houlihan and M. Green, eds.. Routledge handbook of sport development. London: Routledge, 517-529.
  • Lucidarme, S., Babiak, K., and Willem, A. 2018; Governmental power in elite sport networks: a resource-dependency perspective. European sport management quarterly, 18 (3): 348–372. doi:10.1080/16184742.2017.1405998
  • Lucidarme, S., Cardon, G., and Willem, A. 2016; A comparative study of health promotion networks: configurations of determinants for network effectiveness. Public management review, 18 (8): 1163–1217. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1088567
  • Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., and Robbins, G., eds.. 2013; Exponential random graph model for social networks. Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacLean, J., Cousens, L., and Barnes, M. 2011; Look who’s linked with whom: a case study of one community basketball network. Journal of sport management, 25 (6): 562–575. doi:10.1123/jsm.25.6.562
  • McPherson, J.M. and Smith-Lovin, L. 1987; Homophily in voluntary organizations: status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American sociological reveiw, 52 (3): 370–379. doi:10.2307/2095356
  • McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J.M. 2001; Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27 (1): 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  • Misener, K. and Doherty, A. 2013; Understanding capacity through the processes and outcomes of interorganizational relationships in nonprofit community sport organizations. Sport management review, 16 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2012.07.003
  • Misener, K. and Doherty, A. 2014; In support of sport: examining the relationship between community sport organizations and sponsors. Sport management review, 17 (4): 493–506. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2013.12.002
  • Moody, J. 2001; Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American journal of sociology, 107 (3): 679–716. doi:10.1086/338954
  • Morris, M., Handcock, M.S., and Hunter, D.R. 2008; Specification of exponential-family random graph models: terms and computational aspects. Journal of statistical software, 24 (4): 24. doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i04
  • NIF. 2015. Idrettspolitisk dokument 2015-2019. Oslo: NIF.
  • Oliver, C. 1991; Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16 (1): 145–179. doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
  • Provan, K.G. and Milward, H.B. 2001; Do networks really work? a framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public administration review, 61 (4): 414–423. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00045
  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Quatman, C. and Chelladurai, P. 2008; Social network theory and analysis: a complementary lens for inquiry. Journal of sport management, 22 (3): 338–360. doi:10.1123/jsm.22.3.338
  • R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rivera, M.T., Soderstrom, S.B.S., and Uzzi, B. 2010; Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual review of sociology, 36 (1): 91–115. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
  • Robins, G. 2015. Doing social network research. London: Sage.
  • Rommetvedt, H. 2002. Idrett og politikk – perspektiver og utviklingstrekk. In: P. Mangset and H. Rommetvedt, eds.. Idrett og politikk – kampsport eller lagspill? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 9-10.
  • Seippel, Ø. 2006; Sport and social capital. Acta Sociologica, 49 (2): 169–185. doi:10.1177/0001699306064771
  • Seippel, Ø. 2008. Public policies, social capital and voluntary sport. In: M. Nicholson and R. Hoye, eds.. Sport and social capital. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 233-256.
  • Seippel, Ø. 2019; Professionalization of voluntary sport organizations – a study of the quality club programme of the norwegian football association. European sport management quarterly, 19 (5): 666–683. doi:10.1080/16184742.2019.1579240
  • Seippel, Ø. 2020. Norway: the ambiguity of sports clubs and nonsports social functions. In: S. Nagel, et al., eds.. Functions of sports clubs in European societies. Cham: Springer, 211-234.
  • Seippel, Ø. and Skille, E. 2015. Sport clubs in Norway. In: C. Breuer, et al., eds.. Sport clubs in Europe. New York: Springer, 309-324.
  • Seippel, Ø. and Skille, E. 2019. Sports participation in Norway. In: K. Green, T. Sigurjónsson, and E. Skille, eds.. Sport in scandinavia and the Nordic Countries. London: Routledge, 108-135.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In: J. March, ed.. Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 142-193.
  • Støckel, J.T., et al. 2010; Sport for children and youth in the Scandinavian countries. Sport in society, 13 (4): 625–642. doi:10.1080/17430431003616332
  • Swierzy, P., Wicker, P., and Breuer, C. 2018; The impact of organizational capacity of voluntary engagement in sport clubs: a multi-level analysis. Sport management review, 21 (3): 307–320. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.08.001
  • Thibault, L., Frisby, W., and Kikulis, L.M. 1999; Interorganizational linkages in the delivery of local leisure services in Canada: responding to economic, political and social pressures. Managing Leisure, 4 (3): 125–141. doi:10.1080/136067199375805
  • Thibault, L. and Harvey, J. 1997; Fostering interorganizational Linkages in the Canadian Sport delivery system. Journal of sport management, 11 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1123/jsm.11.1.45
  • Waldahl, R.H. 2009. Sampill mellom idrett og kommune. Idrettsrådene - organisasjon, rolle og oppgaver. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning. /2009: 6.
  • Wäsche, H. 2015; Interorganizational cooperation in sport tourism: a social network analysis. Sport management review, 18 (4): 542–554. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2015.01.003
  • Wäsche, H., et al. 2017; Social network analysis in sport research: an emerging paradigm. European Journal for sport and society, 14 (2): 138–165. doi:10.1080/16138171.2017.1318198
  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis. methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D.J. 2004; The ”new” science of networks. Annual review of sociology, 30 (1): 243–270. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
  • Whitepaper nr 26. (2012). Report to the storting: den norske idrettsmodellen [The Norwegian Sport Model]. Oslo: Ministry of Culture.
  • Wicker, P., et al. 2013; The link between resource problems and interorganisational relationships: a quantitative study of Western European sport clubs. Managing Leisure, 18 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/13606719.2012.742226
  • Wollebæk, D. and Selle, P. 2007; Origins of social capital: socialization and institutionalization approaches compared. Journal of civil society, 3 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/17448680701390638