Sample collection as a social process: the influence of interaction between doping control officers and athletes on the implementation of anti-doping policy

References

• Bartels, K.P.R., 2013. Public encounters: the history and future of face-to-face contact between public professionals and citizens. Public administration, 91 (2), 469–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdon, F., et al., 2014. French speaking athletes’ experience and perception regarding the whereabouts reporting system and therapeutic use exemptions. Performance enhancement & health, 3 (3–4), 153–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Buffat, A., 2015. When and why discretion is weak or strong: the case of taxing officers in a public unemployment fund. In: P. Hupe, M. Hill, and A. Buffat, eds. Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press, 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Casini, L., 2009. Global hybrid public-private bodies: the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). International organizations law review, 6 (2), 421–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/157237409X477644
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., 2015. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K.C., 1969. Discretionary justice: a preliminary inquire. Baton Rouge: Lousiana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, V., 2010. The bureaucrat and the poor. Encounters in french welfare offices. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., 2007. Beyond ‘street level bureaucrats’: re-interpreting the role of front-line public-sector workers. Critical policy analysis, 1 (2), 217–234.
   Google Scholar
• Efverström, A., et al., 2016. Anti-doping and legitimacy: an international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8 (3), 491–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2016.1170716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, A. and Brand, R., 2014. Urination difficulties during doping controls: an act of rebellion? Journal of clinical sport psychology, 8 (2), 204–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0022
   Google Scholar
• Elbe, A. and Overbye, M., 2014. Urine doping controls: the athletes’ perspective. International journal of sport policy and politics, 6 (2), 227–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.801361
   Google Scholar
• Elbe, A. and Overbye, M., 2015. Providing support for athletes with negative experiences during urine doping controls. Journal of sport psychology in action, 6 (3), 188–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2015.1072120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, A., Schlegel, M.M., and Brand, R., 2012. Psychogenic urine retention during doping controls: consequences for elite athletes. Performance enhancement & health, 1 (2), 66–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2012.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Gleaves, J. and Christiansen, A.V., 2019. Athletes’ perspectives on WADA and the code: a review and analysis. International journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (2), 341–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1577901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofen, A., 2014. Mind the gap: dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of public administration research and theory, 24 (2), 473–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1961. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth: Ravenio Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1989. The presentation of self in everyday life. Cambridge: Penguin Books, orig, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S., 2019. Achieving compliance with the world anti-doping code: learning from the implementation of another international agreement. International journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (2), 247–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1550798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. and Loland, S., 2005. What is efficient doping control? A study of procedures and their justification in the planning and carrying out of doping control in sport. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences/Anti-Doping Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D.V. and Loland, S., 2009. Elite athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime? European journal of sport science, 9 (1), 3–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802594219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M.A., et al., 2018. Frontline employees in the health clinic: impression managementmultiplexing when performing in-the-round. Communication monographs, 85 (3), 309–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1429638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 1999. Anti‐doping policy in sport: the politics of international policy co‐ordination. Public Administration, 77 (2), 311–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2002. Managing compliance in international anti‐doping policy: the world anti‐doping code. European sport management quarterly, 2 (3), 188–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740208721922
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2014. Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: an analysis of the 2009 world anti-doping code. Sport management review, 17 (3), 265–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. and Buffat, A., 2014. A public service gap: capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public management review, 16 (4), 548–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. and Hill, M., 2007. Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public administration, 85 (2), 279–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., Hill, M., and Buffat, A., 2015. Introduction: defining and understanding street-level bureaucracy. In: P. Hupe, M. Hill, and A. Buffat, eds. Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkman, J.P. and Groenewegen, P., 2019. On frontline workers as bureau-political actors: the case of civil-military crisis management. Administration & Society, 51 (7), 1148–1170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718780581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, M., 2016. Mega event organizing committees: investment in anti-doping personnel. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Krugers, J., 2020. ‘Dopingcontroleurs zijn ook gewoon mensen’. Een onderzoek naar de invloed van sociale interacties op de implementatie van het antidopingbeleid tijdens het uitoefenen van dopingcontroles. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. and Seok, C., 2018. A critical review on operation and management system of doping control officer in Korea anti-doping agency. In: Park J., Loia V., Yi G., Sung Y., eds. Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing. CUTE 2017, CSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 474. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service. orig. 1980. edn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P.K., 2008. Goffman on organizations. Organization Studies, 29 (5), 677–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. and Musheno, M., 2000. State agent or citizen agent: two narratives of discretion. Journal of public administration research and theory, 10 (2), 329–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• Overbye, M., et al., 2015. Athletes’ perceptions of anti-doping sanctions: the ban from sport versus social, financial and self-imposed sanctions. Sport in Society, 18 (3), 364–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2014.982539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbye, M., 2016. Doping control in sport: an investigation of how elite athletes perceive and trust the functioning of the doping testing system in their sport. Sport management review, 19 (1), 6–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbye, M., 2017. Deterrence by risk of detection? An inquiry into how elite athletes perceive the deterrent effect of the doping testing regime in their sport. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 24 (2), 206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbye, M. and Wagner, U., 2014. Experiences, attitudes and trust: an inquiry into elite athletes’ perception of the whereabouts reporting system. International journal of sport policy and politics, 6 (3), 407–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.791712
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., 2005. Governing doped bodies: the world anti-doping agency and the global culture of surveillance. Cultural studies, critical methodologies, 5 (2), 174–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605274945
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C., Postler, T., and Oberhoffer, R., 2013. Dopingkontrollen in Deutschland. Eine Befragung von Athleten und Dopingkontrolleuren. Sportwissenschaft, 43 (1), 20–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-013-0283-y
   Google Scholar
• Pound, R.W., McLaren, R.H., and Robertson, J., 2015. The Independent Commission Report #1. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Qvarfordt, A., et al., 2021. Limitations and duties: elite athletes’ perceptions of compliance with anti-doping rules. Sport in Society, 24 (4), 551–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1681404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D., et al., 2019. Legitimacy driven change at the world anti-doping agency. International Journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (2), 233–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1544580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluggett, B., 2011. Sport’s doping game: surveillance in the biotech age. Sociology of sport journal, 28 (4), 387–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.28.4.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, K. and Elbe, A., 2007. Wollen, aber nicht Können. Das Problem Dopingkontrolle. Leistungssport, 37 (4), 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, D.G., 2014. Comfortable being uncomfortable: a study of athlete and doping control officers’ relations. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., and Raaphorst, N., eds. 2018. Inspectors and enforcement at the front line of government. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2011. Doping control officer’s training tool kit. Montreal: WADA.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2014. Sample collection personnel. Recruitment, training, accreditation and re-accreditation guidelines. Montreal: WADA.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2019. World anti-doping code 2015 with 2019 amendments. Montreal: WADA.
   Google Scholar
• WADA, 2020. International Standard for Testing and investigations. Montreal: WADA.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. and Niner, P., 2005. The use of discretion in a rule-bound service: housing benefit administration and the introduction of discretionary housing payments in great britain. Public administration, 83 (1), 47–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1985. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehende Soziologie. orig. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1921/1922.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 2016. Die protestantische Ethik und der ‘Geist’ des Kapitalismus. orig. Heidelberg: Springer, 1904/1905.
   Google Scholar
• Woolway, T., et al., 2020. ‘Doing what is right and doing it right’: A mapping review of athletes’ perception of anti-doping legitimacy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 84. article 102865. 1–12. stylefix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar