References
- Ahrens, C. E., Cabral, G., & Abeling, S. (2009). Healing or hurtful: Sexual assault survivors’ interpretations of social reactions from support providers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 81–94. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01476.x
- Baum, N., Rahav, G., & Sharon, M. (2014). Heightened susceptibility to secondary traumatization: A meta-analysis of gender differences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(2), 111–122. doi:10.1037/h0099383
- Chasteen, A. L. (2001). Constructing rape: Feminism, change and women’s everyday understandings of sexual assault. Sociological Spectrum, 21(2), 101–139. doi:10.1080/02732170121403
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Frabutt, J. (2005). Focus on methods. In V. L. Bengston, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth- Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 63–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Office for Civil Rights. (2011). Dear colleague letter. Office of the Assistant Secretary. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/regulatory_matters_pdf/012507 _good_guidance.pdf
- Rich, K., & Seffrin, P. (2012). Police interviews of sexual assault reporters: Do attitudes matter? Violence and Victims, 27(2), 263–279. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.2.263