Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter

References

• Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33 (8), 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Carey, R., et al., 2008. Online courses for math teachers: comparing self-paced and facilitated cohort approaches [online]. Journal of technology, learning, and assessment, 7 (3). Available from: http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1630 [Accessed 11 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J.P. and Krutka, D.G., 2014a. Chat it up: everything you wanted to know about Twitter chats but were afraid to ask. Learning and leading with technology, 41 (5), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J.P. and Krutka, D.G., 2014b. How and why educators use Twitter: a survey of the field. Journal of research on technology in education, 46 (4), 414–434.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, L. and Lehman, K., 2011. Twitter in higher education. In: C. Wankel, ed. Educating educators with social media. Bingley: Emerald Group, 375–391.10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000001021
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, K., Jenkins, H., and McWilliams, J., 2013. New literacies in an age of participatory culture. In: H. Jenkins and W. Kelley, eds. Reading in a participatory culture: remixing Moby-Dick in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., 2003. Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S., et al., 2012. Impact of online professional development on teacher quality and student achievement in fifth grade mathematics. Journal of research on technology in education, 45 (1), 1–26.10.1080/15391523.2012.10782595
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M.R., 2011. Social media feeds freewheeling professional development. Education week, 31 (9), s13–s14.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., et al., 2009. A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of teacher education, 60 (1), 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodor, B.A., Sira, N., and Hausafus, C.O., 2010. Breaking down the walls of teacher isolation. Journal of family & consumer sciences education, 28 (1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., Eaker, R., and DuFour, R., 2005. On common ground: the power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. and Smith, A., 2013. Social media update 2013 [online]. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2013/SocialNetworking2013_P [Accessed 2 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Duncan-Howell, J., 2010. Teachers making connections: online communities as sources of professional learning. British journal of educational technology, 41 (2), 324–340.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., et al., 2013. Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of teacher education, 64 (5), 426–438.10.1177/0022487113494413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A., Humphreys, M., and Park, T., 2012. Grassroots professional development: how teachers use Twitter [online]. In: Proceedings of the 6th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, 5–7 June, Dublin, Ireland, 106–113. Available from: http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM12/paper/view/4585/4973 [Accessed 15 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M.L., et al., 2001. Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38 (3), 653–689.10.3102/00028312038003653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. and Lowe, S., 2012. The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of computer assisted learning, 28 (3), 183–194. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x.10.1111/jca.2012.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M.S., et al., 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38 (4), 915–945.10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P., 2004. Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H., 1985. Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social education, 49 (5), 376–379.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R., 2000. Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W.D. and Valli, L., 2007. Design principles for learner-centered professional development. In: W.D. Hawley and D.L. Rollie, eds. The keys to effective schools: educational reform as continuous improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J.W. and Brush, T.A., 2009. Teacher participation in online communities: why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of research on technology in education, 41 (3), 279–303.10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., et al., 2009. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., and Loken, E., 2011. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of computer assisted learning, 27 (2), 119–132.10.1111/jca.2011.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiorgi, Y. and Lymbouridou, C., 2009. The story of an online teacher community in Cyprus. Professional development in education, 35 (1), 119–138.10.1080/13674580802269059
   Google Scholar
• Kop, R., 2012. The unexpected connection: serendipity and human mediation in networked learning. Educational technology & society, 15 (2), 2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., and Jochems, W., 2003. Identifying pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in human behavior, 19 (3), 335–353.10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, D.F., 2004. The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. and Brett, C., 2013. What are student inservice teachers talking about in their online communities of practice? Investigating student inservice teachers’ experiences in a double-layered CoP. Journal of technology and teacher education, 21 (1), 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A. and Mace, D.P., 2010. Making practice public: teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of teacher education, 61 (1–2), 77–88. doi:10.1177/0022487109347319.10.1177/0022487109347319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D., 1975. Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. and Metzger, S.A., 2012. Reconceptualizing media literacy in the social studies: a pragmatist critique of the NCSS position statement on media literacy. Theory and research in social education, 40 (4), 436–455.10.1080/00933104.2012.724630
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J., et al., 2014. Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD: commentary in response to Fishman et al. ‘Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation’. Journal of teacher education, 65 (2), 172–176.10.1177/0022487113511497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, 1996. What matters most: teaching for America’s future [online]. New York: Teachers College Press. Available from: http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/WhatMattersMost.pdf [Accessed 24 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, 2003. No dream denied: a pledge to America’s children [online]. Washington, DC: Author. Available from: http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/no-dream-denied_summary_report.pdf [Accessed 24 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, N. and Preece, J., 2003. Silent participants: getting to know lurkers better. In: D. Fisher and C. Lueg, eds. From usernet to co webs: interacting with social information spaces. New York: Springer, 110–132.10.1007/978-1-4471-0057-7
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2009. Creating effective teaching and learning environments: first results from teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) [online]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_39263231_42980662_1_1_1_1,00.html [Accessed 25 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ranieri, M., Manca, S., and Fini, A., 2012. Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British journal of educational technology, 43 (5), 754–769.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risser, H.S., 2013. Virtual induction: a novice teacher’s use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network. Teaching & teacher education, 35, 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S.L. and Butler, B.M., 2014. Consumers and producers in the social studies classroom: how Web 2.0 technology can break the cycle of ‘teachers and machines’. In: W.B. Russell, ed. Digital social studies. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., et al., 2009. Face-to-face and online professional development for mathematics teachers: a comparative study. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 13 (2), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, M.S., Fusco, J., and Shank, P., 2002. Evolution of an online education community of practice. In: K.A. Renninger and W. Shumar, eds. Building virtual communities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 129–158.10.1017/CBO9780511606373
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, M.S., et al., 2009. Analyzing online teacher networks: cyber networks require cyber research tools. Journal of teacher education, 40 (1), 86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. and Tinti-Kane, H., 2013. Social media for teaching and learning [online]. Pearson Learning Solutions and Babson Survey Research Group. Available from: http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/assets/downloads/reports/social-media-for-teaching-and-learning-2013-report.pdf#view=FitH,0 [Accessed 15 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. and Grant, L., 2009. Researching the realities of social software use – an introduction. Learning, media and technology, 34 (2), 79–86.10.1080/17439880902921907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K., 2013. Professional learning of observers, collaborators, and contributors in a teacher-created online community in Korea. Asia pacific journal of education [online]. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2013.860004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, D., 2004. The looming danger of a two-tiered professional development system. Phi delta kappan, 86 (4), 304–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinthall, N.A., Reiman, A.J., and Thies-Sprinthall, L., 1996. Teacher professional development. In: J.P. Sikula, T.J. Buttery, and E. Guyton, eds. Handbook of research on teacher education. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 666–703.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J.W. and Hiebert, J., 1999. The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sujo de Montes, L.E. and Gonzales, C.L., 2000. Been there, done that: reaching teachers through distance education. Journal of technology and teacher education, 8 (4), 351–371.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., 2009. Homophily in MySpace. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 60 (2), 219–231.10.1002/asi.v60:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter, n.d. About [online]. Available from: https://twitter.com/about [Accessed 15 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., 2011. Tracing Twitter: the rise of a microblogging platform. International journal of media and cultural politics, 7 (3), 333–348. doi:10.1386/macp.7.3.333_1.10.1386/macp.7.3.333_1
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C. and Zembylas, M., 2004. Online professional development: lessons from the field. Education and training, 46 (6/7), 326–334.10.1108/00400910410555231
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L., 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R.C., et al., 2009. Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the US & abroad (Technical report). Oxford, OH: Learning Forward; Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Wesely, P.M., 2013. Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of teacher education, 64 (4), 305–318.10.1177/0022487113489032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.M., 2013. Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340 (6130), 310–313.10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K.S., et al., 2007. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007, No. 033) [online]. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Available from: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033.pdf [Accessed 2 February 2014].
   Google Scholar