The effect of an MEd program in science education on teachers’ professional development: an Israeli case study

References

• Adamson, S., et al., 2003. Reformed undergraduate instruction and its subsequent impact on secondary school teaching practice and student achievement. Journal of research in science teaching, 40 (10), 939–957.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33 (8), 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.L., 2004. Making the most of understanding by design. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D.K., Crawford, B.A., and Constas, M.A., 2012. A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of science teacher education, 23 (3), 291–318.10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C.E., 2004. Beyond decoupling: rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of education, 77 (3), 211–244.10.1177/003804070407700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Hug, B., and Lubienski, S., 2014. The effects of a master’s program on teachers’ science instruction: results from classroom observations, teacher reports, and student surveys. Journal of research in science teaching, 51 (2), 219–249.10.1002/tea.v51.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., et al., 2005. The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: how do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? In: Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., et al., 2009. Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teacher’s professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199.10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., et al., 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 24 (2), 81–112.10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J., et al., 2012. Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: a review of design features and quality of research. Studies in science education, 48 (2), 129–160.10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B.J. and Krajcik, J.S., 2003. What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? Science & education, 87 (4), 564–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M.S., et al., 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38 (4), 915–945.10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, E.M. and Hannafin, M.J., 2006. The collaborative apprenticeship model: situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and teacher education, 22 (2), 179–193.10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, P., et al., 2009. Highlights from TIMSS 2007: mathematics and science achievement of US fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context [online]. NCES 2009-001. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf [Accessed 25 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Haney, J. and McArthur, J., 2002. Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science & education, 86 (6), 783–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D., 1994. Authentic assessment: a handbook for educators. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, P.W., 2007. Teacher professional development in science. In: S. Abel and N. Lederman, eds. Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1177–1203.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, P.W., Beeth, M.E., and Thorley, N.R., 1998. Teaching for conceptual change. In: K. Tobin and B. Fraser, eds. Teaching for conceptual change, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 199–218.10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg, E.D. and Desimone, L.M., 2010. Professional development in the accountability context: building capacity to achieve standards. Educational psychologist, 45 (2), 89–106.10.1080/00461521003703052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, E., 2014. Classroom-based professional development training program. Professional development in education, 40 (2), 316–320.10.1080/19415257.2013.821085
   Google Scholar
• International Alliance of Leading Education Institutes, 2008. Transforming teacher education: redefined professionals for 21st century schools. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., 2007. Whole-school collaborative sustained professional development and science teacher change: signs of progress. Journal of science teacher education, 18 (4), 629–661.10.1007/s10972-007-9043-x
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., Pedder, D., and Doddington, C., 2013. Professional learning during a schools–university partnership master of education course: teachers’ perspectives of their learning experiences. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 19 (1), 33–49.10.1080/13540602.2013.744197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K., Shumow, L., and Lietz, S., 2001. Science education in an urban elementary school: case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science & education, 85 (2), 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. and Bloom, I., 2002. Evaluating college science and mathematics instruction. Journal of college science teaching, 31 (6), 388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., 1999. Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of research in science teaching, 36 (8), 916–929.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<>1.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, K., 2001. An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science & education, 86 (1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., 1995. Practices that support teacher development: transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi delta kappan, 76 (8), 591–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J., 2012. Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In: M. Kooy and K. van Veen, eds. Teacher learning that matters: international perspectives. New York: Routledge, 22–46.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., et al., 2003. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., 2006. Different countries, same science classes: students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International journal of science education, 28 (6), 591–613.10.1080/09500690500339621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIsaac, D. and Falconer, K., 2002. Reforming physics instruction via RTOP. The physics teacher, 40 (8), 479–485.10.1119/1.1526620
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S. and Eilks, I., 2008. A case study on German first year chemistry student teachers’ beliefs about chemistry teaching and their comparison with student teachers from other science teaching domains. Chemistry education research and practice, 9 (1), 25–34.10.1039/b801288c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markic, S. and Eilks, I., 2010. Freshman science student teachers’ beliefs about student- and teacher-centeredness: parallels and differences between chemistry and the other science teaching domains. Journal of chemical education, 87 (3), 335–339.10.1021/ed8000864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markic, S. and Eilks, I., 2012. A comparison of student teachers’ beliefs from four different science teaching domains using a mixed methods design. International journal of science education, 34 (4), 589–608.10.1080/09500693.2011.608092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M.R., 1992. Constructivism and empiricism: an incomplete divorce. Research in science education, 22 (1), 299–307.10.1007/BF02356909
   Google Scholar
• Monet, J. and Etkina, E., 2008. Fostering self-reflection and meaningful learning: earth science professional development for middle school science teachers. Journal of science teacher education, 19 (5), 455–475.10.1007/s10972-008-9106-7
   Google Scholar
• Musset, P., 2010. Initial teacher education and continuing training policies in a comparative perspective: current practices in OECD countries and a literature review on potential effects. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 48, OECD.10.1787/5kmbphh7s47h-en
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 2000. Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B., 2012. Science teachers’ meaning-making when involved in a school-based professional development project. Journal of science teacher education, 23 (6), 621–649.10.1007/s10972-012-9300-5
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2005. Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers – final summary report: teachers matter. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. and Dillon, J., 2008. Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W., et al., 2007. What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American educational research journal, 44 (4), 921–958.10.3102/0002831207308221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piburn, M., et al., 2000. Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) reference manual. ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3 [online]. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Board of Regents. Available from: http://www.acept.asu.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, D.L., 1998. Transferring theory into practice: a model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 35 (1), 73–88.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada, D., et al., 2002. Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). School science and mathematics, 102 (6), 245–253.10.1111/ssm.2002.102.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Shriki, A. and Lavy, I., 2012. Perceptions of Israeli mathematics teachers regarding their professional development needs. Professional development in education, 38 (3), 411–433.10.1080/19415257.2011.626062
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, P., et al., 1999. Beginning teachers: beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of research in science teaching, 36 (8), 930–954.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<>1.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S. and Schreiner, C., 2005. How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific forum on science learning and teaching, 6 (2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., 2014. An innovative model of professional development to enhance the teaching and learning of primary science in Irish schools. Professional development in education, 40 (3), 467–487.10.1080/19415257.2013.830274
   Google Scholar
• Superior Committee on Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education in Israel, 1992. Tomorrow 98 (English ed.). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J.A. and Turner, H.M., 2000. The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of research in science teaching, 37 (9), 963–980.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumper, R., 2006a. Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of science education and technology, 15 (1), 47–58.10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6
   Google Scholar
• Trumper, R., 2006b. Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in biology. Science education international, 17 (1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• van Veen, K., Zwart, R., and Meirink, J., 2011. What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In: M. Kooy and K. van Veen, eds. Teacher learning that matters: international perspectives. London: Routledge, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A., 2008. A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24 (1), 80–91.10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R., 1991. The constructivist learning model. The science teacher, 58 (6), 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K.S., et al., 2007. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007 – No. 033) [online]. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Available from: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/REL_2007033.pdf [Accessed 28 September 2014].
   Google Scholar