Induction program structures as mediating factors for coach influence on novice teacher development

References

• Arbuckle, J.L., 2013. IBM SPSS AMOS 22 Users’ Guide. Amos Development Corporation. IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, K.C. and Marks, J.T., 2017. Connecting teacher preparation to teacher induction. American educational research journal, 54 (2), 360–394. doi:10.3102/0002831217690517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazar, D. and Kraft, M.A., 2015. Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 37 (4), 542–566. doi:10.3102/0162373715579487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett, J. and Knight, J., 2009. Research on coaching. In: Knight, ed. Coaching: approaches and perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 192–216.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., et al., 2009. Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. and Higdon, K., 2008. The effects of mentoring/induction support on beginning teachers’ practices in early elementary classrooms (K-3). Journal of research in childhood education, 22 (3), 261–274. doi:10.1080/02568540809594626
   Google Scholar
• Ehsanipour, T. and Zaccarelli, F.G. (2017). Exploring coaching for powerful technology use in education. Center to Support Excellence in Teaching – Stanford University. Digital Promise. Accessed 1 September 2017: http://digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Dynamic-Learning-Project-Paper-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S., 2001. From Preparation to Practice: designing a Continuum to Strengthen and Sustain Teaching. Teachers College Record, 103 (6), 1013–1055. doi:10.1111/tcre.2001.103.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S., Strong, M., and Villar, A., 2008. An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110 (10), 2271–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. and Weiss, E. (2019). Low relative pay and high incidence of moonlighting play a role in the teacher shortage, particularly in high-poverty schools. Accessed May 14th, 2019 https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/161908.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, L.K. and Cobb, P., 2017. Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of teacher education, 68 (4), 411–425. doi:10.1177/0022487117702579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., et al., 2010. Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, L. (2016). Support from the start: A 50-state review of policies on new educator induction and mentoring. New Teacher Center. Accessed 1 September 2017: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/daa2/d6d3b8e41d60d9cf9752ba7e8bcb577dbb5a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R.M. and Strong, M., 2011. The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81 (2), 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. and Showers, B., 1982. The coaching of teaching. Educational leadership, 40 (1), 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. and Berliner, D.C., 2012. Characteristics of teacher induction programs and turnover rates of beginning teachers. The teacher educator, 47 (4), 268–282. doi:10.1080/08878730.2012.707758
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. and Cornett, J. (2017). Studying the impact of instructional coaching. University of Kansas Center of Research on Teaching. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.A. and Blazar, D., 2016. Individualized coaching to improve teacher practice across grades and subjects: new experimental evidence. Educational policy, 31 (7), 1033–1068. doi:10.1177/0895904816631099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.A., Blazar, D., and Hogan, D., 2018. The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of educational research, 88 (4), 547–588. doi:10.3102/0034654318759268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoCascio, S.J., Smeaton, P.S., and Waters, F.H., 2016. How induction programs affect the decision of alternate route urban teachers to remain teaching. Education and urban society, 48 (2), 103–125. doi:10.1177/0013124513514772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Picucci, A., Center, N.T., Education, S.R.I., Young, V.M., Schmidt, R., Wang, H., Cassidy, L., and Laguarda, K., 2017. A Comprehensive Model of Teacher Induction: Implementation and Impact on Teachers and Students.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M.S., et al., 2015. Mentor policy and the quality of mentoring. The elementary school journal, 116 (1), 76–102. doi:10.1086/683134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M. and McQueen, K., 2017. Does new teacher induction really improve retention? Journal of teacher education, 68 (4), 394–410. doi:10.1177/0022487117702583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M. and Ingersoll, R.M., 2004. What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American educational research journal, 41 (3), 681–714. doi:10.3102/00028312041003681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds., 2010. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “Local Education Agency Universe Survey,” 2016–17. Accessed 24 May 2019b: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey,” 2000-01, 2005-06, 2009-10, and 2010-11. Accessed 24 May 2019a: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_046.asp
   Google Scholar
• Van Zandt Allen, L., 2013. The impact of induction support on teacher development, teacher retention, and the teacher quality issue. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40 (3), 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, M.E., et al., 2010. Examining the effects of new teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S.L. and Rigby, J.G., 2017. Coaching for Coherence: how Instructional Coaches Lead Change in the Evaluation Era. Educational Researcher, 46 (6), 323–328. doi:10.3102/0013189X17725525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar