715
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The participatory dimension of teachers’ self-regulated professional learning about learning design: beliefs versus behaviours

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 340-352 | Received 24 Nov 2019, Accepted 20 May 2020, Published online: 30 Jun 2020

References

  • Anderson, L., 2011. DELILA–Embedding digital and information literacy OERs into the PG Cert. Journal of information literacy, 5 (1), 95–98. doi:10.11645/5.1.1611
  • Asensio-Pérez, J.I., et al., 2017. Towards teaching as design: exploring the interplay between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and teacher professional development. Computers & education, 114, 92–116. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.011
  • Barron, B., 2006. Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: a learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49 (4), 193–224. doi:10.1159/000094368
  • Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., and Lockyer, L., 2015. Technology tools to support learning design: implications derived from an investigation of university teachers’ design practices. Computers & education, 81, 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.016
  • Binkhorst, F., et al., 2015. Understanding teacher design teams–a mixed methods approach to developing a descriptive framework. Teaching and teacher education, 51, 213–224. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.006
  • Bolívar, A. and Bolívar-Ruano, R., 2016. Individualismo y comunidad profesional en los establecimientos escolares en España: limitaciones y posibilidades. Educar em Revista, (62), 181–198. doi:10.1590/0104-4060.47877
  • Bower, M. and Vlachopoulos, P., 2018. A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks. British journal of educational technology, 49 (6), 981–997. doi:10.1111/bjet.12668
  • Burgos, D., et al., 2007. Authoring game-based adaptive units of learning with IMS learning design and e-adventure. International journal of learning technology, 3 (3), 252–268. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2007.015444
  • Celik, D. and Magoulas, G., 2016. Teachers’ perspectives on design for learning using computer based information systems: a systematic literature review. In: Conference Proceedings-UKAIS. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
  • Conole, G., 2012. Designing for learning in an open world. Vol. 4. Berlin, DE: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Conole, G. and Wills, S., 2013. Representing learning designs–making design explicit and shareable. Educational media international, 50 (1), 24–38. doi:10.1080/09523987.2013.777184
  • Dabbagh, N. and Kitsantas, A., 2012. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The internet and higher education, 15 (1), 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • Dagnino, F.M., et al., 2018. Exploring teachers’ needs and the existing barriers to the adoption of Learning Design methods and tools: a literature survey. british journal of educational technology, 49 (6), 998–1013. doi:10.1111/bjet.12695
  • Dalziel, J., 2008. Learning design: sharing pedagogical know-how. In: T. Iiyoshi & M. S. V. Kumar, eds. Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press, pp. 375–387.
  • Dalziel, J., et al., 2016. The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of interactive media in education, 7, 1–24.
  • Desimone, L., Smith, T.M., and Phillips, K., 2013. Linking student achievement growth to professional development participation and changes in instruction: a longitudinal study of elementary students and teachers in Title I schools. Teachers College record, 115 (5), 1–46.
  • Dettori, G., Giannetti, T., and Persico, D., 2005. Communities of practice, virtual learning communities and self-regulated learning. In: K. Steffens, R. Carneiro, and J. Underwood, eds. Proceedings of the TACONET conference. Aachen, DE: Shaker Verlag, 126–133.
  • Dick, W. and Carey, L., 1996. The systematic design of instruction. 4th. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • Dogan, S., Pringle, R., and Mesa, J., 2016. The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: a review. Professional development in education, 42 (4), 569–588. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
  • Ermeling, B.A., 2010. Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on classroom practice. Teaching and teacher education, 26 (3), 377–388. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.019
  • Eurydice, 2017. The teaching profession in Europe [online]. Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/36bde79d-6351-489a-9986-d019efb2e72c/language-en Accessed 13 November 2019
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M., 2015. Professional capital: transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY, US: Teachers College Press.
  • Hargreaves, A. and O’Connor, M.T., 2018. Collaborative professionalism: when teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Corwin Press.
  • Hargreaves, D.H., 1994. The new professionalism: the synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and teacher education, 10 (4), 423–438. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)90023-X
  • Hernández-Leo, D., et al., 2018. An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5, 9. doi:10.3389/fict.2018.00009
  • Hernández-Leo, D., et al., 2006. Collage, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Journal of educational technology and society, 9 (1), 58–71.
  • Hummel, H., et al., 2004. Educational modelling language and learning design: new opportunities for instructional reusability and personalised learning. International journal of learning technology, 1 (1), 111–126. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2004.003685
  • Jackson, N.J., 2013. The concept of learning ecologies. In: N.J. Jackson, ed. Lifewide learning, education and personal development [online]. Available from: http://www.normanjackson.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/chapter_a5.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2019].
  • Jenkins, H., 2009. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
  • Kaatrakoski, H., Littlejohn, A., and Hood, N., 2017. Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within open educational practice. Higher education, 74 (4), 599–615. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
  • Kali, Y., Goodyear, P., and Markauskaite, L., 2011. Researching design practices and design cognition: contexts, experiences and pedagogical knowledge‐in‐pieces. Learning, media and technology, 36 (2), 129–149. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.553621
  • Kali, Y., et al., 2018. Supporting outdoor inquiry learning (SOIL): teachers as designers of mobile‐assisted seamless learning. British journal of educational technology, 49 (6), 1145–1161. doi:10.1111/bjet.12698
  • Kirschner, P.A., 2015. Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional science, 43 (2), 309–322. doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
  • Kuiper, R.A. and Pesut, D.J., 2004. Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self‐regulated learning theory. Journal of advanced nursing, 45 (4), 381–391. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x
  • Laurillard, D., 2012. Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Laurillard, D., et al., 2018. Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49 (6), 1044–1058. doi:10.1111/bjet.12697
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge university press.
  • Little, J.W., 2002. Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and teacher education, 18 (8), 917–946. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
  • Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., and Margaryan, A., 2012. Charting collective knowledge: supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace. Journal of workplace learning, 24 (3), 226–238. doi:10.1108/13665621211209285
  • Masterman, E. and Manton, M., 2011. Teachers’ perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design. Technology, pedagogy and education, 20 (2), 227–246. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2011.588414
  • Merrill, M.D., 2012. First principles of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Michos, K. and Hernández-Leo, D., 2018. Supporting awareness in communities of learning design practice. Computers in human behavior, 85, 255–270. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.008
  • Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., and Margaryan, A., 2014. Workplace learning in informal networks. In: Reusing open resources. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 115–125.
  • Molina, A.I., et al., 2018. Learn‐CIAN: a visual language for the modelling of group learning processes. British journal of educational technology, 49 (6), 1096–1112. doi:10.1111/bjet.12680
  • Montero-Mesa, L. and Gewerc, A., 2018. La profesión docente en la sociedad del conocimiento. Una mirada a través de la revisión de investigaciones de los últimos 10 años. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 56. doi:10.6018/red/56/3.
  • Mor, Y. and Craft, B., 2012. Learning design: reflections on a snapshot of the current landscape. Research in learning technology, 20, 85–94. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
  • Oliver, M., et al., 2018. Sharing teacher knowledge at scale: teacher inquiry, learning design and the representation of teachers’ practice. Teacher development, 22 (4), 587–606. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1381642
  • Panadero, E., 2017. A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 422. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  • Persico, D., 1997. Methodological constants in courseware design. British journal of educational technology, 28 (2), 111–123. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00015
  • Persico, D., Manganello, F., and Passarelli, M., in press. Participatory approaches to learning design: the gap between theory and practice. Interaction design & architecture(s), 44.
  • Persico, D., Milligan, C., and Littlejohn, A., 2015. The interplay between self-regulated professional learning and teachers’ work-practice. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 191, 2481–2486. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.590
  • Persico, D. and Pozzi, F., 2013. The role of representations for the development of a participatory culture of Learning Design among educators. In: D. Parmigiani, V. Pennazio, and A. Traverso, eds. ATEE-SIREM winter conference proceedings, learning & teaching with media & technology. 7–9/3/2013, Genoa, Italy. Brussels, BE: ATEE AISBL, 365–372.
  • Persico, D. and Pozzi, F., 2015. Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British journal of educational technology, 46 (2), 230–248. doi:10.1111/bjet.12207
  • Persico, D., et al., 2013. Learning design Rashomon I–supporting the design of one lesson through different approaches. Research in Learning Technology, 21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20224.
  • Persico, D., Pozzi, F., and Goodyear, P., 2018. Teachers as designers of TEL interventions. British journal of educational technology, 49 (6), 975–980. doi:10.1111/bjet.12706
  • Pintrich, P.R., 2000. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, eds. Handbook of self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 451–502.
  • Pintrich, P.R. and De Groot, E.V., 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82 (1), 33. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Prenger, R., Poortman, C.L., and Handelzalts, A., 2018. The effects of networked professional learning communities. Journal of teacher education, 70 (5), 441–452. 0022487117753574.
  • Prieto, L.P., et al., 2013. Learning design Rashomon II: exploring one lesson through multiple tools. Research in learning technology supplement, 2013 (21: 20057), 20.
  • Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., and Raz-Fogel, N., 2006, June. Adopt & adapt: structuring, sharing and reusing asynchronous collaborative pedagogy. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 599–605.
  • Sacristán, J.G., et al., 2010. Saberes e incertidumbres sobre el currículum. Madrid, ES: Ediciones Morata.
  • Sangrá, A., Raffaghelli, J.E., and Guitert‐Catasús, M., 2019. Learning ecologies through a lens: ontological, methodological and applicative issues. a systematic review of the literature. British journal of educational technology, 50 (4), 1619–1638. doi:10.1111/bjet.12795
  • Schaap, H., et al., 2019. Tensions experienced by teachers when participating in a professional learning community. Professional development in education, 45 (5), 814–831. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1547781
  • Schlager, M.S. and Fusco, J., 2003. Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: are we putting the cart before the horse? The information society, 19 (3), 203–220. doi:10.1080/01972240309464
  • Trust, T., Carpenter, J.P., and Krutka, D.G., 2017. Moving beyond silos: professional learning networks in higher education. The internet and higher education, 35, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001
  • Trust, T., Krutka, D.G., and Carpenter, J.P., 2016. “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & education, 102, 15–34. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
  • Van den Beemt, A. and Diepstraten, I., 2016. Teacher perspectives on ICT: a learning ecology approach. Computers & education, 92-93, 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.017
  • Wexler, L.J., 2020. ‘I would be a completely different teacher if I had been with a different mentor’: ways in which educative mentoring matters as novices learn to teach. Professional development in education, 46 (2), 211–228. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1573375
  • Williams, R., Karousou, R., and Mackness, J., 2011. Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International review of research in open and distributed learning, 12 (3), 39–59. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883
  • Winters, N. and Mor, Y., 2008. IDR: a participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers & education, 50 (2), 579–600. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.015
  • Zimmerman, B.J. and Schunk, D.H., eds., 2001. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.