5,070
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meeting Report

Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use

, , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 742-755 | Received 18 Jan 2017, Accepted 25 Apr 2017, Published online: 26 Jun 2017

References

  • Mullard A. 2015 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15(2):73–6; PMID:26837582; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.15
  • EMA. European public assessment reports, human medicines [Internet]. The European Medicines Agency [cited 2016 October 19]. 2016 Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl = pages%2Fmedicines%2Flanding%2Fepar_search.jsp&mid=&searchTab = searchByAuthType&alreadyLoaded = true&isNewQuery = true&status = Authorised&keyword = Enter+keywords&searchType = name&taxonomyPath=&treeNumber=&searchGenericType = biosimilars&genericsKeywordSearch=Submit.
  • FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm 2016.
  • EMA. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Press_release/2013/06/WC500144941.pdf. 2013.
  • FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Press Release. 6 March 2015: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm436648.htm. 2015.
  • FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Press Release. 5 April 2016: http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm494227.htm. 2016.
  • Buckley LA, Chapman K, Burns-Naas LA, Todd MD, Martin PL, Lansita JA. Considerations regarding nonhuman primate use in safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals. Int J Toxicol 2011; 30(5):583-90; PMID:22013138; https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581811415875
  • Bussiere JL. Species selection considerations for preclinical toxicology studies for biotherapeutics. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 4(7):871-7; PMID:18624676; https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.7.871
  • Chapman K, Pullen N, Coney L, Dempster M, Andrews L, Bajramovic J, Baldrick P, Buckley L, Jacobs A, Hale G, et al. Preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies: Considerations for the use of non-human primates. MAbs 2009; 1(5):505-16; PMID:20065651; https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.1.5.9676
  • Chapman K, Pullen N, Graham M, Ragan I. Preclinical safety testing of monoclonal antibodies: The significance of species relevance. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007; 6(2):120-6; PMID:17268483; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2242
  • Chapman KL, Andrews L, Bajramovic JJ, Baldrick P, Black LE, Bowman CJ, Buckley LA, Coney LA, Couch J, Maggie Dempster A, et al. The design of chronic toxicology studies of monoclonal antibodies: Implications for the reduction in use of non-human primates. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2012; 62(2):347-54; PMID:22100994; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.016
  • Brennan FR, Cavagnaro J, McKeever K, Schutten M, Vahle J, Weinbauer G, Black L. Safety testing of monoclonal antibodies in non-human primates: Case studies highlighting their impact on risk assessment for humans. Ready for submission. 2017.
  • Judson R, Kavlock R, Martin M, Reif D, Houck K, Knudsen T, Richard A, Tice RR, Whelan M, Xia M, et al. Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing. ALTEX 2013; 30(1):51-6; PMID:23338806; https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2013.1.051
  • https://aopwiki.org.
  • NIH. http://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-darpa-fda-collaborate-develop-cutting-edge-technologies-predict-drug-safety. 2011.
  • Emulate. https://emulatebio.com/press/fda-collab-agreement-emulate/. 2017.
  • van Meer PJ, Kooijman M, Brinks V, Gispen-de Wied CC, Silva-Lima B, Moors EH, Schellekens H. Immunogenicity of mAbs in non-human primates during nonclinical safety assessment. MAbs 2013; 5(5):810-6; PMID:23924803; https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.25234
  • van Meer PJ, Kooijman M, van der Laan JW, Moors EH, Schellekens H. The value of non-human primates in the development of monoclonal antibodies. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31(10):882-3; PMID:24104750; https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2709
  • DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ 2016; 47:20-33; PMID:26928437; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012
  • Scannell JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012; 11(3):191-200; PMID:22378269; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3681
  • Schulze U, Baedeker M, Chen YT, Greber D. R&D productivity: On the comeback trail. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014; 13(5):331-2; PMID:24751818; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4320
  • Kizhedath A, Wilkinson S, Glassey J. Glassey, applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: Status Quo and scope. Arch Toxicol 2017; 91(4):1595-612; PMID:27766364; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1876-7
  • http://www.vaxdesign.com/mimic-technology.
  • http://www.stemina.com.
  • Bhatia SN, Ingber DE. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32(8):760-72; PMID:25093883; https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2989
  • Borenstein JT. Organs-on-Chips: How microsystems technology can transform the drug development process. IEEE Pulse 2016; 7(2):22-6; PMID:26978847; https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2015.2513722
  • Jones HM, Chen Y, Gibson C, Heimbach T, Parrott N, Peters SA, Snoeys J, Upreti VV, Zheng M, Hall SD. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in drug discovery and development: A pharmaceutical industry perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015; 97(3):247-62; PMID:25670209; https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.37
  • Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M, Raunio H. in vivo-in vitro-in silico pharmacokinetic modelling in drug development: Current status and future directions. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011; 50(8):483-91; PMID:21740072; https://doi.org/10.2165/11592400-000000000-00000
  • Valerio LG Jr. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009; 241(3):356-70; PMID:19716836; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.022
  • Joubert MK, Deshpande M, Yang J, Reynolds H, Bryson C, Fogg M, Baker MP, Herskovitz J, Goletz TJ, Zhou L, et al. Use of in vitro assays to assess immunogenicity risk of antibody-based biotherapeutics. PLoS One 2016; 11(8):e0159328; PMID:27494246; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159328
  • Joubert MK, Hokom M, Eakin C, Zhou L, Deshpande M, Baker M, Goletz T, Kerwin B, Chirmule N, Narhi L, et al. Highly aggregated antibody therapeutics can enhance the in vitro innate and late-stage T-cell immune responses. J Biol Chem 2012 Jul 20; 287(30):25266-79; PMID:22584577; https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.330902
  • McCulloch DR, Le Goff C, Bhatt S, Dixon LJ, Sandy JD, Apte SS. Adamts5, the gene encoding a proteoglycan-degrading metalloprotease, is expressed by specific cell lineages during mouse embryonic development and in adult tissues. Gene Expr Patterns 2009; 9(5):314-23; PMID:19250981; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gep.2009.02.006
  • Dupuis LE, McCulloch DR, McGarity JD, Bahan A, Wessels A, Weber D, Diminich AM, Nelson CM, Apte SS, Kern CB. Altered versican cleavage in ADAMTS5 deficient mice; a novel etiology of myxomatous valve disease. Dev Biol 2011; 357(1):152-64; PMID:21749862; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.041
  • Phng LK, Gerhardt H. Angiogenesis: A team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell 2009; 16(2):196-208; PMID:19217422; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015
  • Liu Z, Turkoz A, Jackson EN, Corbo JC, Engelbach JA, Garbow JR, Piwnica-Worms DR, Kopan R. Notch1 loss of heterozygosity causes vascular tumors and lethal hemorrhage in mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121(2):800-8; PMID:21266774; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43114
  • Hoey T, Yen WC, Axelrod F, Basi J, Donigian L, Dylla S, Fitch-Bruhns M, Lazetic S, Park IK, Sato A, et al. DLL4 blockade inhibits tumor growth and reduces tumor-initiating cell frequency. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 5(2):168-77; PMID:19664991; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.019
  • Noguera-Troise I, Daly C, Papadopoulos NJ, Coetzee S, Boland P, Gale NW, Lin HC, Yancopoulos GD, Thurston G. Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature 2006; 444(7122):1032-7; PMID:17183313; https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05355
  • Ridgway J, Zhang G, Wu Y, Stawicki S, Liang WC, Chanthery Y, Kowalski J, Watts RJ, Callahan C, Kasman I, et al. Inhibition of Dll4 signalling inhibits tumour growth by deregulating angiogenesis. Nature 2006; 444(7122):1083-7; PMID:17183323; https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05313
  • Scehnet JS, Jiang W, Kumar SR, Krasnoperov V, Trindade A, Benedito R, Djokovic D, Borges C, Ley EJ, Duarte A, et al. Inhibition of Dll4-mediated signaling induces proliferation of immature vessels and results in poor tissue perfusion. Blood 2007; 109(11):4753-60; PMID:17311993; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-12-063933
  • Couch JA, Zhang G, Beyer JC, de Zafra CL, Gupta P, Kamath AV, Lewin-Koh N, Tarrant J, Allamneni KP, Cain G, et al. Balancing efficacy and safety of an anti-DLL4 antibody through pharmacokinetic modulation. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22(6):1469-79; PMID:26589434; https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1380
  • ICH. Preclincal safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Topic S6(R1). June 2011; S6(R1).
  • Sistare FD, Mattes WB, LeCluyse EL. The promise of new technologies to reduce, refine, or replace animal use while reducing risks of drug induced liver injury in pharmaceutical development. ILAR J6 2016; 57(2):186-211; PMID:28053072; https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilw025
  • Barghorn S. Off target toxicity of an anti-amyloid beta antibody for Alzheimer's disease immunotherapy. Presented at IBC's Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics conference December 2013.
  • Vugmeyster Y, Szklut P, Wensel D, Ross J, Xu X, Awwad M, Gill D, Tchistiakov L, Warner G. Complex pharmacokinetics of a humanized antibody against human amyloid beta peptide, anti-abeta Ab2, in nonclinical species. Pharm Res 2011; 28:1696-706. 45; PMID:21424161; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0405-x
  • ICH. Final concept paper S11: Nonclinical safety testing in support of development of pediatric medicines. International Council on Harmonisation (ICH). Topic S11. September 2014. Endorsed by the ICH Steering Committee on 10 November 2014., S11.
  • Clarke J, Hurst C, Martin P, Vahle J, Ponce R, Mounho B, Heidel S, Andrews L, Reynolds T, Cavagnaro J. Duration of chronic toxicity studies for biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals: Is 6 months still appropriate? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2008; 50(1):2-22; PMID:17998153; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.08.001
  • ICH. Nonclinical evaluation for anticancer pharmaceuticals. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Topic S9. March 2010; S9.