Conceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences: Aims, methods, and barriers to reintegration

References

• Altier, M. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., & Horgan, J. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology and criminology. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 647–661. doi: 10.1177/0022343314535946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. (2014). The terrorism acts in 2013: Report of the independent reviewer on the operation of the terrorism act 2000 and part 1 of the terrorism act 2006. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd Ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Ashour, O. (2007). Lions tamed? An inquiry into the causes of de-radicalization of armed Islamist movements: The case of the Egyptian Islamic group. Middle East Journal, 61, 596–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashour, O. (2009). The deradicalization of jihadists: Transforming armed Islamist movements. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bjelopero, J. (2014). Countering violent extremism in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørgo, T. (2011). Dreams and disillusionment: Engagement in and disengagement from militant extremist groups. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(4), 277–285. doi: 10.1007/s10611-011-9282-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørgo, T., & Horgan, J. (2009). Introduction. In T. Bjørgo & J. Horgan (Eds.), Leaving terrorism behind: Individual and collective disengagement (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Dean, G. (2014). Neurocognitive risk assessment for the early detection of violent extremists. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dechesne, M. (2011). Deradicalization: Not soft, but strategic. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(4), 287–292. doi: 10.1007/s10611-011-9283-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, L., & Adler, J. R. (2010). The challenge of managing prejudice and hate in offending behaviours. In J.R. Adler & J.M. Gray (Eds.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates and practices (pp. 423–442). Padstow: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., Horgan, J., & Deckert, P. (2014). Bombing alone: Tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(2), 425–435. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, P., & Young, J. (2011). Comparing role-specific terrorist profiles. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1782008
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2014). Operation of police powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and subsequent legislation: Arrests, outcomes and stop and searches, Great Britain, financial year ending March 2014: Data tables. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/operation-of-police-powers-under-the-terrorism-act-2000-data-tables-financial-year-ending-march-2014
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J. (2008). Deradicalization and disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation. Perspectives on Terrorism, 2(4), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. Padstow: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., & Altier, M. B. (2012). The future of terrorist deradicalization programs. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Summer/Fall, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists? Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291. doi: 10.1080/09546551003594748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., & Taylor, M. (2011). Disengagement, de-radicalization, and the arc of terrorism: Future directions for research. In R. Coolsaet (Ed.), Jihadi terrorism and the radicalisation challenge: European and American experiences (pp. 173–186). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., LeBel, T., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(3), 271–281. doi: 10.1080/10683160410001662762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisenhelder, T. (1982). Becoming normal: Certification as a stage in exiting from crime. Deviant Behaviour: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 137–153. doi: 10.1080/01639625.1982.9967580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. (2012). The individual risk assessment of terrorism. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 18(2), 167–205. doi: 10.1037/a0025792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parole Board for England and Wales, (2010). Annual report and accounts 2009/10. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L. (2010). Rehabilitating violent offenders. In J. Brown & E. A. Campbell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 441–452). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, D. E. (2009). Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism 2009–02. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/2009–02-rdv-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Counter Terrorism Implementation Task Force. (2008). First Report of the Working Group on Radicalisation and Extremism that Lead to Terrorism: Inventory of State Programmes. Retrieved 4 March, 2011, from http://www.un.org/terrorism/pdfs/radicalization.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vertigans, S. (2009). Militant Islam: A sociology of characteristics, causes and consequences. Chippenham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, R., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. Padstow: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J., & Kleinman, S. M. (2014). A utilization-focused guide for conducting terrorism risk reduction program evaluations. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 6(2), 102–146. doi: 10.1080/19434472.2013.860183
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J., & Lindsey, S. C. (2014). A social psychological critique of the Saudi terrorism risk reduction initiatives. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(2), 135–151. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2012.749474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar