The terror of ‘terrorists’: an investigation in experimental applied ethics

References

• Adams, F. (1986). Intention and intentional action: The simple view. Mind and Language, 1, 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. (2007). Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2, 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Allhoff, F. (2012). Terrorism, ticking time-bombs and torture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allhoff, F., & Cohen, E. D. (2003). Terrorism and torture. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 17, 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Allhoff, F., & Cohen, E. D. (2005). A defense of torture: Separation of cases, ticking time-bombs, and moral justification. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19, 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 147–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, J., & Buckwalter, W. (2010). The epistemic side-effect effect. Mind & Language, 25, 474–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1988). The culture of terrorism. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, C. A. J. (1985). The morality of terrorism. Philosophy, 60, 47–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Adaptive variation in judgment and philosophical intuition. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 355–357.
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2011). Virtue in business: Morally better, praiseworthy, trustworthy, and more satisfying. Journal of Organizatoinal Moral Psychology, 2, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (in press). Expert intuition. In L. M. Osbeck & B. S. Held (Eds.), Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M., & Gilchrist, A. H. (2006). Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 991–997.
   Google Scholar
• Combs, C. C. (1997). Terrorism in the twenty-first century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., McElroy, T., & Black, C (2010). Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 110–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M. (2000). The psychology of terrorism: An agenda for the 21st century. Political Psychology, 21, 405–420. doi:10.1111/0162–895X.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., & Mele, A. (2008). Intentional action: Two-and-a-half folk concepts?. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 171–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. (1976). The relationship between public opinion and state policy: A new look based on some forgotten data. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85, 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A. (2009). Experimental philosophy. Analyse & Kritik, 31, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A. (2013). Pereboom and premises: Asking the right questions in the experimental philosophy of free will. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are?: Personality differences intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 342–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Individual differences in theory-of-mind judgments: Order effects and side effects. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). The virtues of ignorance. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 335–350.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz. A., & Cokely, E. T. (2013a). Virtue or consequences: The folk against Pure Evaluational Internalism. Philosophical Psychology, 26, 702–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2013b). Predicting philosophical disagreement. Philosophy Compass, 8/10, 978–989.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Cokely, E. T., & Nadelhoffer, T. (2009). Natural compatibilism v. natural incompatibilism: Back to the drawing board. Mind & Language, 24, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Harris, M., & Perez, A. (2012). Perspective in intentional action attribution. Philosophical Psychology, 25, 673–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Millan, M. (in press). An error theory for compatibilist intuitions. Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.865513
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Perez, A., & Harris, M. (2012). Free will, causes, and decisions: Individual differences in written reports. The Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19, 166–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., & Zarpentine, C. (2010). Do you know more when it matters less? Philosophical Psychology, 23, 683–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (1978). The problem of abortion and the Doctrine of double effect in virtues and vices. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychological Science, 15, 286–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014). Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 270–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 392–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S., Rentfrow, P., & Swann, W. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1974). Living on a lifeboat. Bioscience, 24, 561–568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huebner, B., Bruno, M., & Sarkissian, H. (2010). What does the nation of China think about phenomenal states? European Review of Philosophy 1, 225–243.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, T. J., & Sligo, J. (1971). An empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defense of conceptual analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counterterrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 461–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice – mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapitan, T. (2004). ‘Terrorism’ as a method of terrorism. In G. Meggle (Ed.), Ethics of terrorism and counter-terrorism (pp. 21–37). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kerbel, M. R. (2000). If it bleeds, it leads: An anatomy of television news. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khatchadourian, H. (1998). The morality of terrorism. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2003a). Intentional action and side-effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2003b). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2004a). Folk psychology and folk morality: Response to critics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24, 270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2004b). Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis, 64, 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130, 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (2008). An experimental philosophy manifesto. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., Crenshaw, M., Post, J. M., & Victoroff, J. (2007). What should this fight be called?. Metaphors of counterterrorism and their implications. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(3), 97–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Fishman, S. (2009). Psychological factors in terrorism and counterterrorism: Individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3, 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Gonzales, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risk of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2006). The construction of preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92, B1–B12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Hull, J., & Zimmerman, A. (2010). Practical interests, relevant alternatives, and knowledge attributions: An empirical study. European Review of Philosophy, 1, 265–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCann, H. J. (1986). Rationality and the range of intention. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10, 191–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, H. (2005). Intentional action and intending: Recent empirical studies. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 737–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, A. (2003). Intentional action: Controversies, data, and core hypotheses. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, A. R., & Cushman, F. (2007). Intentional action, folk judgments, and stories: Sorting things out. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 184–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, A., & Sverdlik, S. (1996). Intention, intentional action, and moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 82, 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T. (2004). Blame, badness, and intentional action: A reply to Knobe and Mendlow. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24, 259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T. (2005). Skill, luck, control, and intentional action. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T. (2006). On trying to save the simple view. Mind and Language, 21, 565–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T., & Nahmias, E. (2007). The past and future of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10, 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Sugden, S. J. B. (2002). How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral?. The Monist, 85, 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Folds-Bennett, T. (2003). Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgment about moral and response-dependent properties. Cognition, 90, B23–B32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuition. Nous, 41, 663–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Ulatowski, J. (2007). Intuitions and individual differences: The Knobe effect revisited. Mind & Language, 22, 346–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, C. S. & Pfefferbaum, B. (2002). Research on the mental health effects of terrorism. JAMA, 288, 633–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orehek, E., Dossje, B., Kruglanski, A. W., Cole, A., Saddler, T., & Jackson, J. (2010). Need for closure and the social response to terrorism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Kennedy, K., & Butsch, S. (2006). Bombing versus negotiating: How preferences for combating terrorism are affected by perceived terrorist rationality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiff, M., Dancy, M., Costa, V., & Gert, J. (2008). Terrorism, retribution, and collective responsibility. Social Theory and Practice, 34, 209–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rencher, A. C., & Scott, D. T. (1990). Assessing the contribution of individual variables following rejection of a multivariate hypothesis. Communication in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 19, 535–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, D. (2004). Terrorism with intention. Ethics, 114, 752–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. (2006). Is terrorism morally distinctive? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, E., Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2011). Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the Expertise Defense. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1722–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. H. (2008). Terrorism, shared rules, and trust. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 16, 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, S., Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2008). The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on truetemp. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 138–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sytsma, J., & Machery, E. (2009). How to study folk intuitions about phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Environments that make us smart: Ecological rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 167–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., Stich, S., & Minar, E. (2001). Normativity and Epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29, 429–460.
   Google Scholar