Policy vs reality: comparing the policies of social media sites and users’ experiences, in the context of exposure to extremist content

References

• Agarwal, S., & Sureka, A. (2015). Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Internet Technology, 8956(1), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14977-6_47
   Google Scholar
• Aistrope, T. (2016). Social media and counterterrorism strategy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1113230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastug, M. F., Douai, A., & Akca, D. (2020). Exploring the ‘demand side’ of online radicalization: Evidence from the Canadian context. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1494409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R. A. (2012). Dancing with wolves: Today’s lone W s lone wolf terrorists. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 4(1), 1–14. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1023&context=jpps
   Google Scholar
• Baugut, P., & Neumann, K. (2020). Online propaganda use during Islamist radicalization. Information. Communication & Society, 23(11), 1570–1592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1594333
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, J. J., Nisa, C. F., Schumpe, B. M., Gurmu, T., Williams, M. J., & Putra, I. E. (2020). Do counter-narratives reduce support for ISIS? Yes, but not for their target audience. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1059), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borelli, M. (2021). Social media corporations as actors of counter-terrorism. New Media & Society, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211035121
   Google Scholar
• Bouko, C., Naderer, B., Rieger, D., Ostaeyen, P. V., & Voue, P. (2022). Discourse patterns used by extremist Salafists on Facebook: Identifying potential triggers to cognitive biases in radicalized content. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(3), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1879185
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, N., & Alathur, S. (2018). Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Elgot, J., & Dodd, V. (2022, May 16). Leaked Prevent review attacks ‘double standards’ on far right and Islamists. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/may/16/leaked-prevent-review-attacks-double-standards-on-rightwingers-and-islamists
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, F., Donne, J. D., & Knop, J. (2021). The use of social media in intelligence and its impact on police work. In J. J. Nolan, F. Crispino, & T. Parsons (Eds.), Policing in an Age of Reform (pp. 213–231). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56765-1_13
   Google Scholar
• Gerstendfeld, P. B., Grant, D. R., & Chiang, C. P. (2003). Hate online: A content analysis of extremist internet sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x
   Google Scholar
• Global WebIndex. (2022). The biggest social media trends for 2022. Global WebIndex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/social
   Google Scholar
• Google. (n.d.). YouTube community guidelines enforcement. Google. https://transparencyreport.google.com/youtube-policy/removals?hl=en
   Google Scholar
• Grover, T., & Mark, G. (2019). Detecting potential warning behaviors of ideological radicalization in an alt-right subreddit. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(1), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3221
   Google Scholar
• Grygiel, J., & Brown, N. (2019). Are social media companies motivated to be good corporate citizens? Examination of the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety. Telecommunications Policy, 43(5), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, ME. (2021). We make mistakes: Twitter’s embrace of the extreme far right. Southern Poverty Law Centre. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2021/07/07/we-make-mistakes-twitters-embrace-extreme-far-right
   Google Scholar
• HM Govermment. (2015). Counter-extremism strategy (Cm. 9148). Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-extremism-strategy
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2021). Revised prevent duty guidance: For England and Wales. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance/revised-prevent-duty-guidance-for-england-and-wales#:~:text=The%20Prevent%20strategy%2C%20published%20by,becoming%20terrorists%20or%20supporting%20terrorism
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja, A. S., & Khan, A. H. (2016). Media strategy of ISIS: An analysis. Strategic Studies, 36(2), 104–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48535950
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, I., Turner, C., & Rowan, C. (2022, April 11). Prevent is ‘failing’, say terror experts after murderer Ali Harbi Ali deceived officials. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/11/prevent-failing-say-terror-experts-murderer-ali-harbi-ali-deceived/
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., Correia, S. G., & Watkin, A. L. (2019). Regulating terrorist content on social media: automation and the rule of law. International Journal of Law in Context, 15(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000119
   Google Scholar
• Meta. (2022). Community standards enforcement report. Meta. https://transparency.fb.com/data/community-standards-enforcement/
   Google Scholar
• Meta. (n.d.). Hate speech policy details. Meta. https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/policies/community-standards/hate-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Molla, R. (2021, March 1). Posting less, posting more, and tired of it all: How the pandemic has changed social media. Vox. https://www.vox.com/recode/22295131/social-media-use-pandemic-covid-19-instagram-tiktok
   Google Scholar
• Mulcair, C. (2022). Censorship online and hate speech: The case of Reddit. The Mantle. https://www.themantle.com/international-affairs/censorship-online-and-hate-speech-case-reddit
   Google Scholar
• Osaherumwen, S. (2017). International terrorism: The influence of social media in perspective. World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(10), 86–91. https://wwjmrd.com/upload/1509043009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parker, T., & Sitter, N. (2016). The four horsemen of terrorism: It’s not waves, it’s strains. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2015.1112277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phadke, S., & Mitra, T. (2020). Many faced hate: A cross platform study of content framing and information sharing by online hate groups. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376456
   Google Scholar
• Scrivens, R. (2021). Exploring radical right-wing posting behaviors online. Deviant Behavior, 42(11), 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1756391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, M. (2019, August 7). How big tech and policymakers miss the mark when fighting online extremism. TechTank. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2019/08/07/how-big-tech-and-policymakers-miss-the-mark-when-fighting-online-extremism/
   Google Scholar
• The White House. (n.d.). The constitution. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-constitution/
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, P., & Kainga, V. (2022). How social media influence crime. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 4(2), 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360540601_How_Social_Media_Influence_Crime
   Google Scholar
• Tsesis, A. (2017). Social media accountability for terrorist propaganda. Fordham Law Review, 86(2), 605–632. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/flr86&id=623&collection=journals&index=
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (n.d.). The Twitter rules. Twitter Help Center. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules#:~:text=Violence%3A%20You%20may%20not%20threaten,and%20glorification%20of%20violence%20policies
   Google Scholar
• Vocabulary.com. (n.d.). Ideology. Vocabulary.com. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/ideology#:~:text=An%20ideology%20is%20a%20set,socialism%2C%20and%20Marxism%20are%20ideologies
   Google Scholar
• Weimann, G., & Masri, N. (2020). Research note: Spreading hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1780027
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. J. V., & Tzani, C. (2022). How does language influence the radicalisation process? A systematic review of research exploring online extremist communication and discussion. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2022.2104910
   Google Scholar
• Yar, M. (2018). A failure to regulate? The demands and dilemmas of tackling illegal content and behaviour on social media. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.52306/01010318RVZE9940
   Google Scholar