EU marker polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food supplements: analytical approach and occurrence

References

• Bees for Development. © 2014. Monmouth (UK); [ cited 2014 Nov 15]. Available from: http://www.beesfordevelopment.org/what-we-do/information-and-education/info/category/67-propolis.
   Google Scholar
• [BELAC] Belgian Accreditation Body. 2013. Accreditation Certificate 268-TEST. [ cited 2014 Dec 15]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/BELAC%20Annex%20to%20268-TEST.pdf?search.
   Google Scholar
• [COM] Commission of the European Communities. 2008. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the use of substances other than vitamins and minerals in food supplements. Brussels: COM; p. 824.
   Google Scholar
• Danyi S, Brose F, Brasseur C, Schneider Y-J, Larondelle Y, Pussemier L, Robbens J, De Saeger S, Maghuin-Rogister G, Scippo M-L. 2009. Analysis of EU priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food supplements using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to an ultraviolet, diode array or fluorescence detector. Anal Chim Acta. 633:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2002. Commission decision 2002/657/EC of 12 Autust 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Union. L221:8.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2005. Commission Regulation (EC) No 208/2005 of 4 February 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 as regards polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Off J Eur Union. L34:3.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2006. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. L364:5.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1170/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of council and Regulation (EC) no 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the lists of vitamin and minerals and their forms that can be added to foods, including food supplements. Off J Eur Union. L314:36.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2008. Scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the European Commission on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food. EFSA Journal. 724:1–114.
   Google Scholar
• [EU] European Union. 2011a. Commission Regulation (EU) No 835/2011 of 19 August 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. L214:5.
   Google Scholar
• [EU] European Union. 2011b. Commission Regulation (EU) No 836/2011 of 19 August 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 layig down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. L215:9.
   Google Scholar
• [FSA] Food Standard Agency. 2005. PAHs in dietary supplements. Food Survey Inforamtion Sheet 86/05. Available from: http://tna.europarchive.org/20110116113217/http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/fsis8605.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ruiz J, Wenzl T. 2009. Evaluation of gas chromatography columns for the analysis of the 15 + 1 EU-priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Anal Bioanal Chem. 393:1697–1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey RG. 1997. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. New York (NY): Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Howsam M, Jones K. 1998. Sources of PAHs in the environment. In: Neilson A, editor. PAHs and related compounds. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; p. 137–174.
   Google Scholar
• [IARC] International Agency for Research on Cancer. © 2014. Lyon (France); [ cited 2014 Nov 19]. Availabel from: http://www.iarc.fr/.
   Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Organisation for Standardization. 2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2005. [ cited 2014 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm
   Google Scholar
• Khan S, Aijun L, Zhang S, Hu Q, Zhu Y-G. 2008. Accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals in lettuce grown in the soils contaminated with long-term wastewater irrigation. J Hazard Mater. 152:506–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martena MJ, Grutters MMP, De Groot HN, Konings EJM, Rietjens IMCM. 2011. Monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in food supplements containing botanicals and other ingredients on the Dutch market. Food Addit Contam: Part A. 28:925–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret S, Conte LS. 2000. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in edible fats and oils: occurrence and analytical methods. J Chrom A. 882:245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret S, Purcaro G, Conte LS. 2010. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) levels in propolis and propolis-based dietary supplements from the Italian market. Food Chem. 122:333–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poster DL, Schantz MM, Sander LC, Wise SA. 2006. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental samples: a critical review of gas chromatographic (GC) methods. Anal Bioanal Chem. 386:859–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalhosa MJ, Paíga P, Morais S, Ramos S, Delerue-Matos C, Oliveira MBPP. 2012. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in three pelagic fish species from Atlantic Ocean: inter-specific and inter-season comparisons and assessment of potential public health risks. Food Chem Tox. 50:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojo Camargo MC, Toledo MCF. 2003. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Brazilian vegetables and fruits. Food Control. 14:49–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SCF] Scientific Committee on Food. 2002. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on the risks to human health of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food. SCF/CS/CNTM/PAH/29 Final. Brussels: European Commission. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Directorate C – Scientific Opinions.
   Google Scholar