Introduction to new guidelines for validation of methods to examine visually recognisable substances

References

• Alm T. 2003. The witch trials of Finnmark, northern Norway, during the 17th century: evidence for ergotism as a contributing factor. Econ Bot. 57(3):403–416. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0403:TWTOFN2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato G, Desiato R, Giovannini T, Pinotti L, Tretola M, Gili M, Marchis D. 2017. Gravimetric quantitative determination of packaging residues in feed from former food. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34(8):1446–1450. doi:10.1080/19440049.2017.1337277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1998. Workshop on identification of animal ingredients in compound feed focusing on the microscopical method for identification. Copenhagen: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, The Danish Plant Directorate (J.S. Jorgenson, M.Sc.Agric.), CEMA-DG VI-SMT Program.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2002. Appendix D: guidelines for collaborative study procedures to validate characteristics of a method of analysis. Available from: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/appendices.asp.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2016. Appendix F: guidelines for standard method performance requirements. Available from: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/appendices.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Berk Z. 2018. Food process engineering and technology. 3rd ed. London, San Diego: Academic Press, Chapter 6: Size reduction.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt da Silva R, Williams A, editors. 2015. Eurachem/CITAC guide: setting and using target uncertainty in chemical measurement. 1st ed. Available from: https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/gd-stmu.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2018. EN 15587 - cereals and cereal products - determination of Besatz in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.), rye (Secale cereale L.) and feed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Pilsen: European Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius. 2004. Guidelines on measurement uncertainty. CAC/GL 54-2004. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Currie LA. 1995. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl. Chem. 67(10):1699–1723. doi:10.1351/pac199567101699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison SLR, Williams A, editors. 2012. Eurachem/CITAC guide number 4: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 3rd ed. Available from https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam.
   Google Scholar
• Engling FP, Jørgenson JS, Paradies-Severin I, Hahn H. 2000. Evidence of animal meal in feeds. FeedMagazine/Kraftfutter. 1:14–17.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Commission Directive 98/88/EC of 13 November 1998 establishing guidelines for the microscopic identification and estimation of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feedingstuffs. OJ L. 318:45–50.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. OJ L. 54:1–130.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2007. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the European Commission related to Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as undesirable substances in animal feed. EFSA J. 447:1–51.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2011. Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) Scientific Opinion on Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food and feed. EFSA J. 9:2406–2539.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2012. Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements. EFSA J. 10:2663–2722. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2002. Directive 2002/32/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed. OJ L. 140:10–22.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2021. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 march 2021 on the performance of analytical methods for residues of pharmacologically active substances used in food-producing animals and on the interpretation of results as well as on the methods to be used for sampling and repealing decisions 2002/657/EC and 98/179/EC. OJ L. 180:84–114.
   Google Scholar
• FAO and WHO. 2019. Hazards associated with animal feed. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO expert meeting – 12–15 May 2015, FAO headquarters, Rome, Italy. FAO animal production and health report no. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Frick G, Boschung H, Schulz-Schroeder G, Russ G, Ujčič-Vrhovnik I, Jakovac-Strajn B, Angetter D, John I, Jørgensen JS. 2011. Ragweed (Ambrosia sp.) seeds in bird feed. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 15(S1):39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Frohne D, Pfänder HJ. 2005. Poisonous plants. A handbook for doctors, pharmacists, toxicologists, biologists and veterinarians. 2nd ed. London: Manson Publ. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fumière O, Veys P, Marien A, Baeten V, Berben G. 2017. Combined microscopy-PCR EURL-AP Proficiency Test 2016. Final version. European Union Reference Laboratory for Animal Proteins in feedingstuffs, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Gassner G, Hohmann B, Deutschmann F. 1989. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen pflanzlicher Lebensmittel, 5. Auflage. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gizzi G, von Holst C, Baeten V, Berben G, van Raamsdonk LWD. 2004. Determination of Processed Animal Proteins, Including Meat and Bone Meal, in Animal Feed. J AOAC. 87(6):1334–1341. doi:10.3390/ijms17040445
   Google Scholar
• Hahn H, Michaelsen I. 1996. Mikroskopische Diagnostik pflanzlicher Nahrungs-, Genuss- und Futtermittel, einschliesslich Gewuerze. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann B. 2006. Mikroskopische Untersuchung Pflanzlicher Lebensmittel Und Futtermittel. Hamburg: Behr’s Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz W. 1995. Protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method-performance studies (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem. 67(2):331–343. doi:10.1351/pac199567020331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz W, Albert R. 2006. The Horwitz Ratio (HorRat): a useful index of method performance with respect to precision. J AOAC Int. 89(4):1095–1109. doi:10.1093/jaoac/89.4.1095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2010. Conformity assessment - general requirements for proficiency testing. ISO/IEC 17043:2010(E). Brussels: CEN/CENELEC.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2010. Spices – saffron (Crocus sativus L.) – part 2: test methods. Geneva: NEN-ISO 3632-2:2010.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva: ISO/ICE 17025:2017(E).
   Google Scholar
• Kakar F, Akbarian Z, Leslie T, Mustafa ML, Watson J, Egmond H. v, Omar MF, Mofleh J. 2010. An Outbreak of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in western Afghanistan associated with exposure to wheat flour contaminated with pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J Tox. 2010:1–7. doi:10.1155/2010/313280
   Google Scholar
• Krska R, Crews C. 2008. Significance, chemistry and determination of ergot alkaloids: a review. Food Addit Contam A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 25(6):722–731. doi:10.1080/02652030701765756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton SD, Chevennement R, Nagelkerke N, Lombard B. 2002. Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative microbiological methods: accordance and concordance. Int J Food Microbiol. 79(3):175–181. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00107-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie HA, van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, Vethaak D, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Lamoree MH. 2022. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int. 163:107199. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Han LJ, Veys P, Baeten V, Jiang XP, Dardenne P. 2011. An overview of the legislation and light microscopy for detection of processed animal proteins in feeds. Microsc Res Tech. 74(8):735–743. doi:10.1002/jemt.20951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz K, Hoseney RC. 1979. Ergot on cereal grains. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 11(4):311–354. doi:10.1080/10408397909527267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchis D, Amato G, Giovannini T, Khadjavi A, Morello S, Gili M, Pinotti L, Ujčič Vrhovnik I. 2021. Gravimetric quantitative validation of botanic impurities in feed. J Sci Food Agric. 101(3):1047–1052. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 22(3):276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peereboom DPKH, Hedemann JBGM, Smits CPAF, de Nijs M, van Raamsdonk LWD. 2021. Proficiency test for ergot sclerotia in cereals; EURLPT-MP05 (2020). Report 2021.002. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pocklington WD. 1990. Harmonized protocols for the adoption of standardized analytical methods and for the presentation of their performance characteristics. Pure Appl Chem. 62(1):149–162. doi:10.1351/pac199062010149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahfeld B. 2009. Mikroskopischer Farbatlas pflanzlicher Drogen. Heidelberg: Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer R. 1981. Pollen identification for beekeepers. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer R. 1988. Honey identification. Cardiff: Cardiff Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott PM. 2009. Ergot alkaloids: extent of human and animal exposure. World Mycotoxin J. 2(2):141–149. doi:10.3920/WMJ2008.1109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidemann J. 1966. Stärke-Atlas. Berlin: Parey.
   Google Scholar
• Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stehman SV. 1997. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens Environm. 62(1):77–89. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R. 2002. Harmonized guidelines for single laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem. 74(5):835–855. doi:10.1351/pac200274050835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet H, van Raamsdonk LWD. 2004. Estimation of accordance and concordance in inter-laboratory trials of analytical methods with qualitative results. Intl J Food Microbiol. 95:231–234. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Prins TW, Meijer N, Scholtens I, Bremer M, de Jong J. 2019. Bridging legal requirements and analytical methods of animal proteins in feed for eradication of prion diseases. Food Add Cont A. 36(1):46–73. doi:10.1080/19440049.2018.1543956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Frick G, Ujčič Vrhovnik I, Zadravec M, Zegers J, Krull-Wöhrmann R, Weiss R, van der Borg G. 2022. Quality assurance and control of visual methods for feed and food inspection. Part 1: theory and principles, part 2: validation. Report 2022.006. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Pinckaers VGZ, Scholtens IMJ, Prins TW, van der Voet H, Vliege JJM. 2014. IAG ring test animal proteins 2014. Report 2014.011. Wageningen: RIKILT. http://edepot.wur.nl/323884
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Prins TW, van de Rhee N, Vliege JJM, Pinckaers VGZ. 2017. Microscopic recognition and identification of fish meal in compound feeds. Food Addit Contam A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34(8):1364–1376. doi:10.1080/19440049.2017.1283711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Rijk R, Schouten GPJ, Mennes W, Meijer GAL, van der Poel A, de Jong J. 2011. A risk evaluation of traces of packaging materials in former food products intended as feed materials. Report 2011.002. Wageningen: RIKILT. http://edepot.wur.nl/171617.
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, Smits CPAF, van der Borg G. 2022. A validated method for detection and quantification of packaging materials in candy syrup. Report 2022.008. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• van der Borg G, Smits CPAF, Hedemann B, Prins TW, van Raamsdonk LWD. 2022. IAG proficiency test animal proteins 2022. Report 2022.010. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, van der Voet H. 2003. A ring trial for the detection of animal tissues in feeds in the presence of fish meal. Report 2003.012. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research. https://edepot.wur.nl/34989
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, van der Voet H. 2022. Measurement uncertainty for detection of visual impurities in granular feed and food materials in relation to the investigated amount of material. Food Add Contam. 39:1265–1283. doi:10.1080/19440049.2022.2066193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, van der Zande M, Koelmans AA, Hoogenboom RLAP, Peters RJB, Groot MJ, Peijnenburg AACM, Weesepoel YJA. 2020. Current insights into monitoring, bioaccumulation, and potential health effects of microplastics present in the food chain. Foods. 9(1):72–99. doi:10.3390/foods9010072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, van Scholtens IMJ, Ossenkoppele J, van Egmond H, Groot M. 2011. Investigation into blood plasma in milk formula. Report 2011.003. Wageningen: RIKILT. http://edepot.wur.nl/184869
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD, van Vancutsem J, Jorgensen JS. 2009. A survey on the presence of undesirable botanical substances in feed in the European Union. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 13(S):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• van Raamsdonk LWD. 2007. A survey for the presence of botanic undesirable substances in feed. Report 2007.004. Wageningen: Wageningen Food Safety Research. http://edepot.wur.nl/39987.
   Google Scholar
• Veys P, Berben G, Baeten V. 2007. CRL-AP Proficiency Test 2007. Final report. Gembloux: Community Reference Laboratory for Animal Proteins in feedingstuffs, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Veys P, Fumière O, Marien A, Baeten V, Berben G. 2016. Combined microscopy-PCR EURL-AP Proficiency Test 2015. Final version. European Union Reference Laboratory for Animal Proteins in feedingstuffs, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Veys P, Fumière O, Marien A. 2022. Combined microscopy-P CR EURL-AP Proficiency Test 2021. Final version. European Union Reference Laboratory for Animal Proteins in feedingstuffs, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf A. 2000. Witchcraft or mycotoxin? The Salem witch trials. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 38(4):457–460. doi:10.1081/clt-100100958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar