855
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Managing knowledge claims in classroom discourse: the public construction of a homogeneous epistemic status

References

  • Bateman, Amanda. 2015. Conversation Analysis and Early Childhood Education: The Co-production of Knowledge and Relationships. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Beach, Wayne A. 1993. “Transitional Regularities for ‘Casual’ Okay Usage.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (4): 325–352.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4
  • Beach, Wayne A., and Terri R. Metzger. 1997. “Claiming Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 562–588.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x
  • Drew, Paul. 2012. “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68.10.1080/08351813.2012.646688
  • Enfield, Nick J. 2011. “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jan Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674
  • Gardner, Rod. 2007. “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36: 319–341.
  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Goodwin, Charles. 2013. “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
  • Hansen-Thomas, Holly, and Juliet Langman. 2017. “Deictics and the Construction of Mathematics and Science Knowledge in the Secondary School Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 8 (2): 122–138.
  • Heller, Vivien. 2016. “Meanings at Hand: Coordinating Semiotic Resources in Explaining Mathematical Terms in Classroom Discourse.” Classroom Discourse 7 (3): 253–275.10.1080/19463014.2016.1207551
  • Hellermann, John. 2003. “The Interactive Work of Prosody in the IRF Exchange: Teacher Repetition in Feedback Moves.” Language in Society 32 (1): 79–104.
  • Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2016. “A Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: ICH WEIß NICHT as a Resource for Dispreferred Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 97–114.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.002
  • Heritage, John. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
  • Heritage, John. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
  • Heritage, John. 2013a. “Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 551–578.10.1177/1461445613501449
  • Heritage, John. 2013b. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 370–394. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hußmann, Stephan, Thorsten Jürgensen, Timo Leuders, Karin Richter, Wolfgang Riemer, and Hartmut Schermuly. 2005. Lambacher Schweizer 5: Mathematik für Gymnasien Nordrhein-Westfalen. Stuttgart: Klett.
  • Jakonen, Teppop, and To Morton. 2015. “Epistemic Search Sequences in Peer Interaction in a Content-based Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 73–94.10.1093/applin/amt031
  • Kääntä, Leila. 2014. “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 86–105.
  • Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.48
  • Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.115
  • Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572
  • Kern, Friederike. submitted. “Clappings Hand with the Teacher: What Synchronization Reveals About Learning.” Journal of Pragmatics.
  • Kern, Friederike, Beate Lingnau, and Ingwer Paul. 2015. “The Construction of ‘Academic Language’ in German Classrooms. Communicative Practices and Linguistic Norms in Morning Circles.” Linguistics and Education 31: 207–220.10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.005
  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1979. “Wegauskünfte.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 9: 9–57.
  • Koole, Tom. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access: Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 183–209.10.1080/08351811003737846
  • Koole, Tom. 2012a. “Teacher Evaluations. Assessing ‘Knowing’, ‘Understanding’, and ‘Doing’.” In Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction, edited by G. Rasmussen, C. E. Brouwer, and D. Day, 43–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
  • Koole, Tom. 2012b. “The Epistemics of Student Problems: Explaining Mathematics in a Multi-lingual Class.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1902–1916.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006
  • Koschmann, Timothy, and Alan Zemel. 2011. “Discovering the Learnable.” Paper presented at IIEMCA 2011, Fribourg, July.
  • Koshik, Irene. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Device for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
  • Koshik, Irene. 2003. “Wh-questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 5 (1): 51–77.10.1177/14614456030050010301
  • Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
  • Lerner, Gene H. 1993. “Collectivities in Action: Establishing the Relevance of Conjoined Participation in Conversation.” Text & Talk 13 (2): 213–245.
  • Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer, and Jonas Ivarsson. 2016. “Epistemic Status and The Recognizability of Social Actions.” Discourse Studies 18 (5): 500–525.10.1177/1461445616657958
  • Linell, Per, and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. “Asymmetries in Dialogue: Some Conceptual Preliminaries.” In Asymmetries in Dialogue, edited by Ivana Markovà and Klaus Foppa, 1–20. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, Barnes and Noble.
  • Macbeth, Douglas. 2011. “Understanding Understanding as an Instructional Matter.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 438–451.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006
  • Majlesi, Ali R., and Mathias Broth. 2012. “Emergent Learnables in Second Language Classroom Interaction.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (3–4): 193–207.10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.004
  • Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
  • Mercer, Neil. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 597–626.10.1177/1461445613501577
  • Morek, Miriam. 2015. “Show that you know - Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family talk and peer talk.” Linguistics and Education 31: 238–259.
  • Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling My Side: ‘Limited Access’ as a ‘Fishing’ Device.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 186–198.10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
  • Quasthoff, Uta, Vivien Heller, and Miriam Morek. 2017. “On the Sequential Organization and Genre-orientation of Discourse Units in Interaction: An Analytic Framework.” Discourse Studies 19 (1): 84–110.10.1177/1461445616683596
  • Rusk, Frederik, Michaela Pörn, and Fritjof Sahlström. 2016. “The Management of Dynamic Epistemic Relationships Regarding Second Language Knowledge in Second Language Education: Epistemic Discrepancies and Epistemic (im)balance.” Classroom Discourse 7 (2): 184–205.10.1080/19463014.2016.1171160
  • Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David Sudnow, 31–63. New York: Free press.
  • Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301
  • Schütz, Alfred. 1946. “The Well-informed Citizen. An Essay on the Social Distribution of Knowledge.” Social Research 13 (1): 463–478.
  • Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, et al. 2011. “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51.
  • Sert, Olcay. 2011. “A Micro-analytic Investigation of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in EAL Classrooms.” PhD Thesis, Newcaste University, Newcastle.
  • Sert, Olcay. 2013. “‘Epistemic Status Check’ as an Interactional Phenomenon in Instructed Learning Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 13–28.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005
  • Sert, Olcay, and Steve Walsh. 2013. “The Interactional Management of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in English Language Classrooms.” Language and Education 27 (6): 542–565.10.1080/09500782.2012.739174
  • Sherzer, Joel. 1991. “The Brazilian Thumbs-Up Gesture.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1: 189–197.10.1525/jlin.1991.1.issue-2
  • Sidnell, Jack. 2012. “‘Who Knows Best?’: Evidentiality and Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Society 3 (2): 294–320.
  • Skarbø Solem, M. 2016a. “Displaying Knowledge Through Interrogatives in Student-initiated Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 7 (1): 18–35.10.1080/19463014.2015.1095105
  • Skarbø Solem, M. 2016b. “Negotiating Knowledge Claims: Students’ Assertions in Classroom Interactions.” Discourse Studies 18 (5): 1–21.
  • Steensig, Jan, and Trine Heinemann. 2016. “Throwing the Baby Out with the Bath Water? Commentary on the Criticism of the ‘Epistemic Program’.” Discourse Studies 18 (5): 597–609.10.1177/1461445616659173
  • Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2014. “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface Between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (2): 185–207.10.1017/S0047404514000037
  • Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jan Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Loranza Mondada and Jan Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674
  • Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis D. LeBaron. 2011. “Embodied Interaction in the Material World: an Introduction.” In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, edited by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis D. LeBaron, 1–26. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2017. “Creating Space for Learner Autonomy: An Interactional Perspective.” Classroom Discourse 8 (2): 175–190.
  • Weatherall, Ann. 2011. “I Don't Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 44 (4): 317–337.10.1080/08351813.2011.619310

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.