Clarification requests as a method of pursuing understanding in CLIL physics lectures

References

• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.20
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. , and S. Kjaerbeck . 2012. “Treating Student Contributions as Displays of Understanding in Group Supervision.” In Evaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction , edited by G. Rasmussen , C. E. Brouwer and D. Day , 67–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. 2013. “Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. , and N. Evnitskaya . 2014. “‘Do You Know Actimel?’ the Adaptive Nature of Dialogic Teacher-Led Discussions in the CLIL Science Classroom: A Case Study.” The Language Learning Journal 42 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889507.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. , and J. Wagner . 2013. “Recurring and Shared Gestures in the L2 Classroom: Resources for Teaching and Learning.” EuJal 1 (1): 139–161. doi:10.1515/eujal-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• de Fornel, M. 1992. “The Return Gesture: Some Remarks on Context, Inference and Iconic Gesture.” In The Contextualization of Language , edited by P. Auer and A. di Luzio , 159–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Garton, S. 2012. “Speaking out of Turn? Taking the Initiative in Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1080/19463014.2012.666022.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. , and S. Clayman . 2010. Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J. , P. Reynolds , and S. Dunne . 2011. “Exhibiting Understanding: The Body in Apprenticeship.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 489–503. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacknick, C. M. 2011. “Breaking in is Hard to Do: How Students Negotiate Classroom Activity Shifts.” Classroom Discourse 2 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.562656.
   Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. , and T. Morton . 2015. “Epistemic Search Sequences in Peer Interaction in a Content-Based Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 73–94. doi:10.1093/applin/amt031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation , edited by G. Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. 2014. “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 86–105. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. forthcoming. “Multimodal Perspective into Teachers’ Definitional Practices: Comparing Subject-Specific Language in Physics and History Lessons.” In Emerging Issues in Classroom Discourse and Interaction: Theoretical and Applied CA Perspectives on Pedagogy , edited by S. Kunitz , N. Markee , and O. Sert . Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. , G. Kasper , and A. Piirainen-Marsh . 2016. “Explaining Hooke’s Law: Definitional Practices in a CLIL Physics Classroom.” Applied Linguistics : 1–25. doi: 10.1093/applin/amw025 ( Advance Access)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access: Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 183–209. doi:10.1080/08351811003737846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2012. “The Epistemics of Student Problems: Explaining Mathematics in a Multi-Lingual Class.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1902–1916. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. , and E. Elbers . 2014. “Responsiveness in Teacher Explanations: A Conversation Analytical Perspective on Scaffolding.” Linguistics and Education 26: 57–69. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. , C. LeBaron , C. Goodwin , and P. Feltovich . 2011. ““Can You See the Cystic Artery Yet?” a Simple Matter of Trust.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 521–541. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja, N. 2014. “Matematiikkaa vai suomea? S2-oppijoiden oma-aloitteiset kysymykset peruskoulun matematiikan oppitunneilla.” In Tulevaisuuden Kielenkäyttäjä [Language users of tomorrow], edited by M. Mutta , P. Lintunen , I. Ivaska and P. Peltonen , 25–48. AFinLA Yearbook 2014. Jyväskylä: Publications de l’Association Finlandaise de Linguistique Appliquée. no. 72.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, J. , Y. Maschler , and S. Pekarek Doehler . 2016. “A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 72–79. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O. , and G. Lymer . 2011. “Uses of ‘Understand’ in Science Education.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 452–474. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O. , G. Lymer , and C. Greiffenhagen . 2015. “The Sequential Analysis of Instruction.” In The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction , edited by N. Markee , 375–411. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. 2011. “Understanding Understanding as an Instructional Matter.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 438–451. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R. 2018. “Instructed Vision: Navigating Grammatical Rules by Using Landmarks for Linguistic Structures in Corrective Feedback Sequences.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (Supplement 2018): 11–29. doi:10.1111/modl.12452.
   Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R. , and M. Broth . 2012. “Emergent Learnables in Second Language Classroom Interaction.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1: 193–207.10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N. 1994. “Toward an Ethnomethodological Respecification of Second-Language Acquisition Studies.” In Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition , edited by E. Tarone , S. M. Gass and A. D. Cohen , 89–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: social organization in the classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
   Google Scholar
• Merke, S. 2016. “Establishing the Explainable in Finnish-as-a-Foreign-Language Classroom Interaction: Student-Initiated Explanation Sequences.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 9: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2011. “Understanding as an Embodied, Situated and Sequential Achievement in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 542–552. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2015. “Vocabulary Explanations in CLIL Classrooms: A Conversation Analysis Perspective.” The Language Learning Journal 43: 256–270. doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1053283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2007. “The IRF Pattern and Space for Interaction: Observations on EFL and CLIL Classrooms.” In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse , edited by C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit , 179–204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2017. “‘What’s the Moment Thingy?’- on the Emergence of Subject-Specific Knowledge in CLIL Classroom Interaction.” In Discourse Analytic Perspectives on STEM Education , edited by J. Langman and H. Hansen-Thomas , 11–29. Basel: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-55116-6
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. 2006. “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships during Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73: 137–161.10.1080/03637750600581206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation . Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. , E. A. Schegloff , and G. Jefferson . 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. , G. Jefferson , and H. Sacks . 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. , and S. Walsh . 2013. “The Interactional Management of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in English Language Classrooms.” Language and Education 27 (6): 542–565. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.739174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. , and T. Stivers , eds. 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016a. “Displaying Knowledge through Interrogatives in Student-Initiated Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 7 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1080/19463014.2015.1095105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016b. “Negotiating Knowledge Claims: Students’ Assertions in Classroom Interactions.” Discourse Studies 18 (6): 737–757. doi:10.1177/1461445616668072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somuncu, D. and O. Sert . forthcoming. “EFL Trainee Teachers’ Orientations to Students’ Non-Understanding: A Focus on Task Instructions.” In Conversation Analytic Perspectives on English Language Learning and Teaching in Global Contexts: Constraints and Possibilities , edited by H. T. Nguyen and T. Malabarba . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, O. , and J. Cromdal . 2016. “Crafting Instructions Collaboratively: Student Questions and Dual Addressivity in Classroom Task Instructions.” Discourse Processes 53 (4): 252–279. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1038128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. , and F. Rossano . 2012. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. , C. Goodwin , and C. LeBaron , eds. 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiation of Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 333–348.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2006. Investigating Classroom Discourse . London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities in the Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (2): 201–218. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.614053.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2012. “‘Any Questions?’: Investigating the Nature of Understanding-Checks in the Language Classroom.” TESOL Quarterly 46 (4): 722–752. doi:10.1002/tesq.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations . 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar