Knowledge disagreement formulations in problem-based learning tutorials: balancing pedagogical demands with ‘saving face’

References

• Almajed, A., V. Skinner, R. Peterson, and T. Winning. 2016. “Collaborative Learning: Students’ Perspectives on How Learning Happens.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 10: 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angouri, J., and M. A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1549–1553. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. 1994. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., and E. H. Stokoe. 2002. “Constructing Discussion Tasks in University Tutorials: Shifting Dynamics and Identities.” Discourse Studies 4: 429–453.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A., and B.-W. Polly. 2013. “Peer Group Interactions in Multilingual Educational Settings: Co-Constructing Social Order and Norms for Language Use.” International Journal of Bilingualism 17: 174–188. doi:10.1177/1367006912441417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D., and J. Wagner. 2014. “Objects as Tools for Talk.” In Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, edited by M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa, 101–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• De Grave, W. S., H. P. A. Boshuizen, and H. G. Schmidt. 1996. “Problem Based Learning: Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes during Problem Analysis.” Instructional Science 24: 321–341. doi:10.1007/BF00118111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 1997. “‘Open’ class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edstrom, A. 2004. “Expressions of Disagreement by Venezuelans in Conversation: Reconsidering the Influence of Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1499–1518. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A. 2001. “Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1881–1900. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00034-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., and J. Heritage. 1990. “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, PO Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303-0139, USA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. 2008. “A Scheme for Understanding Group Processes in Problem-Based Learning.” Higher Education 55: 505–518. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9071-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, T. 1996. “Politeness in Conflict Management: A Conversation Analysis of Dispreferred Message from A Cognitive Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 227–255. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)00080-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G., S. Wiggins, and T. Anderson. 2016. “The Discursive Construction of Group Cohesion in Problem-Based Learning Tutorials.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 15: 180–194.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45: 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-In-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16: 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y., and D. Aline. 2015. “Single Episode Analysis of Extended Conflict Talk Sequences in Second Language Classroom Discussion.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3: 231–262. doi:10.1075/jlac.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J. 2014. “Agreeing to Disagree: ‘Doing Disagreement’ in Assessed Oral L2 Interactions.” Classroom Discourse 2: 194–215. doi:10.1080/19463014.2014.893897.
   Google Scholar
• Imafuku, R., and S. Bridges. 2016. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on Analyzing Interactions in PBL-Where to Go from Here?” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 10: 6. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T., and T. Morton. 2015. “Epistemic Search Sequences in Peer Interaction in a Content-Based Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 36: 73–94. doi:10.1093/applin/amt031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. 2015. “Handling Knowledge: Using Classroom Materials to Construct and Interpret Information Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 89: 100–112. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1984. “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 346: 369.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., and E. A. Mannix. 2001. “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 44: 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. 2006. “Agreement and Disagreement: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” BISAL 1: 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. 2014. “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 86–105. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access: Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 183–209. doi:10.1080/08351811003737846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2012. “The Epistemics of Student Problems: Explaining Mathematics in a Multi-Lingual Class.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1902–1916. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, S.-H. 1994. “Agreement and Disagreement Strategies in a Radio Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 27: 95–121. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2702_1.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, S. 2005. “Conflict Talk: A Discourse Analytical Perspective.” Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics ( Columbia University Academic Commons) 2: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. 2011. “Understanding Understanding as an Instructional Matter.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 438–451. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, M. 2012. “Disagreeing without Being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1580–1590. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. 1985. “Agreement and Disagreement in Conversations and Letters.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 5: 201–228.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, K. 2014. “‘I Will Send Badass Viruses.’ Peer Threats and the Interplay of Pretend Frames in a Classroom Dispute.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–229. doi:10.1007/BF00148128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984a. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.“ In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Chap. 4, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984b. “Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling ‘How I Know’.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 607–625. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., and J. Heritage. 2012. “Preference.“ In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Chap. 11, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 210–228. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rendle-Short, J. 2015. “Dispreferred Responses When Texting: Delaying that ‘No’ response.” Discourse & Communication 9: 643–661. doi:10.1177/1750481315600309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” Talk and Social Organization 54: 69.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. 2006. “Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions Anddistinctions.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1: 3. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G. 1993. “Foundations of Problem-Based Learning: Some Explanatory Notes.” Medical Education 27: 422–432. doi:10.1111/medu.1993.27.issue-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. 2002. “Linguistic Feature Variation within Disagreements: An Empirical Investigation.” Text & Talk 22: 301–328.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2013. “‘Epistemic Status Check’ as an Interactional Phenomenon in Instructed Learning Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 45: 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. K. 2012. “Conceding in Disagreements during Small Group Interactions in Academic Writing Class.” Classroom Discourse 3: 4–28. doi:10.1080/19463014.2012.666024.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. K. 2013. “Enactment of Teacher Identity in Resolving Student Disagreements in Small Group Peer Interactions.” Linguistics and Education 24: 247–259. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2012.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifianou, M. 2012. “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1554–1564. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (Taylor & Francis) 38: 131–158. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., L. Mondada, and J. Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–24. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E., B. Benwell, and F. Attenborough. 2013. “University Students Managing Engagement, Preparation, Knowledge and Achievement: Interactional Evidence from Institutional, Domestic and Virtual Settings.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2: 75–90. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainio, L. 2011. “Gendered Address Terms in Reproach Sequences in Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 22: 330–347. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2010.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, W., and K. L. Saxton. 1997. “Modal Expressions as Facework in Refusals to Comply with Requests: I Think I Should Say ‘No’right Now.” Journal of Pragmatics 27: 145–181. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00034-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Houwen, F. 2009. “Formulating Disputes.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2072–2085. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2001. “Balancing the Competing Interests in Seminar Discussion: Peer Referencing and Asserting Vulnerability.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 12: 29–50.
   Google Scholar