2,416
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Co-adaptation processes in plenary teacher-student talk and the development of L2 interactional competence

ORCID Icon

References

  • Bächle, H., G. Gregor, C. Jorißen, and S. Schenk. 2013. A plus! 2 Lehrwerk für den Französischunterricht an Gymnasien. Berlin: Cornelsen.
  • Cekaite, A. 2007. “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in A Swedish L2 Classroom.” Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x.
  • Cekaite, A. 2017. “What Makes a Child a Good Language Learner? Interactional Competence, Identity, and Immersion in a Swedish Classroom.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 37: 45–61. doi:10.1017/S0267190517000046.
  • Daşkın, N. C. 2015. “Shaping Learner Contributions in an EFL Classroom: Implications for L2 Classroom Interactional Competence.” Classroom Discourse 6 (1): 35–56.
  • Dings, A. 2014. “Interactional Competence and the Development of Alignment Activity.” Modern Language Journal 98 (3): 742–756. doi:10.1111/modl.12120.
  • Eskildsen, S. W. 2008. “Constructing a Second Language Inventory – The Accumulation of Linguistic Resources in L2 English.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Southern Denmark.
  • Farina, C., E. Pochon-Berger, and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2012. “Le développement de la compétence d’ interaction: Une étude sur le travail lexical.” Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique 57: 101–119.
  • Firth, A., and J. Wagner. 1997. “On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in Sla Research.” The Modern Language Journal 81 (3): 285–300.
  • Gardner, R. 2004. “On Delaying the Answer: Question Sequences Extended after the Question.” In Second Language Conversations, edited by R. Gardner and J. Wagner, 246–266. London: Continuum.
  • Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Gregor, G., C. Jorißen, and S. Schenk. 2015. A plus! 4 Cycle Long. Lehrwerk für den Französischunterricht an Gymnasien. Berlin: Cornelsen.
  • Hall, J. K. 2018. “From L2 Interactional Competence to L2 Interactional Repertoires: Reconceptualising the Objects of L2 Learning.” Classroom Discourse 9 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050.
  • Hall, J. K., J. Hellermann, and S. P. Doehler. 2011. “L2 Interactional Competence and Development.” In L2 Interactional Comptence and Development, edited by J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, and S. Pekarek Doehler, 1–18. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Harness Goodwin, M. 1983. “Aggravated Correction and Disagreement in Children’s Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (6): 657–677. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9.
  • He, A. W., and R. Young. 1998. “Language Proficiency Interviews: A Discourse Approach.” In Talking and Testing. Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, edited by R. Young and A. W. He, 1–26. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Hellermann, J. 2003. “The Interactive Work of Prosody in the IRF Exchange: Teacher Repetition in Feedback Moves.” Language in Society 32: 79–104. doi:10.1017/S0047404503321049.
  • Hellermann, J. 2007. “The Development of Practices for Action in Classroom Dyadic Interaction: Focus on Task Openings.” The Modern Language Journal 91: 83–96. doi:10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-1.
  • Hellermann, J., and Y.-A. Lee. 2014. “Members and Their Competencies: Contributions of Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis to a Multilingual Turn in Second Language Acquisition.” System 44: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.02.006.
  • Heritage, J. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.
  • Hosoda, Y., and D. Aline. 2013. “Two Preferences in Question–answer Sequences in Language Classroom Context.” Classroom Discourse 4 (1): 63–88. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2013.783497.
  • Kasper, G. 2006. “When once Is Not Enough: Politeness of Multiple Requests in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” Multilingua 25: 323–350. doi:10.1515/MULTI.2006.018.
  • Kasper, G., and S. J. Ross. 2007. “Multiple Questions in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (11): 2045–2070. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.011.
  • Koole, T., and E. Elbers. 2014. “Responsiveness in Teacher Explanations: A Conversation Analytical Perspective on Scaffolding.” Linguistics and Education 26: 57–69. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.02.001.
  • Koshik, I. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2.
  • Koskela, I., I. Arminen, C.E. Gitte Rasmussen, and Dennis Day. 2012. “The Embedded Evaluations in Air Traffic Control Training.” In Evaluating Cognition in Interaction, edited by Gitte Rasmussen, C.E. Brouwer, and Dennis Day, 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2010. “Having and Doing: Learning from a Complexity Theory Perspective.” In Conceptualising ’Learning in Applied Linguistics, edited by P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, and C. Jenks, 52–68. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lee, Y.-A. 2007. “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (6): 1204–1230. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003.
  • Margutti, P., and P. Drew. 2014. “Positive Evaluation of Student Answers in Classroom Instruction.” Language and Education 28 (5): 436–458. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/09500782.2014.898650.
  • Markee, N., and G. Kasper. 2004. “Classroom Talks: An Introduction.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 491–500. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781.
  • Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mondada, L., and S. P. Doehler. 2004. “Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 501–518. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x.
  • Mondada, L., and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2006. “La notion de compétence: études critiques.” Bulletin Suisse De Linguistique Appliquée 84 (Special Issue): 1–8.
  • Nguyen, H. T. 2012. “Social Interaction and Competence Development: Learning the Structural Organization of a Communicative Practice.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (2): 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.05.006.
  • Park, Y. 2014. “The Roles of Third-Turn Repeats in Two L2 Classroom Interactional Contexts.” Applied Linguistics 35 (2): 145–167. doi:10.1093/applin/amt006.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2015. “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, edited by Teresa Cadierno and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 233–270. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S. 2018. “Elaborations on L2 Interactional Competence: The Development of L2 Grammar-for-Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 9 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Berger. 2018. “L2 Interactional Competence as Increased Ability for Context-Sensitive Conduct: A Longitudinal Study of Story-Openings: Table 1:.” Applied Linguistics 39 (4): 555–578.
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., and I.-M. Stoenica. 2012. “Émergence, temporalité et grammaire-dans-l’interaction : Disloquée à gauche et nominativus pendens en français contemporain.” Langue Française 3: 111–127. doi:10.3917/lf.175.0111.
  • Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action - Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwab, G. 2011. “From Dialogue to Multilogue: A Different View on Participation in the English Foreign‐Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.562654.
  • Seedhouse, P. 2005. “Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187. doi:10.1017/S0261444805003010.
  • Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Sert, Olcay. 2017. “Creating Opportunities for L2 Learning in a Prediction Activity.” System 70: 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.08.008.
  • Sinclair, J. M., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Svennevig, J. 2013. “Reformulation of Questions with Candidate Answers.” International Journal of Bilingualism 17 (2): 189–204. doi:10.1177/1367006912441419.
  • Thoms, J. J. 2014. “An Ecological View of Whole-Class Discussions in a Second Language Literature Classroom: Teacher Reformulations as Affordances for Learning.” Modern Language Journal 98 (3): 724–741. doi:10.1111/modl.12119.
  • Trim, J., B. North, and D. Coste. 2001. Gemeinsamer Europäischer Referenzrahmen Für Sprachen: Lernen, Lehren, Beurteilen. München: Langenscheidt.
  • Van Lier, L. 2000a. “Constraints and Resources in Classroom Talk: Issues in Equality and Symmetry.” In English Language Teaching in Its Social Context: A Reader, edited by C. N. Candlin and N. Mercer, 90–107. New York: Routledge.
  • Van Lier, L. 2000b. “From Input to Affordance: Social Interactive Learning from an Ecological Perspective.” In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Recent Advances, edited by J. P. Lantolf, 245–259. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Lier, L. 2004. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer.
  • Wagner, J., S. Pekarek Doehler, and E. González-Martínez. 2018. “Longitudinal Research on the Organization of Social Interaction: Current Developments and Methodological Challenges„. In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, edited by S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner and E. González-Martínez, 3–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Walsh, S. 2012. “Conceptualising Classroom Interactional Competence.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 6 (1): 1–14.
  • Waring, H. Z. 2008. “Using Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom : IRF, Feedback, and Learning Opportunities.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (4): 577–594. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x.
  • Waring, H. Z. 2009. “Moving Out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A Single Case Analysis.” Language Learning 59 (4): 796–824. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x.
  • Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities in the Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (2): 201–218. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.614053.
  • Watanabe, A. 2017. “Developing L2 Interactional Competence: Increasing Participation through Self-Selection in Post-Expansion Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 8 (3): 271–293. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1354310.
  • Wood, D., J. Bruner, and G. Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17: 89–100. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1976.17.issue-2.
  • Young, R. F., and E. R. Miller. 2004. “Learning as Changing Participation : Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 519–535. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x.