The design of requests by adult L2 users with emergent literacy

References

• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2012. “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics 33 (1): 42–65. doi:10.1093/applin/amr031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2013. “‘Hi Doctor, Give Me Handouts’: Low-proficiency Learners and Requests.” ELT Journal 67 (4): 413–424. doi:10.1093/let/cct036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2014. “Insert and Post-Expansion in L2 Arabic Requests.” System 42: 189–206. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglade, C., G. Le Dorze, and C. Croteau. 2019. “Service Encounter Interactions of People Living with Moderate-to-serve Post-stroke Aphasia in Their Community.” Aphasiology 33 (9): 1061–1082. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1532068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglade, C., G. Le Dorze, and C. Croteau. 2021. “How Clerks Understand the Requests of People Living with Aphasia in Service Encounters.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetic 35 (1): 84–99. doi:10.1080/02699206.2020.1745894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigelow, M., J. Vanek, K. King, and N. Abdi. 2017. “Literacy as Social (Media) Practice: Refugee Youth and Native Language Literacy at School.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 60: 183–197. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., and E. Couper-Kuhlen. 2014. “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Eilola, L., and N. Lilja. 2021. “The Smartphone as a Personal Cognitive Artifact Supporting Participation in Interaction.” The Modern Language Journal 105 (1): 294–316. doi:10.1111/modl.12697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and G. Kasper. 2019. “Interactional Usage-Based L2 Pragmatics: From Form-meaning Pairings to Construction-action Relations.” In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, edited by N. Taquchi, 176–191. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and N. Markee. 2018. “L2 Talk as Social Accomplishment.” In Speaking in a Second Language, edited by R. Alonso Alonso, 71–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and G. Theodórsdóttir. 2017. “Constructing L2 Learning Spaces: Ways to Achieve Learning inside and outside the Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 38 (2): 143–164. doi:10.1093/applin/amv010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. 2015. The Language of Service Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, S. 2012. “Speaking Out of Turn? Taking the Initiative in Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1080/19463014.2012.666022.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalves, L. 2020. “Development and Demonstration of Metalinguistic Awareness in Adult ESL Learners with Emergent Literacy.” Language Awareness 30 (2): 134–151. doi:10.1080/09658416.2020.1776721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2007. “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill, edited by J. Cassell, E. T. Levy, D. McNeill, and S. D. Duncan, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2017. “Co-Operative Action.” New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, M., and A. Koivisto. Forthcoming. “Moving Money. Money as an Interactional Resource in Kiosk Encounters in Finland.” In Encounters at the Counter: Language, Embodiment and Material Objects in Shops, edited by B. Fox, L. Mondada, and M.-L. Sorjonen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2018a. “Languaging as Competencing: Considering Language Learning as Enactment.” Classroom Discourse 9 (1): 40–56. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1433052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2018b. “Talking about Reading: Changing Practices for a Literacy Event.” In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, edited by S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, and E. González–Martínez, 105–142. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J., S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, and A. Piirainen-Marsh, eds. 2019. Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action: The Complex Ecology of Second Language Interaction “In the Wild”. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. 2014. “Turn Organization and Bodily-vocal Demonstrations.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807572.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K., and P. Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance I Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49: 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. A., M. Bigelow, and A. Hirsi. 2017. “New to School and New to Print: Everyday Peer Interactions among Adolescent High School Newcomers.” International Multilingual Research Journal 11: 137–151. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1328958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. 2005. “Alternative Questions Used in Conversational Repair.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1177/1461445605050366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. 2006. “Second Language Interaction.” PhD diss., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2014. “The Graphic Transcript. Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action.” Geography Compass 8 (4): 235–248. doi:10.1111/gec3.12123.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, N. 2014. “Partial Repetitions as Other-initiations of Repair in Second Language Talk: Re-establishing Understanding and Doing Learning.” Journal of Pragmatics 71: 98–116. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014a. “Instructions in the Operation Rooms: How the Surgeon Directs Their Assistant’s Hands.” Discourse Studies 18 (2): 131–161. doi:10.1177/1461445613515325.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014b. “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014c. “Requesting Immediate Action in the Surgical Operating Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by P. Drew and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 269–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2018. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction. Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2019. “Contemporary Issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and Materiality, Multimodality and Multisensioriality in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. n.d. “Conventions for Multimodal Transcription.” Accessed 28 October 2021 https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., and M.-L. Sorjonen. 2016. “Making Multiple Requests in French and Finnish Convenience Stores.” Language in Society 45: 733–765. doi:10.1017/S0047404516000646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M., P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa. 2014. “On the Interactional Ecology of Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, edited by M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/z.186.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt, N. 2017. “Social Positioning in Refugee Women’s Education: A Linguistic Ethnography of One English Class.” PhD diss., Georgia State University. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/42
   Google Scholar
• Rauniomaa, M., and T. Keisanen. 2012. “Two Multimodal Formats for Responding to Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 829–842. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roever, C., and S. Al-Gahtani. 2015. “Multiple Requests in Arabic as a Second Language.” Multilingua 34 (3): 405–432. doi:10.1515/multi-2014-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. 2014. “When Do People Not Use Language to Make Request?” In In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by P. Drew and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 303–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. 2015. “The Request System in Italian Interaction.” PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen. MPI Series.
   Google Scholar
• Routarinne, S., and M. Ahlholm. 2021. “Developing Requests in Multilingual Classroom Interaction: A Case of Second Language Development in Middle Childhood.” Applied Linguistics 42: 1–26. doi:10.1093/applin/amaa048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routarinne, S., P. Heinonen, U. Karvonen, L. Tainio, and M. Ahlholm. 2020. “Touch in Achieving a Pedagogically Relevant Focus in Classrooms.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3: 1. doi:10.7146/si.v3i1.120281.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M., and L. Raevaara. 2014. “On the Grammatical Form of Requests at the Convenience Store: Requesting as Embodied Action.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by P. Drew and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 241–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. 2009. Gesturecraft. The Manu-facture on Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tammelin-Laine, T., and M. Martin. 2016. “Negative Constructions in Nonliterate Learners’ Spoken L2 Finnish.” In The Usage-based Study of Language Learning and Multilingualism, edited by L. Ortega, A. Tyler, H. I. Park, and M. Uno, 75–90. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarone, E. 2021. “Alphabetic Print Literacy Level and Noticing Oral Corrective Feedback in SLA.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, edited by H. Nassaji and E. Kartchava, 450–470. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
   Google Scholar