Preliminaries in paired role play L2 interactional competence assessment tasks

References

• Al-Gahtani, S. 2022. “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence in Arabic: The Case of Multiple Requests.” Foreign Language Annals 55 (2): 610–634. doi:10.1111/flan.12603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2012. “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics 33 (1): 42–65. doi:10.1093/applin/amr031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2014. “Preference Structure in L2 Arabic Requests.” Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (4): 619–643. doi:10.1515/ip-2014-0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gahtani, S., and C. Roever. 2018. “Proficiency and Preference Organization in Second Language Refusals.” Journal of Pragmatics 129: 140–153. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. 2018. “Task-Induced Development of Hinting Behaviors in Online Task-Oriented L2 Interaction.” Language Learning & Technology 21. doi:10.125/44640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. 2023. Conversation Analytic Language Teacher Education in Digital Spaces. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Balaman, U., and N. C. Daşkın. 2019. “A series of conversation analysis based pedagogical activities for increasing interactional awareness.” Journal of Inquiry Based Activities 9 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Barraja-Rohan, A. M. 2015. “I Told you”: Storytelling Development of a Japanese Learning English as a Second Language.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, edited by T. Cadierno and S. W. Eskildsen, 271–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110378528-013.
   Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, D., and B. Freitag-Hild. 2021. “Assessing Interactional Competence in Secondary Schools: Issues of Turn-Taking.” In Assessing Speaking in Context: Expanding the Construct and Its Applications, edited by M. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch, 237–267. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828-011.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, M. 1989. “The Evaluation Cycle for Language Learning Tasks.” In The Second Language Curriculum, edited by R. K. Johnson, 187–206. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524520.014.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M. 1983. “On Some Dimensions of Language Proficiency.” In Issues in Language Testing Research, edited by J. W. Oller, Jr., 333–342. Rowley: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., and M. Swain. 1980. “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.” Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., and P. A. Duff. 1994. “Same Task, Different Activities: Analysis of a SLA Task from an Activity Theory Perspective.” In Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, edited by J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel, 173–193. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Dooly, M. 2011. “Divergent Perceptions of Telecollaborative Language Learning Tasks: Task-As-Workplan Vs. Task-As-Process.” Language Learning & Technology 15 (2): 69–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyğun, S. 2021. “Role Exchange as an Interactional Resource for Maintaining Progressivity in Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks in L2 English.” MA diss., Hacettepe University.
   Google Scholar
• Ducasse, A. M., and A. Brown. 2009. “Assessing Paired Orals: Raters’ Orientation to Interaction.” Language Testing 26 (3): 423–443. doi:10.1177/0265532209104669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkle, S. 2021. “Using Social Deduction Board Games to Assess and Strengthen Interactional Competence in ESL Learners.” In Assessing Speaking in Context: Expanding the Construct and Its Applications, edited by M. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch, 149–211. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828-010.
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E. D. 2008. “Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination.” Language Assessment Quarterly 5 (2): 89–119. doi:10.1080/15434300801934702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E. D. 2014. “Interactional Competence Across Proficiency Levels: How Do Learners Manage Interaction in Paired Speaking Tests?” Applied Linguistics 35 (5): 553–574. doi:10.1093/applin/amt017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E. D., and L. Taylor. 2018. “Interactional Competence: Conceptualisations, Operationalisations, and Outstanding Questions.” Language Assessment Quarterly 15 (3): 219–236. doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, T. 2019. “Initiating and Delivering News of the Day: Interactional Competence as Joint-Development.” Journal of Pragmatics 146: 150–164. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havadar, E. E. 2022. “A Sequential Analysis of Task Entering Practices in Paired Role-Play Tasks.“ MA Thesis, Hacettepe University, Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2008. Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hırçın Çoban, M., and O. Sert. 2020. “Resolving Interactional Troubles and Maintaining Progressivity in Paired Speaking Assessment in an EFL Context.” Papers in Language Testing and Assessment 9 (1): 64–94. doi:10.58379/TWOS3837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, T. 2021. Interaction, Language Use, and Second Language Teaching. Language Use, and Second Language Teaching: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003017356.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, T., E. Betz, and C. Taleghani-Nikazm. 2019. “Rethinking Language Teacher Training: Steps for Making Talk-In-Interaction Research Accessible to Practitioners.” Classroom Discourse 10 (1): 99–122. doi:10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. 1972. “On Communicative Competence.” In Sociolinguistics, edited by J. B. Pride and J. Holmes, 269–293. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, N. 2017. “Measuring L2 Oral Pragmatic Abilities for Use in Social Contexts: Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for L2 Pragmatics Performance in University Settings.” PhD diss., University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies Form First Generation, edited by G. Lerner, 13–34. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns.125.02jef.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 2006. “Beyond Repair: Conversation Analysis as an Approach to SLA.” AILA Review 19 (1): 83–99. doi:10.1075/aila.19.07kas.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and S. J. Ross. 2007. “Multiple Questions in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (11): 2045–2070. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and S. J. Youn. 2018. “Transforming Instruction to Activity: Roleplay in Language Assessment.” Applied Linguistics Review 9 (4): 589–616. doi:10.1515/applirev-2017-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. 2016. “Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Being a Story Recipient in L2 English Conversation.” Discourse and Cognition 23 (1): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kley, K. 2019. “What Counts as Evidence for Interactional Competence? Developing Rating Criteria for a German Classroom-Based Paired Speaking Test.” In Teaching and Testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging Theory and Practice, edited by M. R. Salaberry and S. Kunitz, 291–321. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kley, K., K. Kunitz, and M. Yeh. 2021. “Is It California? Operationalizing Repair in Classroom-Based Assessment.” In Assessing Speaking in Context: Expanding the Construct and Its Applications, edited by M. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch, 165–191. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828-008.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. 1999. “Simulating Conversations in Oral-Proficiency Assessment: A Conversation Analysis of Role Plays and Non-Scripted Interviews in Language Exams.” Language Testing 16 (2): 163–188. doi:10.1177/026553229901600203.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. 1986. “From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence.” The Modern Language Journal 70 (4): 366–372. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, D. M. K. 2018. “What Counts as “Responding”? Contingency on Previous Speaker Contribution as a Feature of Interactional Competence.” Language Testing 35 (3): 377–401. doi:10.1177/0265532218758126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. A., and J. Hellermann. 2014. “Tracing Developmental Changes Through Conversation Analysis: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (4): 763–788. doi:10.1002/tesq.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, J. 2013. “Storytelling in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 492–507. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch24.
   Google Scholar
• May, L. 2009. “Co-Constructed Interaction in a Paired Speaking Test: The Rater’s Perspective.” Language Testing 26 (3): 397–421. doi:10.1177/0265532209104668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, L. 2011. “Interactional Competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features Salient to Raters.” Language Assessment Quarterly 8 (2): 127–145. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.565845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, L., F. Nakatsuhara, D. Lam, and E. D. Galaczi. 2020. “Developing Tools for Learning Oriented Assessment of Interactional Competence: Bridging Theory and Practice.” Language Testing 37 (2): 165–188. doi:10.1177/0265532219879044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2018. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, Y. 2010. “Role-Play in Oral Proficiency Interviews: Interactive Footing and Interactional Competencies.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1647–1668. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. 2019. “On the Nature and the Development of L2 Interactional Competence.” In Teaching and Testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging Theory and Practice, edited by M. R. Salaberry and S. Kunitz, 25–59. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Berger. 2018. “L2 Interactional Competence as Increased Ability for Context-Sensitive Conduct: A Longitudinal Study of Story-Openings.” Applied Linguistics 39 (4): 555–578. doi:10.1093/applin/amw021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2015. “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, edited by T. Cadierno and S. W. Eskildsen, 233–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110378528-012.
   Google Scholar
• Roever, C., and D. W. Dai. 2021. “Reconceptualizing Interactional Competence for Language Testing in Assessing Speaking in Context.” In Expanding the Construct and Its Applications, edited by M. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch, 23–49. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828-003.
   Google Scholar
• Roever, C., and N. Ikeda. 2022. “What Scores from Monologic Speaking Tests Can(not) Tell Us About Interactional Competence.” Language Testing 39 (1): 7–29. doi:10.1177/02655322211003332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roever, C., and G. Kasper. 2018. “Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking.” Language Testing 35 (3): 331–355. doi:10.1177/0265532218758128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaberry, M. R., A. R. Burch. 2021. Assessing Speaking in Context: Expanding the Construct and Its Applications. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828.
   Google Scholar
• Salaberry, M. R., S. Kunitz. 2019. Teaching and Testing L2 Interactional Competence: Bridging Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315177021.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund, E. 2022. “Telling in a Test: Storytelling and Task Accomplishment in L2 Oral Proficiency Assessment.” In Storytelling Practices in Home and Educational Contexts, edited by A. Filipi, B. T. Ta, and M. Theobald, 175–200. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9955-9_10.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund, E., and P. Sundqvist. 2021. “Rating and Reflecting: Displaying Rater Identities in Collegial L2 English Oral Assessment.” In Assessing Speaking in Context. Expanding the Construct and Its Applications, edited by M. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch, 132–161. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781788923828-007.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., and H. Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005a. “Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187. doi:10.1017/S0261444805003010.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005b. “‘Task‘ as Research Construct.” Language Learning 55 (3): 533–570. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K., and U. Balaman. 2018. “L2 interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time.” Language and Linguistics Compass 12 (8): 1–12. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781849208895.
   Google Scholar
• Tominaga, W. 2013. “The Development of Extended Turns and Storytelling in the Japanese Oral Proficiency Interview.” In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, edited by S. J. Ross and G. Kasper, 220–257. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Uyar, G., and U. Balaman in review. (in review). “The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks.“
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and C. Roever. 2021. “Proficiency and Preference Organization in Second Language Mandarin Chinese Refusals.” The Modern Language Journal 105 (4): 897–918. doi:10.1111/modl.12736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. J. 2015. “Validity Argument for Assessing L2 Pragmatics in Interaction Using Mixed Methods.” Language Testing 32 (2): 199–225. doi:10.1177/0265532214557113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. J. 2020a. “Managing Proposal Sequences in Role-Play Assessment: Validity Evidence of Interactional Competence Across Levels.” Language Testing 37 (1): 76–106. doi:10.1177/0265532219860077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. J. 2020b. “Pragmatic Variables in Role-Play Design for the Context Validity of Assessing Interactional Competence.” Papers in Language Testing and Assessment 9 (1): 95–127. doi:10.58379/CZPW6475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar