References
- Aricha-Metzer, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2019). The nature of students’ productive and non-productive example-use for proving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 304–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.09.002
- Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273371
- Cirillo, M., & Hummer, J. (2021). Competencies and behaviors observed when students solve geometry proof problems : An interview study with smartpen technology what components of proof are difficult for students and. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01221-w
- Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Conner, K. A., & Otten, S. , in press General Proof Tasks Provide Opportunities for Varied Forms of Reasoning Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education .
- Dawkins, P. C., & Karunakaran, S. S. (2016). Why research on proof-oriented mathematical behavior should attend to the role of particular mathematical content. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 44, 65–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.10.003
- Dimmel, J. K., & Herbst, P. G. (2015). The semiotic structure of geometry diagrams: How textbook diagrams convey meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 147–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0147
- Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2002). Analyzing geometry problematic learning situations by theory of perception. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 400–407). PME.
- Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). Information Age Publishing.
- Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students‘ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In Schoenfeld, A. H., Kaput, J., and Dubinsky, E.) Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, III (Providence, RI: Mathematical Association of America), 234–283.
- Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/749651
- Herbst, P. G., & Brach, C. (2006). Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: What is it that is going on for students? Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 73–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_2
- Herbst, P. G. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020264906740
- Hoyles, C., & Healy, L. (2000). Curriculum change and geometrical reasoning. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 81–115). Sense Publishers.
- Jansen, A. (2020). Rough draft math: Revising to learn. Stenhouse Publishers.
- Karaman, R. (2017). High school students’ interpretation and use of diagrams in geometry proofs. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri]. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/66727
- Knuth, E. J., Choppin, J., & Bieda, K. N. (2009). Middle school students’ production of mathematical justifications. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. 153–170). Routledge.
- Krejci, B., & Conner, K. , 2021. Developing students‘ understanding of proof through revising proofs based on peer critiques Proceedings of the forty-first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Philadelphia, PA Olanoff, D., Johnson, K., and Spitzer, S.M. (PMENA)1306–1310 .
- Lee, K. (2016). Students’ proof schemes for mathematical proving and disproving of propositions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 26–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.005
- Martin, T. S., McCrone, S. M. S., Bower, M. L. W., & Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-6698-0
- Mason, J. (2019). Relationships between proof and examples: Comments arising from the papers in this issue. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 339–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.005
- McCrone, S. S., & Martin, T. S. (2009). Formal proof in high school geometry: Student perceptions of structure, validity and purpose (D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth, Eds.). Teaching and Learning Proof Across the Grades: A K-16 Perspective (pp. 204–221). Routledge.
- Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational studies in mathematics, 94, 223–239 doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9.
- Otten, S., Gilbertson, N. J., Males, L. M., & Clark, D. L. (2014). The mathematical nature of reasoning-and-proving opportunities in geometry textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.857802
- Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Reid, D. A., & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in mathematics education: Research, learning and teaching. Sense Publishers.
- Reid, D. A. (2011). Understanding Proof and Transforming Teaching. In L. R. Weist & T. Lamberg (Eds.), 33rd annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 15–30). University of Nevada.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321 doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30034869.
- Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Stylianides, G. J. (2008). An analytic framework of reasoning and proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 9–16 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248592.
- Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge university press.
- van Oers, H. J. M. (1996). Learning mathematics as a meaningful activity. In Steffe, L. P., Nesher, P., Cobb, P., Sriraman, B., and Greer, B. Theories of Mathematical Learning (1st ed., 91–115). : Routledge.
- Waring, S. (2000). Can you prove it: Developing concepts of proof in primary and secondary schools. The Mathematical Association.
- Yackel, E., and Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 27 (4), 458–477 https://www.jstor.org/stable/749877
- Yee, S. P., Boyle, J. D., Ko, -Y.-Y., Winnie, Y., & Bleiler-Baxter, S. K. (2018). Effects of constructing, critiquing, and revising arguments within university classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.009
- Zwiers, J., Dieckmann, J., Rutherford-Quach, S., Daro, V., Skarin, R., Weiss, S., & Malamut, J. (2017). Principles for the design of mathematics curricula: Promoting language and content development. https://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/u6232/ULSCALE_ToA_Principles_MLRs__Final_v2.0_030217.pdf