Fostering a Student’s Abstraction of the Relationship Between Parallelogram and Trapezoid Within Quadrilateral Hierarchy

References

• Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (2008). Development of the shape makers geometry microworld. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 131–156). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (2012). Shape makers: Developing geometric reasoning in middle school with the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Key Curriculum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro, L., & Menghini, M. (2006). From geometrical figures to definitional rigour: Teachers’ analysis of teaching units mediated through van Hiele theory. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556711
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education – Mathematics education library (Vol. 2, pp. 243–307). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4504-3_7
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 68–95). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Craine, T. V., & Rubenstein, R. N. (1993). A quadrilateral hierarchy to facilitate learning in geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 86(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.86.1.0030
   Google Scholar
• Davison, I. (2003). Using an interactive whiteboard to facilitate pupil understanding of quadrilateral definitions. In S. Pope (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 13–18). Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. T., & Harper, S. R. (2010). Paint bucket polygons. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(7), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.7.0420
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. V., Corpuz, E. G., Ozimek, D. J., & Rebello, N. S. (2004). The teaching experiment- what it is and what it isn’t. In M. Jeffrey, S. Franklin, & K. Cummings (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 720, pp. 157–160). AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, M. M., & Yerushalmy, M. (2006). “If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle … .” Young students experience the dragging tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-006-9106-7
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, S. K. (2015). Dragging maintaining symmetry: Can it generate the concept of inclusivity as well as a family of shapes? Research in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1065757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520167
   Google Scholar
• Gal, H., & Lew, H. C. (2008). Is a rectangle a parallelogram? Towards a bypass of Van hiele level 3 decision making. In H. N. Jahnke & H. C. Lew (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education (Vol.18, pp. 34–48). Mexico: Monterrey.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. The American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.53.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürhan, S. (2015). Middle school students’ development of conceptual understanding of classifying quadrilaterals within technology-supported environments. ( YÖK Thesis No: 418784) Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=NTBlrFAlNj77SsnnVJre_g&no=QaU4VVoF8OzVARLrRv-mOA
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackiw, N. (1995). The geometer’s sketchpad [Computer software]. Key Curriculum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–3), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012789201736
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: The journey continues (pp. 109–149). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, H. (2015). Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles: Prototypicality and inclusion. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0658-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200105
   Google Scholar
• Kokol-Voljc, V. (2007). Use of mathematical software in pre-service teacher training: The case of DGS. In D. Küchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 55–60). The University of Northampton.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2019). Task design principles for heuristic refutation in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9892-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2020). Interplay between paper-and-pencil activity and dynamic-geometry-environment use during generalisation and proving. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00067-3
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K., & White, T. (2012). Exploring quadrilaterals in a small group computing environment. Computers and Education, 59(3), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, I. K. C. (2008). Teaching and learning of inclusive and transitive properties among quadrilaterals by deductive reasoning with the aid of SmartBoard. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0159-z
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Real, F., & Leung, A. (2006). Dragging as a conceptual tool in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(6), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600712539
   Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maschietto, M., & Soury Lavergne, S. (2013). Designing a duo of material and digital artifacts: The pascaline and cabri elem e-books in primary school mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 959–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0533-3
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Molitoris Miller, S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ abilities and learning processes involving the composition of definitions of quadrilaterals (Publication No. 3598717) [ Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware]. ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Database.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010) . Common core state standards for mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Öztoprakçı, S. (2014). Pre-Service middle school mathematics teachers’ understanding of quadrilaterals through the definitions and their relationships (Publication No: 386000) [ Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Thesis Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pegg, J. (2014). The van hiele theory. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_183
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction R.L. Campell, ( Trans.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800509
   Google Scholar
• Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2013). Conceptual learning in a principled design problem solving environment. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.836379
   Google Scholar
• Senk, S. L. (1989). van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/749519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., Saldanha, L., McClintock, E., Karagoz-Akar, G., Watanabe, T., & Zembat, I. O. (2010). A developing approach to studying students’ learning through their mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 28(1), 70–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000903430566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M., Mamolo, A., & Whiteley, W. J. (2011). Designing spatial visual tasks for research: The case of the filling task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(2), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9315-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmallVideoSoft. (2015). Freez screen video capture (version 1.2) [computer software]. https://freez-screen-video-capture.en.softonic.com
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trocki, A., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2018). The development of a framework for assessing dynamic geometry task quality. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 4, 110–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0041-8
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of National Education. (2018) . Matematik dersi öğretim programı. TTKB.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department for Education. (2013). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1-4. UK Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381344/Master_final_national_curriculum_28_Nov.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z., & Griffin, J. (2008). The classification of quadrilaterals: A study of definition. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Way, J. (2011). Developing fraction sense using digital learning objects (Chapter 15). In J. Way & J. Bobis (Eds.), Fractions: Teaching for understanding (pp. 153–166). The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT).
   Google Scholar
• Zembat, I. O. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ use of different types of mathematical reasoning in paper-and-pencil versus technology-supported environments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(2), 143–160.
   Google Scholar