Enabling stakeholder participation in marine spatial planning: the Bangladesh experience

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969, July). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaduzzaman, M., & Jinia, N. J. (2015). Relations between Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and government in Bangladesh. In A. Nurmandi, R. Sataporn, E. P. Purnomo, & A. W. Tamronglak (Eds.), Citizen participation in selected local governance of Asia Pacific countries (pp. 1–20). JK School of Government Tamantir to, Yogyakarta Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Bangladesh-India Arbitration. (2014, July 7). In the matter of the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of India, Award. https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/18/. [hereinafter the Bangladesh-India Case]
   Google Scholar
• Bari, A. (2017). Our oceans and the blue economy: Opportunities and challenges. Procedia Engineering, 5–11, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.109.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, H. W. (1985). Participation, public policy, political economy and development in Rural Bangladesh, 1958-85. World Development, 13(12), 1231–1247. Pergamon press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• BOBLME. (2011). Status of marine protected areas and fish refugia in the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem. BOBLME-2011-Ecology-10.
   Google Scholar
• BOBLME. (2015). An ecosystem characterisation of the Bay of Bengal. Compiled by Brewer, D., Hayes, D., Lyne, V., Donovan, A., Skewes, T., Milton, D. & Murphy, N. BOBLME-2015-Ecology-13. xvii+287p.
   Google Scholar
• CBD. (2004, February 9–12). Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its seventh meeting (COP7). Strategic Plan: future evaluation of progress. COP/VII/30. https://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/?m=cop-07
   Google Scholar
• CBD. (2010). Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. (1998). Spinning the wheel of empowerment. Plann, 1262, 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2003/35/EC. Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0089&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2014/89/EU. Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0089&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning, a step-by-step approach towards ecosystem-based management, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. Paris: UNESCO. 2009 (English), pp. 1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Espoo Convention. (1991). Convention on environmental impact assessment in a Transboundary Context, Espoo, Finland, 25 February 1991, CHAPTER XXVII. Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., Ellis, G., Ellis, G., Flannery, W., Nursey-Bray, M., van Tatenhove, J. P., Kelly, C., Coffen-Smout, S., Fairgrieve, R., Knol, M., & Jentoft, S. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/marine spatial planning: Cui bono?/“more than fishy business”: Epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/marine spatial planning: Power and scaping/surely not all planning is evil?/marine spatial planning: A Canadian perspective/maritime spatial planning–“ad utilitatem omnium”/marine spatial planning: “It is better to be on the train than being hit by it”/reflections from the perspective of recreational anglers and boats for hire/maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, M., Fieseler, C., Cantral, L., McClellan, K., Pendleton, L., & Crowder, L. (2012). Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 36(5), 1139–1149. ISSN 0308-597X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, D., & Alam, A. (2019). Marine spatial planing and the great barrier reef marine park act 1975: An evaluation. Ocean and Coastal Management, 167, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. S., Chowdhury, S. R., Navera, U. K., Hossain, M., Imam, B., & Sharifuzzaman, S. M. (2014). Opportunities and strategies for ocean and river resources management. Background Paper for Preparation of the 7th Five Year Plan Planning Commission, Ministry of Planning, Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. S., Chowdhury, S. R., Sharifuzzaman, S. M., & Sarker, S. (2015). IUCN: Vulnerability of the Bay of Bengal to Ocean Acidification. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2015-049.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. G., Failler, P., Karim, A. A., & Alam, M. K. (2018). Major opportunities of blue economy development in Bangladesh. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 14(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2017.1368250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). (2012). Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v Myanmar) (Judgment) International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Case no.16, 14 March 2012. http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_16/1-C16_Judgment_14_02_2012.pdf [Bangladesh-Myanmar Case]
   Google Scholar
• IOC/INF-1379. (2019). Progress in the implementation of the Integrated Coastal Area Management (ICAM) Strategy, including Marine Spatial Planning, Sustainable Blue Economy and Large Marine Ecosystems. http://ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=24769
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2019). Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. S. (2003). Perspectives of the coastal and marine fisheries of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46(8), 763–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00064-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. M., & Shamsuddoha, M. (2018). Coastal and marine conservation strategy for Bangladesh in the context of achieving blue growth and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Environmental Science and Policy, 87, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, B. L. (2004). Stakeholder participation: A synthesis of current literature. 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990100200203
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2020). Intensifying offshore drilling for Hydrocarbon. The Financial Express. https://www.thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/columns/intensifying-offshore-drilling-for-hydrocarbon-1578759813
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (2011). Bangladesh politics, Economy and civil society (pp. 75–134). London School of Economics and Political Science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannan, M. S. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning of Bangladesh. World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations.The maritime commons: Digital repository of the world maritime university. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/1172.
   Google Scholar
• Maritime Policy Green Paper. (2006). Commission green paper: Towards a future Maritime Policy for the Union: A European vision for the oceans and seas [COM (2006) 275 final - Not published in the Official Journal]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l66029&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2018). Press release: Press Statement of the Hon’ble Foreign Minister on the Potential of blue economy. http://www.mofa.gov.bd/
   Google Scholar
• Mutahara, M., Warner, J. M., & Khan, M. S. A. (2020). Multi-stakeholder participation for sustainable delta management: A challenge of the socio-technical transformation in the management practices in Bangladesh. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1722278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Water Policy. (1999). Ministry of Water Resources. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Panday, P. B. (2019). Public participation in local governments in Bangladesh: Experience, challenges and the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2019.1626060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentz, T.-A. (2012). BaltSeaPlan report 24, Baltic Sea region programme 2007–2013, Project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), pp. 1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32(5), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada-Silvaa, M., Iglesias-Campos, A., Turra, A., & Suárez-de Vivero, J. L. (2019). Stakeholder participation assessment framework (SPAF): A theory-based strategy to plan and evaluate marine spatial planning participatory processes. Marine Policy, 108. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. R. (2017). Blue economy and maritime cooperation in the Bay of Bengal: Role of Bangladesh. Procedia Engineering, 194, 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.157
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath, V. (2003). National report of India. Unpublished report prepared for the BOBLME Programme. Unedited version. www.BOBLME.org
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, C. H. (2019). An incomplete maritime map: Progress and challenges in the delimitation of maritime boundaries in South East Asia. In D. Rothwell & D. Letts (Eds.), Law of the Sea in South East Asia: Environmental, navigational and security challenges (pp. 33–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz-Zehden, A., & Gee, K. (2015). Towards a multi-level governance framework for MSP in the Baltic. Bulletin of the Maritime Institute of Gdansk, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.5604/12307424.1196267.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuzzaman, M. M., & Islam, M. M. (2018). Analysing the legal framework of marine living resources management in Bangladesh: Towards achieving sustainable development goal 14. Marine Policy, 87, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terryn, E., Boelens, L., & Pisman, A. (2016). Beyond the divide: Evaluation in co-evolutionary spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1079–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1154019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. I., Islam, M. R., Awal, Z. I., & Newaz, K. M. S. (2017). An analysis of accidents in the inland waterways of Bangladesh: Lessons from a decade (2005-2015). Procedia Engineering, 194, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.148
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. N., Rahman, M. A., Mofijur, M., Taweekun, J., Techato, J., & Rasul, M. G. (2019). Renewable energy in Bangladesh: Status and prospects. Energy Procedia, 160, 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.218
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1982). United nations convention on the law of the sea.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1992). United nations sustainable development, Agenda 21, Rio de Janeiro. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). Sustainable development goals, goal 14. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/
   Google Scholar
• UN SDG [Sustainable Development Goal] 14. (2019). Targets and indicators. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg14
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. (2014). The key to governing the fragile Baltic Sea. VASAB Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., & Gee, K. (2019). Maritime spatial planning past, present, future (pp. 219–270). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar