When documentation becomes feedback: tensions in feedback activity in Learning Management Systems

References

• Annerberg, A. (2016). Gymnasielärares skrivpraktiker: Skrivande som professionell handling i en digitaliserad skola [High school teacher’s writing practice. Writing as a professional act in a digitalized school] [Doctoral dissertation]. Örebro universitet. Retrieved from http://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1050918/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers‘ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M. (2015). Deltagande netnografi [Participatory netnography]. In I. I. G. Ahrne & P. Svensson (Eds.), Handbok i kvalitativa metoder [Handbook of qualitative methods], 142-156. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). Alexandria: ACDC.
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. (2009). A sociocultural reflection on formative assessment and collaborative challenges in the states of Jersey. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Ræbild, L. (2017). Fremtidsværksted, brugerindflydelse og ejerskab – Om at understøtte det pædagogiske personales ejerskab og fagligt pædagogiske lederskab i brug af Læringsplatforme: Delrapport 2 inom projektet Anvendelse af digitale læringsplatforme og læremidler. Aalborg: Aalborg University CPH. [Sub-report 2 within the project Use of digital learning platforms and teaching aids]. Retrieved from https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/272648012/Delrapport2_280417.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity‐theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta‐Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practices and the role of IT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181–194). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, A. (2019). Återkoppling i analoga och digitala klassrum: Spänningsfyllda verksamheter i samhällskunskapsundervisning [Feedback in Analogous and Digital Classrooms: Tensional activities in Social Stucies Instruction] [Doctoral dissertation]. Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Ivarsson, J. (2020). Brave new platforms: A possible platform future for highly decentralised schooling. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, Å., & Lindberg, V. (2015). Formativ bedömning på 2000-talet: En översikt av svensk och internationell forskning [Formative assessment in the 2000s: An overview of Swedish and international research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta‐analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview]. (3. rev. uppl). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 2538.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1977/1986). Verksamhet, medvetande, personlighet [Activity, consciousness, and personality]. Moskva: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, O. J., Olofsson, A., & Fransson, G. (2017). Same but different? An examination of Swedish upper secondary school teachers’ and students’ views and use of ICT in education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(2), 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochner, B., Conrad, R.-M., & Graham, E. (2015). Secondary teachers’ concerns in adopting learning management systems: A U.S. perspective. TechTrends, 59(5), 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårell-Olsson, E. (2012). Att göra lärandet synligt? Individuella utvecklingsplaner och digital dokumentation [Making learning visible? Individual development plans and digital documentation] [Doctoral dissertation]. Umeå universitet. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:552174/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Misfeldt, M., Tamborg, A., Qvortrup, A., Kølsen Petersen, C., Svensson Ørsted, K., Brink Allsopp, B., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2018). Implementering af læringsplatforme: Brug, værdier og samarbejde [Implementation of learning platforms: Use, values and collaboration]. Læring & Medier, 10, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, O. J., Fransson, G., & Hauge, T. E. (2015). Uptake and use of digital technologies in primary and secondary schools: A thematic review of research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, R. (2016). Samhällskunskap som ämnesförståelse och undervisningsämne: Prioriteringar och nyhetsanvändning hos fyra gymnasielärare [Social sciences as subject understanding and teaching subject: Priorities and news use in four upper secondary school teachers] [Doctoral dissertation]. Karlstads universitet. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:902572/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, J., Brismark, A., & Löfgren, H. (2018). Papperspedagoger: Lärares arbete med administration i digitaliseringens tidevarv. [Paper educators: Teachers’ work with administration in the age of digitalisation] (IFAU rapport 2018:5). Uppsala: IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). ‘It’s all about standardisation’ – Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2016). It-användning och it-kompetens i skolan [IT use and IT skills in school] [Elektronisk resurs]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2018). Betyg och betygssättning [Grades and grading]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stödberg, U., & Håkansson Lindqvist, M. (2017). A municipal implementation of a new learning management system in K-12 schools: The teacher perspective. International Conference for Information Communication Technologies in Education, ICICTE Proceedings juli 2017, Rhodes, Greece, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, B., & Hansen, C. (2014). Making use of ICT: Glimpses from Norwegian teacher practices. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(1), 44–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsey, T. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311–329.
   Google Scholar