1,569
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

In the grey zone: large-scale assessment-based activities betwixt and between policy, research and practice

, &
Pages 29-41 | Received 15 Aug 2016, Accepted 25 Mar 2017, Published online: 20 Apr 2017

References

  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. Chicago, IL: McKinsey & Company.
  • Barber, M., & Rizvi, S. (2013a). Asking more: The path to efficacy. New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Barber, M., & Rizvi, S. (2013b). The incomplete guide to delivering learner outcomes. New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bloom, B. (1969). Cross-national study of educational attainment: Stage I of the IEA investigation in six subject areas. Final report. Volume I. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Systems of education and systems of thought. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions in the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.
  • Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. Hoboken: Routledge.
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 172–188. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172
  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible college: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Desrosières, A. (1991). How to make things which hold together: Social science, statistics and the state. Dordrecht: Discourses on society. Springer Netherlands.
  • Foshay, A. W., Thorndike, R. L., Hotyat, F., Pidgeon, D. A., & Walker, D. A. (1962). Educational achievements of 13 year olds in twelve countries. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute of Education.
  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
  • Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hacking, I. (1992). “Style” for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 23(1), 1–20. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(92)90024-Z
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Schooling, educational achievement, and the Latin American growth puzzle. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 497–512. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.06.004
  • Hogan, A., Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2015). Edu-business and education policy: The case of Pearson. Professional Voice, 10(2), 24–30.
  • Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 243–258. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1112922
  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1948). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt: S. Fischer Verlag.
  • Igo, S. E. (2007). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens, and the making of mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Princeton, NJ: Harvard University.
  • Kazamias, A. M. (2009). Forgotten men, forgotten themes: The historical-philosophical-cultural and liberal humanist motif in comparative education. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), Second international handbook of comparative education (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Knorr Cetina, K., & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science. The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, IL: Princeton University Press.
  • Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. (2015). International comparisons of school results: A systematic review of research on large scale assessments in education. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådets rapporter.
  • Lussi Borer, V., & Lawn, M. (2013). Governing education systems by shaping data: From the past to the present, from national to international perspectives. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 48–52. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.48
  • Martens, K. (2007). How to become an influential actor – The “comparative turn” in OECD education policy. In K. Martens, A. Rusconi, & K. Lutz (Eds.), Transformations of the state and global governance. London: Routledge.
  • McCall, W. (1922). How to measure in education? New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. Chicago, IL: McKinsey & Company.
  • Mourshed, M., Farrell, D., & Barton, D. (2013). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. Chicago, IL: McKinsey & Company.
  • Nóvoa, A., & Lord, M. (Eds.). (2002). Fabricating Europe: The formation of an education space. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Owens, T. L. (2013). Thinking beyond league tables: A review of key PISA research questions. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education; 23:1. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Pearson. (2012). Annual report and accounts. Retrieved from http://www.pearson.com/content/dam/pearsoncorporate/files/cosec/2013/15939_PearsonAR12.pdf
  • Pearson, Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). The learning curve: Lessons in country performance in education. New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Pettersson, D. (2008). Internationell kunskapsbedömning som inslag i nationell styrning av skolan (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala Studies in Education No 120). Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
  • Pettersson, D. (2014a). The development of the IEA: The rise of large-scale testing. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational policy-flows in European education: Conceptualizing and governing knowledge. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education. East Greenwich: Symposium Books.
  • Pettersson, D. (2014b). Three narratives: National interpretations of PISA. Knowledge Cultures, 2(4), 25–45.
  • Pettersson, D., Popkewitz, T. S., & Lindblad, S. (2016). On the use of educational numbers: Comparative constructions of hierarchies by means of large-scale assessments. Espacio, Tiempo y Education, 3(1), 177–202. doi:10.14516/ete.2016.003.001.10
  • Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2015). Curriculum studies, the reason of “reason”, and schooling. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The “reason” of schooling: Historicizing curriculum studies, pedagogy, and teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Porter, T. M. (2012). Funny numbers. Culture Unbound, 4, 585–598. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124585
  • Postlethwaite, N., & Ross, K. N. (1992). Effective schools in reading: Implications for educational planners: An exploratory study. The Hague: IEA.
  • Purves, A. C. (1987). The evolution of the IEA: A memoir. Comparative Education Review, 31(1), 10–28. doi:10.1086/446653
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ross, K. N., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (1991). Indicators of the quality of education: A national study of primary schools in Zimbabwe. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Sapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schleicher, A., & Saito, M. (1995). Data building and data management. Paris: IIEP.
  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Smeyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2010). Representation or hard evidence? The use of statistics in education and educational research. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: The ethics and aesthetics of statistics. Educational Research 5. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Stigler, S. M. (1992). A historical view of statistical concepts in psychology and educational research. American Journal of Education, 101, 60–70. doi:10.1086/444032
  • Supreme Court of Minnesota. (1919). Cohen vs. Whitcomb 1919:142, Minnesota 20 (the citation is retrieved August 17, 2016, from a description of appurtenance from the website: http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/A/Appurtenance.aspx)
  • Uwezo. (2014). Are our children learning? Literacy and numeracy across East Africa 2013. Nairobi: Author.
  • Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). The emergence and structuring of the global education industry: Towards an analytical framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry. New York, NY: Routledge.