Using school websites for home–school communication and parental involvement?

References

• Adams, K. S., & Christenson, S. L. (2000). Trust and the family–school relationship examination of parent–teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38(5), 477–497. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(00)00048-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L., Castaneda, R., & Koraleck, R. (2006). Using the Internet to provide ethic and culturally diverse populations with high-quality child support information - The case of the beehive. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/research/publication/using-internet-provide-ethnic-and-culturally-diverse-populations-high-quality-child-support-information/view/full_report
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. (2009). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family and community partnerships. In F. C. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), Handbook for research education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, L. (2011). Vad betyder föräldrarätten i relation till principer för relationen mellan föräldrar och skola? In T. Englund (Ed.), Utbildning som medborgerlig rättighet. Föräldrarätt, barns rätt eller…? (pp. 211–240). Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, L. (2012). Den goda läraren på föräldraarenan. In T. Englund (Ed.), Föreställningar om den goda läraren (pp. 157–178). Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Flessa, J. (2011). Parental involvement: What counts it, and does it help? Education Canada, 48(2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, A. (2010). Marknaden och lärarna – Hur organiseringen av skolan påverkar lärares offentliga tjänstemannaskap. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, J. S. (2016). Technology and school-home communication. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(2), 118–131. doi:10.1080/22040552.2016.1227252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L. (2011). ‘I’m a completely different person at home’: Using digital technologies to connect learning between home and school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 292–302. doi:10.1111/jca.2011.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50(3), 277–289. doi:10.1080/00131880802309424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshore, R., Friedman, A., Algozzine, B., & Kaur, D. (2008). Analysis of elementary school websites. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2010). Web content analysis: Expanding the paradigm. In J. Hunsinger, M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), The international handbook of internet research (pp. 233–249). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L.-H., Hung, C.-L., & Chen, H.-C. (2013). Using theoretical models to examine the acceptance behavior of mobile phone messaging to enhance parent-teacher interactions. Computers & Education, 61, 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63(1), 37–52. doi:10.1080/00131911.2010.488049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet Foundation in Sweden. (2016). The Swedes and the internet 2016. Retrieved from https://www.iis.se/english/blog/the-swedes-and-the-internet-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, D. A. (2007). Using classroom newsletters as a vehicle for examining home‐school connections. Teaching Education, 18(2), 167–178. doi:10.1080/10476210701325283
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, L., & Lipper, W. (2005). Measuring digital opportunity for America’s children: Where we stand and where we go from here. Santa Monica, CA: The Children’s Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, C., & Luckin, R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54, 749–758. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517. doi:10.3402/edui.v4i3.22620
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Adsit, K., & Miller, T. (2005). Evaluating the importance of common components in school-based websites: Frequency of appearance and stakeholders’ judged value. TechTrends, 49(6), 34–41. doi:10.1007/BF02763728
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, O., & Sefyrin, J. (2005). Vardagskommunikation skola-hem, föräldrars uppfattningar nuläge och vision (Delrapport 1). Sundsvall kommun: Mittuniversitetet Sundsvall.
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, C. (2013). Using technology to increase parent involvement in schools. Tech Trends, 57, 28–37. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0699-0
   Google Scholar
• Parajuli, J. (2007). A content analysis of selected government web sites: A case study of Nepal. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 5(1), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., & Pearson, A. (2007). Determining the importance of key criteria in web usability. Management Research News, 30, 816–828. doi:10.1108/01409170710832250
   Google Scholar
• Poikolainen, J., & Silmäri-Salo, S. (2015). Contrasting school choice policies and parental choices in finnish case cities. In P. Seppänen, A. Carrasco, M. Kalalahti, R. Rinne, & H. Simola (Eds), Contrasting dynamics in education politics of extremes: School choice in Finland and Chile (pp. 224–225). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ravn, B. (2005). An ambiguous relationship: Challenges and controversies in the field of family-school-community partnership, questioning the discourse of partnership. In R. Martinez-Gonzáles, M. Henar Pérez-Herro, & B. Rodriguez Ruiz (Eds.), Family-school-community partnerships: Merging into social development (pp. 453–475); Oviedo: Grupo SM.
   Google Scholar
• Şad, S. N., Konca, A. S., Özer, N., & Acar, F. (2016). Parental e-nvolvement: A phenomenological research on electronic parental involvement. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(2), 163–186. doi:10.1080/22040552.2016.1227255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2011). Good research practice – What is it? Views, guidelines and examples. Retrieved from https://www.vr.se/download/18.3a36c20d133af0c1295800030/1340207445948/Good±Research±Practice±3.2011_webb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden SCB. (2017). Population in the state, counties and municipalities 31 December 2016 and population changes 1 July to 31 December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningens-sammansattning/befolkningsstatistik/
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg Broman, I. (2013). Föräldrasamverkan i förändring. In I. A. Harju & I. Tallberg Broman ( red.), Föräldrar, förskola och skola. Om mångfald, makt och möjligheter (pp. 25–39). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016). IT-användning och IT-kompetens i skolan. Retrieved from https://www.iis.se/docs/it-anvandning-skolverket-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. C., Mazer, J. P., & Flood Grady, E. (2015). The changing nature of parent–teacher communication: Mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64, 187–207. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1014382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar