Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance

References

• Addi-Raccah, A. (2015). School principals’ role in the interplay between the superintendents and local education authorities: The case of Israel. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2012-0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson, C.-H. (2013). Kunskapsfrågan – En läroplansteoretisk studie om gymnasieskolans reformer mellan 1960-talet och 2010-talet [The question of knowledge – A curriculum study of the Swedish upper secondary school reforms between the 1960s and 2010s] [Doctoral dissertation], Linnaeus UNiversity Press, Växjö .
   Google Scholar
• Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2017). The nested systems of local school development: Understanding improved interaction and capacities in the different sub-systems of schools. Improving Schools, 20(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217710874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvunger, D. (2015). Towards new forms of educational leadership? The local implementation of förstelärare in Swedish schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(3), 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30103
   Google Scholar
• Alvunger, D. (2018). Teachers’ curriculum agency in teaching a standards-based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1486721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., & Daly, A. J. (2013). Diversity in the middle: Broadening perspectives on intermediary levels of school system improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 51 (4), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325703
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 45–68). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., Sumara, D., & D’Amour, L. (2012). Understanding school districts as learning systems: Some lessons from three cases of complex transformation. Journal of Educational Change, 13(3), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9183-4
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Finnigan, K. S., Daly, A. J., Che, J., & Daly, A. J. (2013). Systemwide reform in districts under pressure: The role of social networks in defining, acquiring, using, and diffusing research evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325668
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., & Lundahl, C. (2012). Re/produktionen av kunskap i det svenska utbildningssystemet [Re/production of knowledge in the Swedish education system]. In T. Englund, E. Forsberg, & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Vad räknas som kunskap? Läroplansteoretiska utsikter och inblickar i lärarutbildning och skola [What counts as knowledge? Curriculum theory perspectives on teacher education and school] (pp. 200–224). Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010068703786
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S., Lawn, M., Lingard, J., Ozga, J., Rinne, R., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (2009). National policy brokering and the construction of the European Education Space in England, Sweden, Finland and Scotland. Comparative Education, 45(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802661378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Schwartz, H. L., Stecher, B. M., & Steele, J. L. (2013). Improving accountability through expanded measures of performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325659
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Russell, J. L., Marsh, J. A., & Miles, J. (2008). Accountability and teaching practices: School-level actions and teacher responses. Research in Sociology of Education, 16(1), 31–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L. Y., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höstfält, G., Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2017). The recontextualization of policy messages – The local authority as a policy actor. In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching (pp. 66–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2011). School Governance in Switzerland: Tensions between new roles and old traditions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211405349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European policy space in educational governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2002.1.2.6
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D. (2014). Curriculum regulation in England – Giving with one hand and taking away with the other. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., Livingston, K., & Priestley, M. (2013). Curriculum deregulation in England and Scotland: Different directions of travel? In K. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 229–248). SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Lindensjö, B., & Lundgren, U. P. (2014). Utbildningsreformer och politisk styrning. [Education reforms and political governance]. Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357
   Google Scholar
• Nordholm, D. (2016). State policy directives and middle-tier translation in a Swedish example. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2015-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2011). A systemic perspective on school reform: Principals’ and chief education officers’ perspectives on school development. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111102054
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested system for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10364671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risku, M., Kanervio, P., & Björk, L. G. (2014). Finnish superintendents: Leading in a changing education policy context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945653
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Dale, R. (2015). Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.967502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K. (2013). Districts, local education authorities, and the context of policy analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325695
   Google Scholar
• SFS (2010:800). Skollagen [The Swedish Education Act].
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 233–267). Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904896010001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2017). Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Collins, C. (2010). The absence of knowledge in Australian curriculum reforms. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar