Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance

References

• Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework (OECD Education Working Paper No. 187). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, N., & Hamakawa, Y. (2003). Asserting our culture: Teacher autonomy from a feminist perspective. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 240–253). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto, E. S. S. (2012). Curriculum and evaluation policies and teaching policies. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 42(147), 738–753.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A. (2015). Local educational actors doing of education: A study of how local autonomy meets international and national quality policy rhetoric. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2), 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, C. (2009). Local implementation of Japan’s integrated studies reform: A preliminary analysis of efforts to decentralise the curriculum. Comparative Education, 45(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802661386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camphuijsen, M. K., Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: Exploring drivers, expectations and strategies. Journal of Education Policy, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. H. (2016). Teacher autonomy within a flexible national curriculum: Development of Shoah (holocaust) education in Israeli state schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1033464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Flores, M. A., & Viana, I. (2007). Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: Findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760701486092
   Google Scholar
• Dias, V. C. (2018). Integral education program of São Paulo: Problematizations about the teaching work. Educação E Pesquisa, 44(e180303), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, J., & Nygren‑Landgärds, C. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of autonomy in the tensions between a subject focus and a cross‑curricular school profile: A case study of a Finnish upper secondary school. Journal of Educational Change.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erss, M. (2018). “Complete freedom to choose within limits”—Teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1445514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). “Walking a fine line”: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalization of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., Kılıçoğlu, D., & Kılıçoğlu, G. (2020). Does autonomy exist? Comparing the autonomy of teachers and senior leaders in England and Turkey. Oxford Review of Education, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90015-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2007). Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232
   Google Scholar
• Högberg, B., & Lindgren, J. (2020). Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries: A global policy model? Comparative Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2015). “Didaktik meets Curriculum” revisited: Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (2015(1), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imsen, G., & Volckmar, N. (2014). The Norwegian school for all: Historical emergence and neoliberal confrontation. In V. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model: “A school for all” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 33–55). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. D. (2004). Autonomy and accountability in the regulation of the teaching profession: A South African case study. Research Papers in Education, 19(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176972
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2011). Conceptualizing curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. In L. Yates & M. Grumet (Eds.), Curriculum in today’s world: Configuring knowledge, identities, work and politics (pp. 58–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions: A literature review. Zeitschrift fü r Pä dagogik, 52(2), 220–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskula, E., Loogma, K., Kolka, P., & Sau-Ek, K. (2012). Curriculum change in teachers’ experience: The social innovation perspective. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.712051
   Google Scholar
• Lennert da Silva, A. L., & Mølstad, C. E. (2020). Teacher autonomy and teacher agency: A comparative study in Brazilian and Norwegian lower-secondary education. Curriculum Journal, 31(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennert da Silva, A. L., & Parish, K. (2020). National curriculum policy in Norway and Brazil. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4(2), 64–83.
   Google Scholar
• Manzon, M. (2014). Comparing places. In M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 19, pp. 97–137). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. (2013). Reshaping teacher professionalism: An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increasing accountability. Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Granlund, L. (2012). Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ union. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.672656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Mølstad, C. E. (2015). Shifts in curriculum control: Contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (2015(2), 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Nerland, M., & Karseth, B. (2015). The knowledge work of professional associations: Approaches to standardisation and forms of legitimization. Journal of Education and Work, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2013.802833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Vol. II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, D., & Mølstad, C. E. (2016). PISA teachers: The hope and the happening of educational development. Educação E Sociedade, 37(136), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302016165509
   Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., & Wermke, W. (2020). Unpacking autonomy for empirical comparative investigation. Oxford Review of Education, 46(5), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1733514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalem, Y., De Clercq, F., Steinberg, C., & Koornhof, H. (2018). Teacher autonomy in times of standardised lesson plans: The case of a primary school language and mathematics intervention in South Africa. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9318-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, T. B. (2017). Work in progress: The political construction of the OECD Programme Teaching and Learning International Survey [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Bristol, EThOS. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.723502
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2003). The politics of league tables. Journal of Social Science Education, 2(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Cross-national policy borrowing: Understanding reception and translation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.875649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, M., Pupala, B., Kascak, O., & Arndt, S. (2017). Teachers’ voice, power and agency: (Un)professionalisation of the early years workforce. Early Years, 37(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1174671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, J., & Loiola, F. (2001). Experiência e competência no ensino: Pistas de reflexões sobre a natureza do saber-ensinar na perspectiva da ergonomia do trabalho docente [Teaching experience and competence: Reflecting on the nature of knowledge of teaching in the ergonomics perspective of teacher’s work]. Educação e Sociedade, Campinas, 12(73), 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., & Kyndt, E. (2019). The teacher as an island? A mixed method study on the relationship between autonomy and collaboration. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(1), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00420-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). National and international assessment in Brazil: The link between PISA and IDEB. Educação & Realidade, 43(4), 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623684893
   Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Forsberg, E. (2017). The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1119727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Prøitz, T. S. (2019). Discussing the curriculum-Didaktik dichotomy and comparative conceptualisations of the teaching profession. Education Inquiry, 10(4), 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1618677
   Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., Rick, S. O., & Salokangas, M. (2019). Decision-making and control: Perceived autonomy of teachers in Germany and Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Salokangas, M. (2021). The autonomy paradox: Teachers’ perceptions of self-governance across Europe. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Wilches, J. U. (2007). Teacher autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 12(18), 245–275.
   Google Scholar