Evaluating the implementation process of a new telerehabilitation modality in three rehabilitation settings using the normalization process theory: study protocol

References

• Brennan DM, Tindall L, Theodoros D, et al. A blueprint for telerehabilitation cuidelines – October 2010. Telemed J E-Health. 2011;17(8):662–665. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert NJ, van Os-Medendorp H, van Renselaar W, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):1–23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, et al. Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):281–287. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, et al. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(4):287–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorstyn D, Mathias J, Denson L. Applications of telecounselling in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a systematic review with effect sizes. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(12):1072–1083. doi: 10.1177/0269215513488001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatya B, Galea MP, Kesselring J, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Dis. 2015;4(4):358–369. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang R, Bruning J, Morris N, et al. A systematic review of the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2015;35(6):380–389. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000121
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Jin W, Zhang X-X, et al. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(12):2660–2668. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner AK, Wykstra SL, Yoshinaga PD, et al. Telerehabilitation for people with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD011019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(6):427–447. doi: 10.1080/09638280802062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairy D, Veras M, Archambault P, et al. Maximizing post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation using a novel telerehabilitation interactive virtual reality system in the patient's home: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;47:49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Atzori AM, et al. Virtual environment system for motor tele-rehabilitation. Stud Heal Technol Inform. 2002;85:355–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, et al. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Inform Internet. 2004;29(2):119–125. doi: 10.1080/14639230410001723428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giallauria F, Lucci R, Pilerci F, et al. Efficacy of telecardiology in improving the results of cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2006;66(1):8–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Körtke H, Stromeyer H, Zittermann A, et al. New East-Westfalian postoperative therapy concept: a telemedicine guide for the study of ambulatory rehabilitation of patients after cardiac surgery. Telemed J E-Health. 2006;12(4):475–483. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, et al. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(4):202–213. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15572201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson T, Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):1–6. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson R. European Union leads way on e-health, but obstacles remain. BMJ 2010;341:c5195. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A. Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair FS, May C, O’Donnell C, et al. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):357–364. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch TL, Mair FS, O’Donnell C, et al. From theory to ‘measurement’ in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Burns J, May C, et al. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molfenter T, Ford JH, Bhattacharya A. The development and use of a model to predict sustainability of change in healthcare settings. Int J Inf Sys Change Manage. 2011;5(1):22–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Heal 2011;38(1):4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltsey-Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, et al. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–554. doi: 10.1177/0038038509103208
   Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T, Mair F, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Rapley T, Mair FS, et al. Normalization process theory on-line users’ manual, toolkit and NoMAD instrument. 2015. Available from: http://www.normalizationprocess.org/
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, et al. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Rapley T, Mair FS, et al. Normalization process theory: bibliography of NPT studies. 2015. Available from: http://www.normalizationprocess.org/bibliography/
   Google Scholar
• Finch T. Teledermatology for chronic disease management: coherence and normalization. Chronic Illness. 2008;4(2):127–134. doi: 10.1177/1742395308092483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray E, Burns J, May C, et al. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovative Imaging Technologies, i. Reacts features. 2016. [cited 20 May 2]. Available from: https://www.iitreacts.com/Features
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Klasser AC, Plano Clark VL, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2011. [cited 2016 May 3]. Available from: https://obssr.od.nih.gov/training/mixed-methods-research/
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain P, Brown CH, Saldana L. Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC). Implement Sci 2011;6:116. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré E, Vincent C, Lehoux P, et al. Developing and validating the French-Canadian version of the practitioner and organizational telehealth readiness assessment tools. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):140–146. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994. p. 338.
   Google Scholar