References
- Agustin, D. (2019). Learning through critique: Intercultural awareness in student-supervisor feedback practices. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 251–263). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_21
- Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905–916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902785580
- Aitchison, C. (2014). Learning from multiple voices: Feedback and authority in doctoral writing groups. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 51–64). Routledge.
- Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (2014). Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory. Routledge.
- Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
- Bloome, D., & Green, J. (2015). The social and linguistic turns in studying language and literacy. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 19–34). Routledge.
- Bolotnyy, V., Basilico, M., & Barreira, P. (2021). Graduate student mental health: Lessons from American economics departments. Working paper. (https://www.valentinbolotnyy.com/files/BBB_GradMentalHealth.pdf
- Cahusac de Caux, B. K. C. D., Lam, C. K. C., Lau, R., Hoang, C. H., & Pretorius, L. (2017). Reflection for learning in doctoral training: Writing groups, academic writing proficiency and reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 18(4), 463–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1307725
- Can, G., & Walker, A. (2011). A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, 52(5), 508–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1
- Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 90–103). Routledge.
- Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
- Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37–55. http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/chakma.pdf
- Cutri, J., Abraham, A., Karlina, Y., Patel, S. V., Moharami, M., Zeng, S., Manzari, E., & Pretorius, L. (2021). Academic integrity at doctoral level: The influence of the imposter phenomenon and cultural differences on academic writing. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00074-w
- Ede, L. (1989). Writing as a social process: A theoretical foundation for writing centers? The Writing Center Journal, 9(2), 3–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43444122
- Edwards-Groves, C. (2018). The practice architectures of pedagogy: Conceptualising the convergences between sociality, dialogue, ontology and temporality in teaching practices. In O. Olga Bernad-Cavero & N. Llevot-Calvet (Eds.), New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century - contributions of research in education (pp. 119–139). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72920
- Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089
- Eyres, S. J., Hatch, D. H., Turner, S. B., & West, M. (2001). Doctoral students’ responses to writing critique: Messages for teachers. Journal of Nursing Education, 40(4), 149–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20010401-04
- Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101
- Giampapa, F. (2011). The politics of “being and becoming” a researcher: Identity, power, and negotiating the field. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.585304
- Guerin, C. (2014). The gift of writing groups: Critique, community and confidence. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 245–268). Routledge.
- Haas, S. (2014). Pick-n-mix: A typology of writers’ groups in use. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 30–47). Routledge.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Henderson, M., Boud, D., Molloy, E., Dawson, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., & Mahoney, P. (2018). Feedback for learning: Closing the assessment loop. Department of Education and Training.
- Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019). Conditions that enable effective feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807
- Hennessy, L. (2020). Re-thinking place: A post-human cartographical exploration of urban early childhood education in Melbourne city. Monash University. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/thesis/Re-thinking_Place_A_Post-Human_Cartographical_Exploration_of_Urban_Early_Childhood_Education_in_Melbourne_City/12830822
- Hoang, C. H., & Pretorius, L. (2019). Identity and agency as academics: Navigating academia as a doctoral student. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 143–151). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_12
- Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: Writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
- Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4
- Kozar, O., & Lum, J. F. (2015). Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference? Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003
- Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
- Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Sciences Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
- Lam, C. K. C., Hoang, C. H., Lau, R. W. K., Cahusac de Caux, B., Tan, Q. Q., Chen, Y., & Pretorius, L. (2019). Experiential learning in doctoral training programmes: Fostering personal epistemology through collaboration. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482863
- Lau, R. W. K., & Pretorius, L. (2019). Intrapersonal wellbeing and the academic mental health crisis. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 37–45). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_5
- Lau, R. W. K. (2019). You are not your PhD: Managing stress during doctoral candidature. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 47–58). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_6
- Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 25(6), 739–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
- Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058109
- Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
- Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
- Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
- Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). ‘Becoming and being writers’: The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370802439870
- Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
- Martinez, C. T., Kock, N., & Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: Factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(5), 351–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.5.5
- Min, H.-T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
- Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
- Molloy, E., Borrell-Carrio, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotions in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education - understanding it and doing it well (pp. 50–71). Routledge.
- Muhalim. (2019). Prospering in thesis writing: From self-reflexivity to ideological becoming. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 229–238). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_19
- Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
- Paul, A. D., Gilbert, K. M., & Remedios, L. (2013). Socio-cultural considerations in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education - understanding it and doing it well (pp. 72–89). Routledge.
- Pretorius, L., & Ford, A. (2016). Reflection for learning: Teaching reflective practice at the beginning of university study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 241–253. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE2142.pdf
- Pretorius, L., & Macaulay, L. (2021). Notions of human capital and academic identity in the PhD: Narratives of the disempowered. Journal of Higher Education, 92(4), 623–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1854605
- Pretorius, L., Macaulay, L., & Cahusac de Caux, B. (2019). Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0
- Rowsell, J., & Pahl, K. (2015). The Routledge handbook of literacy studies. Routledge.
- Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
- Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Street, B. V. (1994). What is meant by local literacies? Language and Education, 8(1–2), 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789409541372
- Wegener, C., Meier, N., & Ingerslev, K. (2016). Borrowing brainpower - sharing insecurities. Lessons learned from a doctoral peer writing group. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966671
- Wilson, S., & Cutri, J. (2019). Negating isolation and imposter syndrome through writing as product and as process: The impact of collegiate writing networks during a doctoral programme. In L. Pretorius, L. Macaulay, & B. Cahusac de Caux (Eds.), Wellbeing in doctoral education: Insights and guidance from the student experience (pp. 59–76). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_7
- Wilson, S., & Cutri, J. (2021). Novice academic roles: The value of collegiate, attendee-driven writing networks. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 149–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/4700
- Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education, 1(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268
- Woolston, C. (2017). Graduate survey: A love-hurt relationship. Nature, 550(7677), 549–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7677-549a
- Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
- Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417