Insights into the genetic and host adaptability of emerging porcine circovirus 3

References

• Ellis J. Porcine circovirus: a historical perspective. Vet Pathol. 2014;51(2):315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd D. Avian circovirus diseases: lessons for the study of PMWS. Vet Microbiol. 2004;98(2):169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Mcgraw S, Zhu K, et al. Circovirus in tissues of dogs with vasculitis and hemorrhage. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(4):534–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decaro N, Martella V, Desario C, et al. Genomic characterization of a circovirus associated with fatal hemorrhagic enteritis in dog, Italy. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexton S, Wiersma LC, Getu S, et al. Detection of circovirus in foxes with meningoencephalitis, United Kingdom, 2009–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(7):1205–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan TG, Giannitti F, Rossow S, et al. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol J. 2016;13(1):184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie J, Opriessnig T, Meng XJ, et al. Porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine circovirus‐associated disease. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23(6):1151–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinski R, Piñeyro P, Shang P, et al. A novel porcine circovirus distantly related to known circoviruses is associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome and reproductive failure. J Virol. 2016;91(1):JVI.01879–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fux R, Söckler C, Link EK, et al. Full genome characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 isolates reveals the existence of two distinct groups of virus strains. Virol J. 2018;15(1):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedkovid R, Woonwong Y, Arunorat J, et al. Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) infection in grower pigs from a Thai farm suffering from porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC). Vet Microbiol. 2018;215:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye X, Berg M, Fossum C, et al. Detection and genetic characterisation of porcine circovirus 3 from pigs in Sweden. Virus Genes. 2018;54(3):466–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzo G, Legnardi M, Hjulsager CK, et al. Full-genome sequencing of porcine circovirus 3 field strains from Denmark, Italy and Spain demonstrates a high within-Europe genetic heterogeneity. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(3):602–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Tian K. Porcine circovirus type 3: a threat to the pig industry? Vet Rec. 2017;181(24):659.3–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadejek T, Woźniak A, Miłek D, et al. First detection of porcine circovirus type 3 on commercial pig farms in Poland. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(5)：1350–13543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccini S, Barbieri I, Gilioli A, et al. Detection and genetic characterization of Porcine circovirus type 3 in Italy. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(6):1661–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon T, Yoo SJ, Park CK, et al. Prevalence of novel porcine circovirus 3 in Korean pig populations. Vet Microbiol. 2017;207:178–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tochetto C, Lima DA, Varela APM, et al. Full‐genome sequence of porcine circovirus type 3 recovered from serum of sows with stillbirths in Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;65(1)5–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu X, Fang B, Ma J, et al. Insights into the epidemic characteristics and evolutionary history of the novel porcine circovirus type 3 in southern China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(2):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraiva GL, Vidigal P, Fietto J, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) indicates an ancient origin for its current strains and a worldwide dispersion. Virus Genes. 2018;54（3）：376–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzo G, Legnardi M, Tucciarone CM, et al. Porcine circovirus type 3: a threat to the pig industry? Vet Rec. 2018;182(3):83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao CT, Halbur PG, Opriessnig T. Global molecular genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) sequences confirms the presence of four main PCV2 genotypes and reveals a rapid increase of PCV2d. J Gen Virol. 2015;96(Pt 7):1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepin KM, Domsic J, Mckenna R. Genomic evolution in a virus under specific selection for host recognition. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8(6):825–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Sun S, Norenburg JL, et al. editors. Mutation and selection cause codon usage and bias in mitochondrial genomes of ribbon worms (Nemertea). International Conference on Measuring Technology & Mechatronics Automation. 2014；9（1）：388–391..
   Google Scholar
• Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, et al. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8(1):r49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Wang R, Zhang C, et al. Genetic and evolutionary analysis of emerging H3N2 canine influenza virus. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2018 04 25;7(1):73. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agashe D, Martinezgomez NC, Drummond DA, et al. Good codons, bad transcript: large reductions in gene expression and fitness arising from synonymous mutations in a key enzyme. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(3):549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu W, Zhou T, Ma J, et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in SARS coronavirus and other viruses in the nidovirales. Virus Res. 2004;101(2):155–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YS, Zhou JH, Chen HT, et al. The characteristics of the synonymous codon usage in enterovirus 71 virus and the effects of host on the virus in codon usage pattern. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(5):1168–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moratorio G, Iriarte A, Moreno P, et al. A detailed comparative analysis on the overall codon usage patterns in West Nile virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;14(1):396–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Cowe E, Higgins DG, et al. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(17):8207–8211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan T, Li D, Luo MC, et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in classical swine fever virus. Virus Genes. 2009;38(1):104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelton LA, Parrish CR, Holmes EC. Evolutionary basis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in vertebrate DNA viruses. J Mol Evol. 2006;62(5):551–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sun J, Tong X, et al. First analysis of synonymous codon usage in porcine circovirus. Arch Virol. 2014;159(8):2145–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel M. The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing edited by. Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M. Biometrics. 2010; 66(1): 324–325
   Google Scholar
• Marais G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L. Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(10):5688–5692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, He W, Bi Y, et al. Origin, genetic diversity, and evolutionary dynamics of novel porcine circovirus 3. Adv Sci. 2018:201800275.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22(7):346–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Z, Zou Y, et al. First molecular detection of porcine circovirus type 3 in dogs in China. Virus Genes. 2017;54(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku X, Chen F, Li P, et al. Identification and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(3):703–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Li Y, Ren X, et al. Deciphering the bat virome catalog to better understand the ecological diversity of bat viruses and the bat origin of emerging infectious diseases. Isme Journal. 2015;10(3):609–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan S, Ku X, Chen F, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel porcine circovirus type 3 strain, PCV3/CN/Hubei-618/2016, Isolated from China. Genome Announc. 2017;5(15).
   Google Scholar
• Wen S, Sun W, Li Z, et al. The detection of porcine circovirus 3 in Guangxi, China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;65(1):27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng S, Wu X, Zhang L, et al. The occurrence of porcine circovirus 3 without clinical infection signs in Shandong Province. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(5):1337–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GH, Mai KJ, Zhou L, et al. Detection and genome sequencing of porcine circovirus 3 in neonatal pigs with congenital tremors in South China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(6): 1650–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalia G, Andrés I, Victoria C, et al. Pandemic influenza A virus codon usage revisited: biases, adaptation and implications for vaccine strain development. Virol J. 2012;9(1):263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera BC, Virmani N, Kumar N, et al. Genetic and codon usage bias analyses of polymerase genes of equine influenza virus and its relation to evolution. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma MR, Ha XQ, Ling H, et al. The characteristics of the synonymous codon usage in hepatitis B virus and the effects of host on the virus in codon usage pattern. Virol J. 2011;8(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CT, Lin CH, Chang CY. Analysis of codon usage bias and base compositional constraints in iridovirus genomes. Virus Res. 2007;126(1–2):196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XS, Zhang YG, Fang YZ, et al. Patterns and influencing factor of synonymous codon usage in porcine circovirus. Virol J. 2012;9(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn A, Kippenberger S. Clinical application of CpG-, non-CpG-, and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides as immunomodulators. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008;10(1):10–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butt AM, Nasrullah I, Qamar R, et al. Evolution of codon usage in Zika virus genomes is host and vector specific. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2016;5(10):e107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez G, Bosch A, Pintó RM, et al. Capsid structural constraints of hepatitis a virus. J Virol. 2003;77(1):452–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JS, Wang QQ, Zhang J, et al. The characteristic of codon usage pattern and its evolution of hepatitis C virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(8):2098–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denner J, Mankertz A. Porcine Circoviruses and Xenotransplantation. Viruses. 2017;9:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland SM, Forrest L, Carre H, et al. Investigation of porcine circovirus contamination in human vaccines. Biologicals. 2012;40(4):270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattermann K, Roedner C, Schmitt C, et al. Infection studies on human cell lines with porcine circovirus type 1 and porcine circovirus type 2. Xenotransplantation. 2010;11(3):284–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, et al. RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes EC, Worobey M, Rambaut A. Phylogenetic evidence for recombination in dengue virus. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16(3):405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin D, Rybicki E. RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(6):562–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology. 1999;265(2):218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(24):13757–13762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JM. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;34(2):126–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DP, Posada D, Crandall KA, et al. A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21(1):98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ. Sister-scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(7):573–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics. 2007;176(2):1035–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–1870–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41(41):95–98.
   Google Scholar
• The WF. ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87(1):23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeron JM, An AM. Evaluation of measures of synonymous codon usage bias. J Mol Evol. 1998;47(3):268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre MJ. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;80(392).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Bera BC, Greenbaum BD, et al. Revelation of influencing factors in overall codon usage bias of equine influenza viruses. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14(19):7737–7749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1–2):28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong EH, Smith DK, Rabadan R, et al. Codon usage bias and the evolution of influenza A viruses. Codon usage biases of influenza virus. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10(1):253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueoka N. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol. 1995;40(3):318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueoka N. Translation-coupled violation of Parity Rule 2 in human genes is not the cause of heterogeneity of the DNA G+C content of third codon position. Gene. 1999;238(1):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueoka N. Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(8):2653–2657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puigbò P, Bravo IG, Garciavallve S. CAIcal: a combined set of tools to assess codon usage adaptation. Biol Direct. 2008;3(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15(3):1281–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puigbò P, Aragonès L, Garciavallvé S. RCDI/eRCDI: a web-server to estimate codon usage deoptimization. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3(1):1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller S, Papamichail D, Coleman JR, et al. Reduction of the rate of poliovirus protein synthesis through large-scale codon deoptimization causes attenuation of viral virulence by lowering specific infectivity. J Virol. 2006;80(19):9687–9696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou JH, Zhang J, Sun DJ, et al. The distribution of synonymous codon choice in the translation initiation region of dengue virus. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X. DAMBE6: new tools for microbial genomics, phylogenetics, and molecular evolution. J Hered. 2017;108(4):431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlin S, Burge C. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet. 1995;11(7):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982;157(1):105–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar