Using Voice-Recorded Reflections to Increase Cognitive Presence in Hybrid Courses

References

• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliance for Excellent Education. (2011). A time for deeper learning preparing students for a changing world. Education Digest, 77(4), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Azer, S. A., Guerrero, A. S., & Walsh, A. (2013). Enhancing learning approaches: Practical tips for students and teachers. Medical Teacher, 35(6), 433–443. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.775413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H. (2009). Facilitating students' critical thinking in online discussions: An instructor's experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 156–164.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Czerkawski, B. (2014). Designing deeper learning experiences for online instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(2), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–10.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet & Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Designing for reflection in online courses. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Research and development I. Higher education (pp. 313–319). Perth, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International, 49(3), 217–229. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.738014
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology of Education (2014). ISTE standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/ISTE-standards/standards-for-teachers
   Google Scholar
• Jick. T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 248–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. M., & Brandes, G. (2010). Social justice needs to be everywhere: Imagining the future of anti-oppression education in teacher preparation. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 388–402. Retrieved from http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/ajer/index.php/ajer/article/view/839
   Google Scholar
• Laird, T. N., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, C. F. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year students' thinking: Deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 402–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, J., & Fisher, J. (2013). Community of inquiry framework: Establishing community in an online course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Applied Social Science Series (Volume 42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The handbook of applied research methods (2nd ed., pp. 42–68). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, V. (2010). Increasing teacher candidate responses through the application of VoiceThread. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(11), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations In Education & Teaching International, 46(2), 147–160. doi:10.1080/14703290902843778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moczygemba, R. (2014). If you can flip a classroom, you can flip a district. International Society for Technology of Education. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/explore/articledetail?articleid=2
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2008). Partnerships for public purposes: Engaging higher education in societal challenges of the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/wegner/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, P. (2014). Reflection as an indicator of cognitive presence. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 46–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (2013). The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education. Teaching In Higher Education, 18(2), 144–155. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.694104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryshke, R. (2012). What schools can do to encourage innovation. Retrieved from http://rryshke.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/what-schools-can-do-to-encourage-innovation
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). Design as a reflective conversation with the situation. In The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (pp. 76–104). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data. Methodological Issues in Social Health and Diabetes Research, 3, 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., & Vanderhaar, J. (2008). Negotiating resistance to multiculturalism in a teacher education curriculum: A case study. Teacher Educator, 43(3), 173–197. doi:10.1080/08878730802055057
   Google Scholar
• Trail Ross, M. E. (2012). Linking classroom learning to the community through service learning. Journal Of Community Health Nursing, 29(1), 53–60. doi:10.1080/07370016.2012.645746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2012). Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1030–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei-Ying, H., Manfen, C., & Hsing-Wen, H. (2013). Assessing online discussions: Adoption of critical thinking as a grading criterion. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 9(3), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar