Science stories: researchers’ experiences of writing science communication and the implications for training future scientists

References

• Åmossa, K. (2021). Vart tar pengarna vägen? – Om statsmakternas prioriteringar och lärosätenas interna fördelning av basanslag för forskning och utbildning på forskarnivå (del 1). Sveriges universitetslärare och forskare (SULF). https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/sulf.se/app/uploads/2021/05/Vart-tar-forskningspengarna-vagen_slutlig_webb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Science communication training: What are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhuizen, G.. (2015). Narrative knowledging in second language teaching and learning contexts. In In DeFina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 97–115).
   Google Scholar
• Bohlin, G., & Bergman, M. (2019). Jag vill, men hinner inte! – forskares syn på kommunikation och öppen vetenskap. Nationell enkätundersökning 2019. (VA-rapport 2019:8). https://v-a.se/2019/09/jag-vill-men-hinner-inte-forskares-syn-pakommunikation-och-oppen-vetenskap/
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824459
   Google Scholar
• Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. (2019). Facing the challenges of science communication 2.0: Quality, credibility and expertise. EFSA Journal, 17(S1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170702
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cosentino, M., & Souviron-Priego, L. (2021). Think of the early career researchers! Saving the oceans through collaborations. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8(574620). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.574620.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. (2020). An empirical and conceptual note on science communication’s role in society. Science Communication, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980500117827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defazio, D., Kolympiris, C., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2022). Busy academics share less: The impact of professional and family roles on academic withholding behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1793931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, L. (2017). The forgotten tribe: Scientists as writers. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0759
   Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., Bauer, M. W., O’Muircheartaigh, C., Marcinkowski, F., Okamura, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2020). Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0235191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In M. W. Bauer, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731
   Google Scholar
• Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 637–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gavhi-Molefe, M. R., Jensen, E., & Joubert, M. (2021). Why scientists agree to participate in science festivals: Evidence from South Africa. . International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.1905904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2018). Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog? Public Understanding of Science, 25(8), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516646048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland, P., Kasperowski, D., & Nielsen, K. H. (2020). Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Share, make useful and critically discuss: Science communication. In Toss Gascoigne, , Bernard Schiele, Joan Leach, Michelle Riedlinger, Bruce V. Lewenstein, Luisa Massarani, & Peter Broks (Eds.), Communicating Science: A Global Perspective (pp. 253–278). ANU Press, The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists and journalists credibility. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel, K., & Holmen, S. J. (2019). Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00055
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. Y. (2021, August 15-20). Knowledge brokering in the social sciences. Mediating research for the general reader [Conference presentation]. 19th AILA World Congress 2021, Groningen Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Being an academic: How junior female academics in Korea survive in the neoliberal context of a patriarchal society. Higher Education, 81(6), 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00613-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente, C., Revuelta, G., Carrió, M., & Porta, M. (2019). Scientists’ opinions and attitudes towards citizens’ understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0224262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzón, M. J., & Pérez-Llantada, C. (2019). Science communication on the internet: Old genres meet new genres. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, S., & Merga, M. (2021). Communicating research in academia and beyond: Sources of self-efficacy for early career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1945545
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Nicholls, K. (2019). Hidden expectations: Scaffolding subject specialists’ genre knowledge of the assignments they set. Higher Education, 78(5), 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00373-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K., & Mason, S. (2020). Perspectives on institutional valuing and support for academic and translational outputs in Japan and Australia. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. (2013). Managing academics in Canada and the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020017
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., Świgoń, M., & Herman, E. (2017). Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2008). Textographies and the researching and teaching of writing. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos, 15, 9–24. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2573812
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021a). Genres and languages in science communication: The multiple dimensions of the science-policy interface. Language & Communication, 78, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Llantada, C. (2021b). Research genres across languages: Multilingual communication online. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, S. (2018). Communicating climate change and other evidence-based controversies. In S. H. Priest, J. Goodwin, & M. F. Dahlstrom (Eds.), Ethics and practice in science communication (pp. 54–73). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, K., Selkrig, M., Manathunga, C., & Keamy, R. K. (2020). Community engagement is … : Revisiting Boyer’s model of scholarship. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 1232–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1712680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumbanis, L. (2019). Symbolic violence in academic life: A study on how junior scholars are educated in the art of getting funded. Minerva, 57(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9364-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell Bernard, H. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., Leavy, P., & Beretvas, N. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7(1605), 1605. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SFS 1977:218. Högskolelag. Sveriges riksdag. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/hogskolelag-1977218_sfs-1977-218
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2021:317. Lag om ändring i högskolelagen (1992:1434). https://www.lagboken.se/Lagboken/start/skoljuridik/hogskolelag-19921434/d_4293716-sfs-2021_317-lag-om-andring-i-hogskolelagen-1992_1434
   Google Scholar
• Silander, C., Haake, U., Lindberg, L., & Riis, U. (2021). Nordic research on gender equality in academic careers: A literature review. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1895858.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press ELT.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitikka, E. (2021, August 15–20). Constructing authorial voice and expertise in science-based non-fiction written by Finnish scholars [Conference presentation]. 19th AILA World Congress 2021, Groningen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonai, E., & Blonder, R. (2020). USE YOUR OWN WORDS! Developing science communication skills of NST experts in a guided discourse. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 86(5), 672–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar