Why science education and for whom? The contributions of science capital and Bildung

References

• Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015a). Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Dewitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2015b). Is science for Us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careers. Science Education, 99(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Dawson, E., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2016). Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families' experiences of a science museum visit. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 917–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012a). Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012b). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Dewitt, J., & Willis, B. (2014). Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Godec, S., Calabrese Barton, A., Dawson, E., Mau, A., & Patel, U. (2021). Changing the field: A Bourdieusian analysis of educational practices that support equitable outcomes among minoritized youth on two informal science learning programs. Science Education, 105(1), 166–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Willis, B. (2013). Aspires 1: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14, 40. King’s College London Department of Education & Professional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2016). Re-thinking science capital: the role of ‘capital’ and ‘identity’ in mediating students’ engagement with mathematically demanding programmes at university. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4), 311–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2015). Scientific literacy. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 944–947). Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Christidou, D., Papavlasopoulou, S., & Giannakos, M. (2021). Using the lens of science capital to capture and explore children’s attitudes toward science in an informal making-based space. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(5/6), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2020-0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Government. (2018). National naturvidenskabsstrategi. Undervisningsministeriet. https://www.uvm.dk/publikationer/folkeskolen/2018-national-naturvidenskabsstrategi
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. (2014). “Not designed for Us”: How science museums and science centers socially exclude Low-income, minority ethnic groups. Science Education, 98(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: Exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., Nomikou, E., & Godec, S. (2019). Recognising and valuing student engagement in science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1514276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, H. (2015). Bildung. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 118–122). Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Godec, S. (2017). Urban girls’ engagement with science within lessons, class visits and family visits to science museums: Interactions of gender, social class and ethnicity (doctoral dissertation). King's College London.
   Google Scholar
• Godec, S., Archer, L., & Dawson, E. (2022). Interested but not being served: mapping young people’s participation in informal STEM education through an equity lens. Research Papers in Education, 37(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1849365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godec, S., King, H., & Archer, L. (2017). The Science Capital Teaching Approach: engaging students with science, promoting social justice. UCL Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Godec, S., King, H., Archer, L., Dawson, E., & Seakins, A. (2018). Examining student engagement with science through a Bourdieusian notion of field. Science & Education, 27(5), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9988-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A. J., Cavalcante, A. S., Sprowls, E. D., & Iacono, H. (2021). “Anybody can do science if they're brave enough”: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(8), 1117–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). To Choose or Not to Choose Science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of bildung. A comparative cultural history. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000). The significance of classical theories of bildung for a contemporary concept of allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition (pp. 85–107). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maaser, M., & Walther, G. (2011). Einleitung. In M. Maaser, & G. Walther (Eds.), Bildung. Ziele und formen. Traditionen und systeme. Medien und akteure (pp. XI–XV). Verlag J. B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Mendick, H., Berge, M., & Danielsson, A. (2017). A critique of the STEM pipeline: Young people’s identities in Sweden and science education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1300232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and maths aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1228–1249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2021). Who has high science capital? An exploration of emerging patterns of science capital among students aged 17/18 in England. Research Papers in Education, 36(4), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1678062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Museo scienza. (2021). Tinkering EU. http://www.museoscienza.it/tinkering-eu2/partners.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen, L. (2020). Astrophysics: Designing for inclusion (doctoral dissertation, university of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). Retrieved https://www.ind.ku.dk/begivenheder/2020/line-bruun-nicolaisen/.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen, L. B., & Achiam, M. (2020). The implied visitor in a planetarium exhibition. Museum Management and Curatorship, 35(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2019.1691637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen, L. B., Achiam, M., & Ibsen, T. (2021). Transforming astrophysics in a planetarium: ‘we are part of the universe, the universe is part of us’. Experimental Museology: Institutions, Representations, Users, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringen. (2018). National naturvidenskabsstrategi. Undervisningsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Shaby, N., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Tal, T. (2019). ‘I know how it works!’ student engagement with exhibits in a science museum. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1624991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 65–88). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). The bildung theory—from von humboldt to klafki and beyond. In B. Akpan, & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 55–67). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S. (2005). Naturfag som almendannelse. En kritisk fagdidaktik. Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Skov, M., Lykke, M., & Jantzen, C. (2018). Introducing walk-alongs in visitor studies: A mobile method approach to studying user experience. Visitor Studies, 21(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1549396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. (2013 [1959]). The Two cultures and the scientific. Marino Fine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., Scholes, L., McDonald, S., & Lunn, J. (2021). Middle years students’ engagement with science in rural and urban communities in Australia: exploring science capital, place-based knowledges and familial relationships. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1684351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vester, M. (1976). Was dem Bürger sein Goethe, ist dem Arbeiter seine Solidarität. Ästhetik und Kommunikation, 24, 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenschein, M. (2000 [1965]). Teaching to understand: On the concept of the exemplary in teaching. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition (pp. 161–175). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Lopez, A., Sias, C., Smithee, A., Mar, I., & Un, H. (2018). Forms of science capital mobilized in adolescents’ engineering projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmann, A. (2018). The absence of ‘race’ in German discourses on Bildung. Rethinking Bildung with critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YESTEM Project Team. (2021). YESTEM Insight: The Equity Compass: A Tool for supporting socially just practice – Teacher Edition. yestem.org.
   Google Scholar