Disciplinary cultures and participation in international research networks: how science communication practices and motivation relate to contextual factors

References

• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0284-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. (2020). International mobility and social capital in the academic field. Minerva, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09401-w
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Jensen, P. (2011). The mobilization of scientists for public engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510394457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/258724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C. (2018). The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516649803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., & Lawrence, F. (2018). Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Science Communication, 40(5), 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018786561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., O’Hara, K., & Dudo, A. (2019). Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics. PloS one, 14(10), e0224039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Dietz, J., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7), 716–740. ∼. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, K. (2015). Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: Literature review. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp060036.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Civera, A., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2020). Engagement of academics in university technology transfer: Opportunity and necessity academic entrepreneurship. European Economic Review, 123, 103376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Delicado, A. (2014). At the (semi) periphery. The development of science and technology studies in Portugal. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 4(2), 125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., & Besley, J. C. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PloS one, 11(2), e0148867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., & Dudo, A. (2009). Socialization or rewards? Predicting U.S. scientist-media interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., & Bauer, M. M. (2017). Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes. Public Understanding of Science, 26(7), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516633834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., Bauer, M. W., O’Muircheartaigh, C., Marcinkowski, F., Okamura, A., Pellegrini, G., Besley, J., Massarani, L., Russo, P., Dudo, A., Saracino, B., Silva, C., Kano, K., Amorim, L., Bucchi, M., Suerdem, A., Oyama, T., & Li, Y.-Y. (2020). Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? PloS one, 15(7), e0235191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., Marcelino, J., Bauer, M. W., & Lewenstein, B. (2019). Public communication by climate scientists: What, with whom and why? Climatic Change, 154(1–2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02414-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. (2018). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016). Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: An analysis of international coauthorship. Scientometrics, 109(1), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1927-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, W. D., Lin, N., & Nelson, C. E. (1970). Communication in the physical and the social sciences: The processes of disseminating and assimilating information differ in these two groups of sciences. Science, 170(3963), 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3963.1166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascoigne, T., & Metcalfe, J. (1997). Incentives and impediments to scientists communicating through the media. Science Communication, 18(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547097018003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero Bote, V. P., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 64(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 105, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., & Bonn, A. (2018). Innovation in open science, society and policy–setting the agenda for citizen science. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Looi, J., Leung, Y. W., & Goh, T. J. (2020). Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro-and meso-level concerns. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519888761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. (2011). A statistical picture of popularization activities and their evolutions in France. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., & Croissant, Y. (2007). CNRS researchers’ popularization activities: A progress report. Journal of Science Communication, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.06030201
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., Ecklund, E. H., & Lincoln, A. E. (2014). Narratives of science outreach in elite contexts of academic science. Science Communication, 36(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013499142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreimer, P., Levin, L., & Jensen, P. (2011). Popularization by Argentine researchers: The activities and motivations of CONICET scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2015). The internationalization of research in Europe: A quantitative study of 11 national systems from a micro-level perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315572898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, N., Bloch, C., & Madsen, E. B. (2019). Responsible research and innovation in Europe: A cross-country comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy, 46(2), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M. (2019). Explaining science funding attitudes in the United States: The case for science interest. Public Understanding of Science, 28(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518795397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netz, N., Hampel, S., & Aman, V. (2020). What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 29(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, J. A. (2002). As dinâmicas da(s) ciência(s) no perímetro do centro: Uma cultura científica de fronteira? Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 63(63), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1279
   Google Scholar
• Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T. L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, A., & Illingworth, S. (2016). Aiming for long-term, objective-driven science communication in the UK. F1000Research, 5, 1540. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9079.2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson, L. D., Cawthray, J. L., West, S. E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. In Susanne Hecker, Muki Haklay, Anne Bowser, Zen Makuch, Johannes Vogel, & Aletta Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 27–40). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. (2006). Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers excellence in science. London. Retrieved 02 Nov 2020. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1818-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suldovsky, B. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences. Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, P. (2016). Take the time and effort to correct misinformation. Nature, 540(7632), 171–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/540171a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. K., & Brossard, D. (2017). The (changing) nature of scientist–media interactions: A cross-national analysis. The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.29
   Google Scholar